ICT Capacity Building: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Rwandan Policies from Higher Education Perspective

Jean Claude Byungura 1 , Henrik Hansson 1 , Kamuzinzi Masengesho 2  and Thashmee Karunaratne 1
  • 1 Stockholm University, DSV, Sweden
  • 2 University of Rwanda, Rwanda


With the development of technology in the 21st Century, education systems attempt to integrate technology-based tools to improve experiences in pedagogy and administration. It is becoming increasingly prominent to build human and ICT infrastructure capacities at universities from policy to implementation level. Using a critical discourse analysis, this study investigates the articulation of ICT capacity building strategies from both national and institutional ICT policies in Rwanda, focusing on the higher education. Eleven policy documents were collected and deeply analyzed to understand which claims of ICT capacity building are made. The analysis shows that strategies for building ICT capacities are evidently observed from national level policies and only in two institutional policies (KIST and NUR). Among 25 components of ICT capacity building used, the ones related to human capacity are not plainly described. Additionally, neither national nor institutional policy documents include the creation of financial schemes for students to acquire ICT tools whilst learners are key stakeholders. Although there is some translation of ICT capacity building strategies from national to some institutional policies, planning for motivation and provision of incentives to innovators is not stated in any of the institutional policies and this is a key to effective technology integration.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Aczel, J. C., Peake, S. R., & Hardy, P. (2008). Designing capacity-building in e-learning expertise: Challenges and strategies. Computers & Education, 50(2), 499-510.

  • 2. Akbaba-Altun, S. (2006). Complexity of integrating computer technologies into education in Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 176-187.

  • 3. Al-Yaseen, H., Hourani, M., & Al-Jaghoub, S. (2012). Success and Failure of e-Learning Projects: Alignment of Vision and Reality, Change and Culture. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3(2), 277-284.

  • 4. Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing Technological Change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • 5. Bates, T. (2001). The continuing evolution of ICT capacity: The implications for education. In F. Glen (Ed.), The changing faces of virtual education (pp. 29-46). COL. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/39

  • 6. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843-855.

  • 7. Brown, G. & Yule, G. (2008). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.

  • 8. Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • 9. Daniel, J. S. (1996). Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. Psychology Press.

  • 10. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

  • 11. Farrell, G. (2007). Survey of ICT and Education in Africa: Rwanda Country Report. Retrieved from https://www.infodev.org/infodev-files/resource/InfodevDocuments_423.pdf

  • 12. Freeman, B. (2014). Benchmarking Australian and New Zealand university meta-policy in an increasingly regulated tertiary environment. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(1), 74-87.

  • 13. Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

  • 14. Gevaert, R. (2012). A sustainable model for ICT capacity building in developing countries. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Large Installation System Administration: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques. 123-134. USENIX Association.

  • 15. Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204.

  • 16. Government of Rwanda (2013) Low no 71/2013 of 10/09/2013 establishing the University of Rwanda and determining its mission, powers, organization and functioning, Official Gazette no 38 of 23/09/2013. (pp.34-54). Retrieved on 17 August 2015 from http://www.mineduc.gov.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/Laws__UR_and_HEC-2.pdf

  • 17. Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3), 287-299.

  • 18. Henderson, M., Bellis, N., Cerovac, M., & Lancaster, G. (2013). Collaborative inquiry: building pre-service teachers’ capacity for ICT pedagogical integration. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 69-75.

  • 19. Hernandez, B., Montaner, T., Sese, F. J., & Urquizu, P. (2011). The role of social motivations in e-learning: How do they affect usage and success of ICT interactive tools? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2224-2232.

  • 20. InfoDev (2010). Information and Communication Technology for Education in India and South Asia, Essay III, Capacity Building for ICT in Education. Retrieved August 17, 2015, from http://www.infodev.org/infodev-files/resource/InfodevDocuments_888.pdf

  • 21. Jordan, K. (2011). Framing ICT, teachers and learners in Australian school education ICT policy. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 417-431.

  • 22. Jowi, J. O. (2009). Internationalization of higher education in Africa: Developments, emerging trends, issues and policy implications. Higher Education Policy, 22(3), 263-281.

