An Evaluation of the African Leadership in ICT Programme from a Quality Assurance Perspective

Mohammad Santally 1
  • 1 University of Mauritius, Mauritius

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive review of the African Leadership in ICT (ALICT-LATIC) course delivery model, offered by the Global e-Schools and Communities Initiatives (GESCI) from a quality assurance perspective taking into account the delivery model, cultural context, and the distributed nature of the programme and its participants, from a geographical perspective. In this paper, we look at the key concepts governing the ALICTLATIC course, such as the provision of transnational education and blended learning provisions. Through a series of steps including desk studies, expert observation and the application of the eLearning Maturity Model, we conduct an evaluation of the eLearning provision from a quality assurance perspective. We can reasonably argue at this stage that the current blended learning model is conducive for the development of skills and competencies as expected in terms of intended outcomes and learner experience. The quality of the course is comparable to academic standards adopted by institutions of higher education through their internal and external quality mechanisms.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Akpor, B., Muelhie, M., Tapper, H., & Nyambua, M. (2011). A Situational Analysis of Education, ICT, Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Development towards Knowledge Societies in South Africa.

  • 2. Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Al-Huwail, N., & Al-Sharhan, S. (2008). Blended e-Learning Design: Discussion of Cultural Issues. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 1(1), 17-32.

  • 3. Babb, S., Stewart, C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Constructing Communication in Blended Learning Environments: Students’ Perceptions of Good Practice in Hybrid Courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 735-753. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no4/babb_1210.pdf

  • 4. Barker, K. (2002). Canadian Recommended E-learning Guidelines (CanREGs). Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.futured.com/pdf/CanREGs%20Eng.pdf

  • 5. Berge, Z. L. (2007). Training in the corporate sector. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • 6. Bodley, J. (1994). An Anthropological Perspective. From Cultural Anthropology: Tribes, States and the GlobalSystem.

  • 7. Butcher, N. (2010). ICT, Education, Development, and the Knowledge Society. Retrieved from http://www.gesci.org

  • 8. Cisco Systems (2001). E-Learning Glossary. Internet Learning Solutions Group.

  • 9. Chilala, M., & Kumar, S. (2011). A Situational Analysis of Education, ICT, Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Development towards Knowledge Societies in Zambia.

  • 10. Clarke-Okah, W., & Daniel, J. (2012). Commonwealth of Learning: Review and Improvement Model. Commonwealth Education Partnerships 2010, 19-20. Retrieved December 1, 2015, from http://www.cedol.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/19-20-2010.pdf

  • 11. Collis, B., & Remmers, E. (1997). The world wide web in education: Issues related to crosscultural communication and interaction. In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based Instruction (pp. 85-92). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

  • 12. Denis, B. (2003). Quels rôles et quelle formation pour les tuteurs intervenant dans des dispositifs de formation à distance ? Distances et savoirs, 1(1), 19-46.

  • 13. Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M., & Gyles, G. (2003). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students’ learning outcomes? Accounting Education, 12(4), 373-391.

  • 14. GESCI (2013). African Leadership in ICT - Model Document 2013. Retrieved from http://gesci.org/resources/browse-resources/resource/resource/show/Resource/africanleadership-in-ict-model-document-2013/

  • 15. Gunawardena, C. N., & LaPointe, D. (2007). Cultural dynamics of online learning. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance learning (2nd ed., pp. 593-607). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • 16. Hooker, M. (2010). Concept Note: Building Leadership Capacity for ICT and Knowledge Societies in Africa.

  • 17. Hooker, M., & Bassi, R. (2011). Assessment of Environmental, Institutional and Individual Leadership Capacity Needs for the Knowledge Society in Africa: A Situational and Needs Analysis in Four Countries - Mauritius, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia: Summary Report.

  • 18. Hughes, G. (2007). Using Blended Learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3). 349-363

  • 19. Knight, J. (2005). Borderless, Offshore, Transnational and Crossborder Education: Definition and Data Dilemmas Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. London: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. Retrieved December 6, 2015, from http://www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/view_details?id=35

  • 20. Mason, R. (2007). Internationalizing education. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 583-591). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • 21. Marshall, S. (2006). New Zealand tertiary institution e-learning capability: Informing and guiding elearning architectural change and development. Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Education. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/

  • 22. Marshall, S. (2013). Using the e-learning Maturity Model to Identify Good Practice in E-Learning. Proceedings of the 30th Ascilite Conference, Sydney, Australia, 546-556. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/sydney13/program/papers/Marshall.pdf

  • 23. Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2007) Benchmarking International E-learning Capability with the E-Learning Maturity Model. Proceedings of EDUCAUSE in Australasia 2007, Melbourne, Australia.

