Scalability of Learners’ Success Rates in e-Learning: A Survey Study of the Learners’ Perspectives

Ezra K. Maritim 1  and Daniel Makini Getuno 1
  • 1 Egerton University, , 536-20115, Egerton, Kenya

Abstract

Globally, ODL institutions experience mismatch between scalability of numbers and scalability of success rates. This study explored the scalability of success rates in open, distance e-learning as perceived by the learners within the Chain of Response Model. The primary aim of the study was to look at online learners’ success rate by focusing on two institutional factors drawn from the Model, namely: the learner’s study modules related challenges and support services. The results of an online survey of 180 undergraduate and postgraduate online learners of Egerton University, Kenya, showed: (a) the response rate of 16%; (b) a mixture of hardware, software and personal factors were identified as pre-requisites for e-learning success: (c) a number of mathematically-based modules were identified as risks to success in online studies; and (d) while the learners saw the learner support services as important they were less satisfied with their provision. The present study points to two broad areas that require further studies. First, qualitative look into specific challenges that learners face with respect to learner support service provisions, modules interactivity, and those identified as difficult to follow and thus posing risks to the learners’ success. Second, investigation into tutor-learner contacts with the view of identifying whether such contacts are reactive or proactive.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Abdon, B. R., Ninomiya, S., & Raab, R. T. (2007). E-learning in higher education makes its debut in Cambodia: The Provisional Business Education Project. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1), 1-11.

  • 2. Alexander, S. (2001). E-learning developments and experiences. Education & Training, 43(4/5), 240-248.

  • 3. Asbee, S., & Simpson, O. (1998). Partners, families and friends: Student support of the closest kind. Open Learning, 13(5), 56-59.

  • 4. Ashby, A. (2004). Monitoring student retention in the Open University: Definition, measurement, interpretation and action. Open Learning, 19(1), 65-77.

  • 5. Barefoot, B. O. (2004). Higher education’s revolving door: confronting the problem of student drop out in US colleges and universities. Open Learning, 19(1), 9-18.

  • 6. Berge, Z. L., & Huang, Y. (2004). A model for sustainable student retention: A holistic perspective on the student dropout problem with special attention to e-learning. DEOSNEWS, 13(5).

  • 7. Betts, K. (2017, January 10). The growth of online learning: How Universities must adjust to the new norm. EducationDIVE [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.educationdive.com/news/the-growth-of-online-learning-how-universities-must-adjust-to-the-new-norm/433632/

  • 8. Bhalalusesa, E. P. (2006). The dynamics of teaching at a distance in Tanzania: Reflections from the field. Open Learning, 2(1), 49-58.

  • 9. Bird, J., & Morgan. C. (2003). Adults contemplating university study at a distance: Issues, themes and concerns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1).

  • 10. Carr, S. (2000, July 07). Many professors are optimistic on distance learning survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Many-Professors-Are-Optimistic/15541

  • 11. Carr, S. (2000, February 11). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/As-Distance-Education-Comes-of/14334.

  • 12. Carroll, D., Ng, E., & Birch, D. (2009). Retention and progression of postgraduate business students: An Australian perspective. The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(3), 197-209.

  • 13. Chua, A., & Lam, W. (2007). Quality assurance in online education: The Universitas 21 Global approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 1), 133-152.

  • 14. Cross, K. P. (1981). Adults as learners: Increasing participation and facilitating learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • 15. Daniel, J. S. (1997). Why universities need technology strategies. Change; The Magazine of Higher Learning, 29(4), 10-17.

  • 16. Davies, G., & Stacey, E. (1998). Virtual universities: are dual mode universities the solution? Paper presented at the FIE ‘98. 28th Annual Conference – Frontiers in Education Conference, 4-7 November, 1998, Tempe, AZ, USA. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/738776/

  • 17. Desjardins, R., Garrouste-Norelius, C., & Mendes, S. (2004). Benchmarking education and training systems in Europe: An international comparative study. Stockholm, Institute of International Education, Stockholm University.

  • 18. Diaz, D. P. (2002). Online drop rates revisited. The Technology Source Archive, 2002(May/June). Retrieved from http://www.technologysource.org/article/online_drop_rates_revisited/

  • 19. Dupin-Bryant. P. A. (2004). Pre-entry variables related to retention in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 199-206.

  • 20. Evans, J. R., & Haase, I. M. (2001). Online business education in the twenty-first-century: An analysis of potential target markets. Internet Research: New working Applications and Policy, 11(93), 246-260.

  • 21. Flood, J. (2002). Read all about it: Online learning facing 80% attrition rates. TOJDE – Turkish Online Journal of Education, 3(2).