  • 23. Keengwe, J., Kidd, T., & Kyei-Blankson, L. (2009). Faculty and technology: Implications for faculty training and technology leadership. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 23-28.

  • 24. Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian journal of educational technology, 24(1), 108-122.

  • 25. Kozma, R. B., & Voogt, J. (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: a global perspective: a report of the Second Information Technology in Education Study, Module 2. ISTE.

  • 26. Kozma, R. B. (2005). National policies that connect ICT-based education reform to economic and social development. Human Technology: In an interdisciplinary journal on humans in ICT environments, 1(2), 117-156.

  • 27. Kozma, R. B. (2008). Comparative analysis of policies for ICT in education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1083-1096). Springer.

  • 28. Larson, R. C., & Murray, M. E. (2008). Open Educational Resources for Blended Learning in High Schools: Overcoming Impediments in Developing Countries. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(1), 85-103.

  • 29. Lloyd, M. M. (2008). Uncertainty and certainty: The visions and roadmaps of ICT educational policy. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 20(3), 13-21.

  • 30. Marshall, G., & Ruohonen, M. (Eds.). (1998). Capacity building for IT in education in developing countries. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • 31. Means, B., & Olson, K. (1995). Technology’s role in education reform: Findings from a national study of innovating schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

  • 32. Ministry of Education (2008). ICT in Education Policy “Draft”. Kigali: Government of Rwanda.

  • 33. Nachmias, R., Mioduser, D., Cohen, A., Tubin, D., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2004). Factors involved in the implementation of pedagogical innovations using technology. Education and Information Technologies, 9(3), 291-308.

  • 34. Nichols, M. (2008). Institutional perspectives: The challenges of e-learning diffusion. British journal of educational technology, 39(4), 598-609.

  • 35. Ojo, S., & Awuah, B. (1998). Building resource capacity for IT education and training in schools: The case of Botswana. In G. Marshall & M. Ruohonen (Eds.), Capacity building for IT in education in developing countries (pp. 27-38). Springer US.

  • 36. Owens, T. (2012). Hitting the nail on the head: the importance of specific staff development for effective blended learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(4), 389-400.

  • 37. Owston, R. (2007). Contextual factors that sustain innovative pedagogical practice using technology: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 8(1), 61-77.

  • 38. Plessis, A., & Webb, P. (2012). Teachers’ Perceptions about their Own and their Schools’ Readiness for Computer Implementation: A South African Case Study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 312-325.

  • 39. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 773-784.

  • 40. Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195.

  • 41. Romeo, G., Lloyd, M., & Downes, T. (2012). Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF): Building the ICT in education capacity of the next generation of teachers in Australia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 949-964.

  • 42. Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. Research in Learning Technology, 13(3), 201-218.

  • 43. Siemens, G. (2014). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.learningnetwork.ac.nz/shared/professionalReading/TRCONN2011.pdf

  • 44. Sife, A. S., Lwoga, E. T., & Sanga, C. (2007). New Technologies for Teaching and Learning: Challenges for Higher Learning Institutions in Developing Countries. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 3(2). Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20070705232755/http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=246&layout=html

  • 45. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), 1183-1202.

  • 46. Taguma, M. (2006). Quality of e-learning in tertiary education: Managing a balance between divergence and convergence. In U.-D. Ehlers & J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on Quality and Standardisation in E-Learning (pp. 465-483). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

  • 47. Tanrikulu, Z., Tugcu, C., & Yilmaz, S. (2010). E-University: Critical success factors. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1253-1259.

  • 48. Taylor, J. A., & Newton, D. (2012). Beyond blended learning: a case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 54-60.

  • 49. Tondeur, J., Van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 212-223.

  • 50. UNESCO (2011). UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers, Paris. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002134/213475e.pdf

  • 51. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.

  • 52. Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2(1), 62-86.

  • 53. Valcke, M. (2004). ICT in higher education: An uncomfortable zone for institutes and their policies. Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, 20-35.

  • 54. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (Chapter 1). London: SAGE Publications.


Journal + Issues