  • 24. McLoughlin, C. (1999). Culturally responsive technology use: developing an on-line community of learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 231-245.

  • 25. Nisbett, R. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently...And why. New York: Free Press.

  • 26. Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 1-10. Retrieved December 7, 2016, from http://www.ifets.info/journals/6_2/1.html

  • 27. National Teacher Center (2014). Ten reasons to have a high-quality teacher induction program. Retrieved December 8, 2016, from https://newteachercenter.org/blog/2014/05/04/ten-reasons-to-have-a-high-quality-teacherinduction- program/

  • 28. Oblinger, D., Barone, C., & Hawkins, B. (2001). Distributed Education and Its Challenges: An overview. American Council on Education Center for Policy Analysis. Retrievd December 3, 2015, from http://www.cibhs.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/distributed_education_and_its_challenges_an_overview.pdf

  • 29. OECD and World Bank (2002). Developing capacity through cross-border tertiary education OECD and World Bank. Paris and New York: OECD and World Bank. Retrieved December 2, 2015, from http://www.iau-aiu.net/sites/all/files/Cross-border_HE_OECD.pdf

  • 30. Oliver, R. (2005). Quality assurance and elearning: Blue skies and pragmatism. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 13(3), 173-187. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://repository.alt.ac.uk/95/1/ALT_J_Vol13_No3_2005_Quality_assurance_and_e_learni.pdf

  • 31. Parrish, P., & Linder-VanBerschot, J. (2010). Cultural Dimensions of Learning: Addressing the Challenges of Multicultural Instruction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/809/1497

  • 32. Reeves, T., & Reeves, P. (1993). Effective dimensions of interactive learning on the World Wide Web. In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 59-66). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

  • 33. Santally, M. (2005). From Face-to-Face Classrooms to Innovative Computer-Mediated Pedagogies: Observations from the Field. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(4). Retrieved December 8, 2016 from http://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v3/n4/from-face-to-faceclassrooms-to-innovative-computer-mediated-pedagogies-observations-from-the-field

  • 34. Santally, M., Rajabalee, Y., & Cooshna-Naik, D. (2012). Learning Design Implementation for Distance e-Learning: Blending Rapid e-Learning Techniques with Activity-based Pedagogies to Design and Implement a Socio-constructivist Environment. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 2012(II). Retrieved December 3, 2015, from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2012&halfyear=2&article=521

  • 35. Santally, M. I., Sungkur, K., Fagonee, I., Swarts, P., & Mikkonen, J. (2011). A Situational Analysis of Education, ICT, Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Development towards Knowledge Societies in Mauritius.

  • 36. Santally, M. (2013). The e-Learning Initiative at the University of Mauritius: Scenarios of the future. International Journal of Science and Applied information Technology, 2(2), Special Issue of ICET4E 2013, 38-49. Retrieved December 8, 2016, from http://www.warse.org/pdfs/2013/icet4esp07.pdf

  • 37. Schneider, D. (2003). Conception and implementation of rich pedagogical scenarios through collaborative portal sites: clear focus and fuzzy edges. Proceedings of the International Conference on Open & Online Learning, ICOOL 2003, Mauritius.

  • 38. Seldin, P. (1997). Using Student Feedback to Improve Teaching. Retrieved December 14, 2015, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/podimproveacad/393

  • 39. Senkondo, C., & Twinomugisha, A. (2011). A Situational Analysis of Education, ICT, Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Development towards Knowledge Societies in Tanzania.

  • 40. Tapper, H. (2010). Science and Technology Policies in Networked Environment: Case of Finland and South Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2(3), 229-240.

  • 41. Vincent-Lancrin, S., & Pfotenhauer, S. (2012). Guidelines for quality provision in cross-border higher education: where do we stand? OECD Publications. Retrieved December 2, 2015, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/workingpapers

  • 42. Visser, J. (2007). Learning in a global society. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • 43. West, P., Daniel, J., & Lesperance, J. (2009). The Virtual University for the Small States of the Commonwealth (VUSSC) and its Transnational Qualifications Framework (TQF). Proceedings of the 3rd Quality Congress, Dubai.

  • 44. Wighting, J. (2006). Effects of computer use on high school students’ sense of community. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 371-379.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search