  • 22. Garland, M. R. (1993). Student perceptions of the situational, institutional, dispositional and epistemological barriers to persistence. Distance Education, 14(2), 181-198.

  • 23. Glennie, J. (2008). A Critical Overview of Quality Assurance and Accreditation Policies, Structures and Practices for ODL in Africa: Gaps, Challenges, and Lessons for the ACDE continental initiative. Paper presented at the African Council for Distance Education Stakeholders Workshop held at the University of South Africa, Pretoria, February 21-23.

  • 24. Gonzalez-Gomez, F., Guardioli, J., Rodriguez, O. M., & Alonso, M. A. M. (2011). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computer & Education, 58, 283-290.

  • 25. Gunga, S. O., & Ricketts, I. W. (2007). Facing the challenges of e-learning initiatives in African universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 896-906.

  • 26. Hardman, L., & Dunlap, J. C. (2003). Learner support services for online students: Scaffolding for success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(1).

  • 27. Harris, M. L., & Gibson, S. G. (2006). Distance education vs face-to-face classes: Individual differences, course preferences and enrollment. Psychological Reports, 98, 756-764.

  • 28. Heydenrych, J. F., & Prinsloo, P. (2010). Revisiting the five generations of distance education: Quo vadis? Progressio: South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice, 32(1), 5-26.

  • 29. Henderikx, P. (1999). On the way to Virtual Universities: Open and distance higher education in Europe. In G. E. Ortner & F. Nickolmann (Eds.), Socio-Economics of Virtual Universities (pp. 29-51). Weinheim: Druck Partner Rubelmann.

  • 30. Kamau, J. W. (1999). Challenges of course development and implementation in dual mode institutions. Paper presented as a case study at the Pan Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning, 1-5 March 1999, University of Brunei, Darussalam Brunei. Retrieved from http://colfinder.net/materials/Supporting_Distance_Education_Through_Policy_Development/resources/worldbank/Management/Operations/m25abot.htm

  • 31. Kamau, J. W. (2010), Factors that affect the progress and retention of distance learners in the Diploma in Primary Education Programme in Botswana. Progressio: South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice, 32(2), 164-180.

  • 32. Kaye, T., & Rumble, G. (1991). Open universities: A comparative approach. Prospects, 21(2), 214-226.

  • 33. Khan, B. H. (2000). A framework for e-learning. Distance Education Report, 4(24), 3-8.

  • 34. Kenya Education Network (2013). The e-readiness survey of Kenyan universities. Nairobi: Author.

  • 35. Kolowich, S. (2014, January 15). Doubts about MOOCs continues to rise, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Doubts-About-MOOCs-Continue-to/144007/.

  • 36. Larner, M. (2009). Where’s Walter? Adjunct outreach strategies to bridge the virtual distance and increase student retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(2).

  • 37. Latif, A. L., Sungsri, S., & Bahroom, R. (2006). Managing retention in ODL institutions: A case of Open University Malaysia and Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. ASEAN. Journal of Open Distance Learning, 1(1).

  • 38. Lauerman, J. (2014, January 21). Harvard, MIT Online courses dropped by 95% of registrars. Bloomberg Technology [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-01-21/harvard-online-courses-dropped-by-95-of-registered-study-says

  • 39. Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48(2), 185-204.

  • 40. Maritim, E. K. (2009). The distance learning mode of training teachers in Kenya: Challenges, prospects, and suggested policy framework. The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(3), 241-254.

  • 41. Maritim, E. K., &. Mushi, H. M. K. (2011). Mobile technologies for enhancing distance learning in Tanzania: An exploratory study. West African Journal of Open and Flexible Learning, 1(1), 91-110.

  • 42. McGivney, V. (2004). Understanding persistence in adult learning. Open Learning, 19(1), 33-46.

  • 43. Mitra, S. (2009). Student support services in open schooling: A case study of students’ needs and satisfaction in India. Open Learning, 24(3), 255-265.

  • 44. Morgan, C., & Tam, M. (1999). Unraveling the complexities of distance education student attrition. Distance Education, 20(1), 96-108.

  • 45. Nichols, M. (2010). Student perceptions of support service and the influence of targeted interventions on retention in distance learning. Distance Education, 31(1), 93-113.

  • 46. Nonyongo, E. P., & Ngengebule, A. T. (1998). Learner support services: Case studies of DEASA member institutions. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

  • 47. Nully, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 301-314.

  • 48. Olakulehin, F. K. (2008). Open and distance education as a strategy for human capital development in Nigeria. Open Learning, 23(2), 123-130.

