Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this exploratory study examines the preservice teachers’ adoption of mobile technologies through the factors of current use, instructional use and future use in their teaching practices. Participants were 466 pre-service computer teachers enrolled at a public university in Turkey. A questionnaire developed by the researchers was used to collect data. Results indicated that the current use and instructional use factors had a strong positive correlation and also there was a similar correlation with the factor of future use and current use. Relationships between current, instructional, and future use of mobile technologies explained within the context of perceived usefulness, ease of use, and behavioural intention constructs of the TAM.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Acarli, D. S., & Sağlam, Y. (2015). Investigation of pre-service teachers’ intentions to use of social media in teaching activities within the framework of technology acceptance model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 709-713.
2. Aktaş, S. (2007). An application on technology acceptance model and accountants’ use of information technology. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gebze Institute of Technology, Turkey.
3. Attewell, J., Savill-Smith, C., Douch, R., & Parker, G. (2010). Modernising education and training: Mobilising technology for learning. London: Regent Arcade House.
4. Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human relations, 45(7), 659-686.
5. Baydas, O., & Göktaş, Y. (2016). Influential factors on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use ICT in future lessons. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 170-178.
6. Behera, S. (2013). M-learning: A new learning paradigm. International Journal on New Trends in Education & Their Implications, 4(2), 24-34.
7. Cacho, R. M. (2017). Student teachers’ smartphone academic uses and preferences: Perspectives for mobile-aided pedagogy. Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering, 57-61. doi:
7. Cacho, R. M. (2017). Student teachers’ smartphone academic uses and preferences: Perspectives for mobile-aided pedagogy. Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering, 57-61. doi:10.1109/ICTKE.2016.7804099)| false
8. Camilleri, V., & Montebello, M. (2011, May). Virtual World Presence for Pre-service Teachers: Does the TAM Model Apply? Proceedings of the Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), 2011 Third International Conference on, 156-159. IEEE.
9. Chen, F. H., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2009). Integrating technology in the classroom: a visual conceptualization of teachers’ knowledge, goals and beliefs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 470-488.
10. Chih-Yung, T., Chih-Chiang, W., & Ming-Te, L. (2011). Using the technology acceptance model to analyze ease of use of a mobile communication system. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 39(1), 65-69.
11. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
12. Darren Pullen, J. F., Swabey, K., Abadooz, M., & Sing, T. K. R. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ acceptance and use of mobile learning in Malaysia. Australian Educational Computing, 30(1).
13. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
14. Dexter, S., Doering, A. H., & Riedel, E. S. (2006). Content area specific technology integration: A model for educating teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 325.
15. Edmunds, R., Thorpe, M., & Conole, G. (2012). Student attitudes towards and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 71-84.
16. Escobar-Rodriguez, T., & Monge-Lozano, P. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1085-1093.
17. Frias-Martinez, V., Virseda, J, & Gomero, A. (2012, September). Mobilizing education: Evaluation of a mobile learning tool in a low-income school. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, San Francisco, USA.
18. Fulantelli, G., Taibi, D., & Arrigo, M. (2015). A framework to support educational decision making in mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 50-59.
19. Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004, June). M-learning-a new stage of е-learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, Rousse, Bulgaria.
20. Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204.
21. Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343-367.
22. Hu, P., Clark, T. H., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41(2), 227-241.
23. Jaradat, M. I. R. (2013). Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of mobile voting. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 7(1), 29-47.
24. Joo, Y. J., Lee, H. W., & Ham, Y. (2014). Integrating user interface and personal innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 143-158.
25. Kafyulilo, A. (2014). Access, use and perceptions of teachers and students towards mobile phones as a tool for teaching and learning in Tanzania. Education & Information Technologies, 19(1), 115-127.
26. Keller, C. (2005). Virtual learning environments: Three implementation perspectives. Learning, Media & Technology, 30(3), 299-311.
27. Kim, D., Chun, H., & Lee, H. (2014). Determining the factors that influence college students’ adoption of smartphones. Journal of the Association for information Science and Technology, 65(3), 578-588.
28. Kriek, J., & Stols, G. (2010) Teachers’ beliefs and their intention to use interactive simulations in their classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 30(3), 439-456.
29. Koca, M. (2006). Examining teachers? Use of information and communication technology according to variables of unified model of information and communication technology. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Turkey.
30. Kuo, K. M., Liu, C. F., & Ma, C. C. (2013). An investigation of the effect of nurses’ technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 13(1), 88.
31. Kuşkonmaz, H. (2011). Determining teacher’s perception of mobile learning at secondary schools. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bahçeşehir University, Turkey.
32. Lee, M. K., Cheung, C. M., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & management, 42(8), 1095-1104.
33. Ma, W. W., Andersson, R. R., & Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387-395.
34. Menzi, N., Önal, N., & Çalışkan, E. (2012). Investigating educational researchers’ views of using mobile technologies for educational purposes based on technology acceptance model. Ege Journal of Education, 13(1), 40-55.
35. Mun, Y. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: selfefficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(4), 431-449.
36. Murray, O. T., & Olcese, N. R. (2011). Teaching and learning with iPads, ready or not? TechTrends, 55(6), 42-48.
37. Nistor, N. (2014). When technology acceptance models won’t work: Non-significant intention-behavior effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 299-300.
38. Park, S., Nam, M., & Cha, S. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605.
39. Phuangthong, D., & Malisawan, D. (2005, August). A study of behavioral intention for 3G mobile internet technology: Preliminary research on mobile learning. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
40. Saadé, R., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W. (2007). Viability of the “Technology Acceptance Model” in multimedia learning environments: A comparative study. Journal of Knowledge & Learning Objects, 3(1), 175-184.
41. Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Migueláñez, S. O., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2014). ICTs integration in education: mobile learning and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 683-687. ACM.
42. Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Informal tools in formal contexts: Development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 55.
43. Teo, T. (2012). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: An integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 3-18.
44. Turan, B. (2011). The research of the usage of information and communication technologies via technology acceptance model and an application on elementary school teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Turkey.
45. Uzunboylu, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2011). Teacher perception for m-learning: Scale development and teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), 544-556.
46. Valtonen, T. (2011). An insight into collaborative learning with ICT: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. University of Eastern Finland.
47. Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Sormunen, K., Dillon, P., & Sointu, E. (2015). The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 81, 49-58.
48. Virvou, M., & Alepis, E. (2005). Mobile educational features in authoring tools for personalised tutoring. Computers & Education, 44, 53-68.
49. Wang, R., Wiesemes, R., & Gibbons, C. (2012). Developing digital fluency through ubiquitous mobile devices: Findings from a small-scale study. Computers & Education, 58(1), 570-578.
50. Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118.
51. Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & management, 42(5), 719-729.
52. Yamakawa, P., Delgado, C., Díaz, E., Garayar, E., & Laguna, H. (2013). Factors influencing the use of mobile technologies in a university environment: A case from Latin America. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 9(2), 24-38.
53. Yong-Wee, S., Siong-Hoe, L., Kung-Keat, T., Check-Yee, L., &Parumo, S. (2010). Prediction of user acceptance and adoption of smart phone for learning with technology acceptance model. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(20), 2395-2402.
54. Yuen, A. H., & Ma, W. W. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-243.