  • 49. Oosthuizen, A. G., Loedolff, P. v. Z., & Hamman, F. (2010). Students’ perceptions of the quality of learner support in ODL. Progressio: South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice, 32(1), 185-205.

  • 50. OnlineUniversities.com (2018). Investigating the online study body. Retrieved from http://www.onlineuniversities.com/articles/educators/investigating-the-online-student-body/

  • 51. Olibie, E. I., Offor, U. I., & Onyebuchi, C. G. (2016). A tale of two cities: Hindrances to distance learning programmes in Ikwa and Nnewi cities in Anambra State of Nigeria. Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 1(1).

  • 52. Ortner, G. E. (1999). Socio-economics of virtual universities: Introduction and summary. In G. E. Ortner & F. Nickolmann (Eds.), Socio-Economics of Virtual Universities (pp. 9-28). Weinheim: Druck Partner Rubelmann.

  • 53. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for virtual classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Boss.

  • 54. Parker, A. (1995). Distance education attrition. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 389-406.

  • 55. Perraton, H. (2007). Open and distance learning in the developing world. London: Routledge.

  • 56. Pierrakeas, C., Xenos, M., Panagiotakopoulos, C., & Vergidis, D. (2004). A comparative study of dropout rates and causes for two different distance education courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2).

  • 57. Rekkedal, T., & Eriksen, S. Q. (2004). Support services in e-learning-An evaluation study of students’ needs and satisfaction. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 2004(I). Retrieve from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2004/Rekkedal_Qvist-Eriksen.pdf

  • 58. Risenga, A. (2010). Attributes of students’ success and failure in typical ODL institutions. Progressio: South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice, 32(2), 85-101.

  • 59. Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programmes. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 1-16.

  • 60. Rowley, R. W. (1996). Student support services. Higher education management: The key elements. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University.

  • 61. SAIDE (2004). All African Ministers’ conference on online and distance education held in Cape Town International Convention Centre, February 2-4, 2004.

  • 62. Schnack, J. (2005, June). University E-learning. J@pan Inc [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.japaninc.com/article.php?articleID=1448

  • 63. Sharma, R., & Samdup, P. E. (2009). Revisiting gender in open and distance learning-an independent variable or mediated reality? Open Learning, 24(2).

  • 64. Siaciwena, R. M. (1983). Problems of managing an external degree programme at the University of Zambia. Journal of Adult Education, 2(1), 69-77. University of Zambia.

  • 65. Siemens, G. (2002, August 22). Lessons learned teaching online. elearnspace [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/lessonslearnedteaching.htm

  • 66. Simpson, O. (2002). Supporting students in online, open and distance learning (2nd ed.). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Kogan Page.

  • 67. Simpson, O. (2003). Student retention in online open and distance learning. Open and flexible learning series. UK: Routledge.

  • 68. Simpson, O. (2004). The impact on retention of interventions to support distance learning students. Open Learning, 19(1), 79-95.

  • 69. Simpson, O. (2006). Predicting student success in open and distance learning. Open Learning, 21(2), 125-138.

  • 70. Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: Are we failing our students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(2), 105-119.

  • 71. Smith, F. (2016, February 25). Report: One in four students enrolled in online courses. EdTech [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2016/02/report-one-four-students-enrolled-online-courses

  • 72. Thorpe, M. (2001). Learner support: A new model for online teaching and learning. Paper to the 20th ICDE World Conference, Dusseldorf.

  • 73. Tresman, S. (2002). Towards a strategy for improving student retention in programs of open, distance education: A case study from the Open University UK. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 2-11.

  • 74. Tyler-Smith, K. (2006). Early attrition among first time e-learners: A review of factors that contribute to drop-out, withdrawal and non-completion rates of adult learners undertaking e-learning programmes. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(2). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol2_No2_TylerSmith.htm

  • 75. Vaughan, K., & McVicar, A. (2004). Employee’ pre-implementation attitudes and perceptions to e-learning: A banking case study analysis. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28(5), 400-413.

  • 76. Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Factors that influence student decision to drop out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 8(4), 105-118.

  • 77. World Bank (2000a). Higher education in developing countries: Peril and promise. Washington, D.C: World Bank.

  • 78. World Bank (2000b). Can Africa claim the 21st century? Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  • 79. World Bank (2003). Lifelong learning in the global knowledge economy: Challenges for developing countries. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  • 80. Wright, C. R., Dhanarajan, G., & Reju, S A. (2009). Recurring issues encountered by distance educators in developing and emerging nations. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/608/1180

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search