The Pygmalion Effect is the positive form of self-fulfilling prophecy and shows how teacher expectations influence student performance. According to this phenomenon, higher expectations can lead to an increase in performance. In this research qualitative methodology was adopted both in data collection, and in analysis, in order to investigate the impact of the Pygmalion Effect in distance adult learning. Observation was held in two Contact Sessions of the Postgraduate Module for Open and Distance Education (EKP65) of the School of Humanities at the Hellenic Open University (HOU). Also, 22 interviews were conducted, 6 with Tutors/Advisors and 16 with students of the same Postgraduate Module. The data analysis indicates that both Tutors/Advisors and postgraduate students shape form their expectations based on the behaviour as reflected in their first contact (telephone contact, face-to-face contact, written contact through the CV). Expectations originally are positive, though this could change due to mismatched following behaviour. Tutor’s expectations are expressed in verbal and non-verbal ways both in written and face-to-face communication. However, it is the non-verbal behaviour - and mainly the encouragement and the support towards the students - that influences their positive mood and attitude towards the learning object and distance learning itself. In conclusion, not to reject the educational trend according to which the adult learner has developed selfmotivation, we accept that Tutor’s expectations reflected in encouragement and support towards the student may influence the learning process.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Blakey, M. L. (1970). The Relationship between Teacher Prophecy and Teacher Verbal Behavior and Their Effect upon Adult Student Achievement. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 051125 (19/10/2012)
2. Brophy, J. (1982). Research on the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy and Teacher Expectations. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 221530 (15/11/2010)
3. Coleman, L., & Jussim, L. (1983). Perusing Teacher Expectations: A Closer Look at Affect- Attribution Links. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 239161 (15/11/2010).
4. Cooper, J. (1971). Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in the Classroom: An Attempt to Discover the Progress by Which Expectations Are Communicated. Final Report. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 063453 (15/10/2012).
5. Cooper, H., Good, T., Blakey, S., Hinkel, G., Burger, J., Sterling, J., & Baron, R. (1979). Understanding Pygmalion: The Social Psychology of Self-Fulfilling Classroom Expectations. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 182642 (10/10/2012).
6. Dominguez, P. S., & Ridley, D. R. (2001). Education; Psychology and mental health. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(1), 15-19.
7. Giannoudis, C., Digelidis, N., & Papaioannou, A. (2009). Climate Motivation and Perceived Behavior of physical education teachers to disciplined - unruly students. Inquiries in Physical Education & Sport, 7(1), 10-21
8. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1973). Looking in Classrooms. New York: Harper and Row
9. Hecht, M., & Strum, I. (1974). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: An Adaption. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 135464 (19/10/2012).
10. Lavoie, J., & Adams, G. R. (1973). Pygmalion in the Classroom: An Experimental Investigation of the Characteristics of Children on Teacher Expectancy. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 088973 (15/10/2012).
11. Mallet, M.-A. (2006). Quelle estime de soi chez les élèves bons, moyens et en difficulté? Paper presented at the 8e Biennale de l’ éducation et de la formation, Lyon, 11-14 avril, 2006.
12. Manzoni, J. F., & Barsoux, J. L. (1998). Inside the Golem Effect: How bosses can kill their subordinates motivation. Fontainebleau: INSEAD
13. Meena, L. I. (2007). Overcoming barriers in developing conversation skills: A pedagogical perspective. Proceedings of the 2007 Association for Business Communication Annual Convention, Association for Business Communication.
14. Merle, P., (2004). Mobilisation et découragement scolaires: l’expérience subjective des élèves. Education et Sociétés, 13, 193-208.
15. Moore, M. G. (1972). Leamer autonomy: The second dimension of independent leaming. Convergence, 2, 76-88.
16. Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan, (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge.
17. Prihadi, K., Hairul, N. I., & Hazri, J. (2010). Students’ Self-Esteem and their Perception of Teacher Behavior: A Study of Between-Class Ability Grouping. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(2), 707-724.
18. Rathert, G., & Reed, D. (2001). The Effectiveness of Electronically Communicated Encouragement on Student Performance. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 471187 (12/10/2012).
19. Rhem, J. (1999). Pygmalion In The Classroom. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 8(2).
20. Rist, R. C. (1977). On Understanding the Process of Schooling: The Contributions of Labeling Theory. In J. Karabel & A. H. Hasley (Εds.), Power and Ideology in Education (p. 292-305). New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Rosenthal, H. P. (1975). The Effect of Teacher Expectancy Upon the Achievement and Intelligence Test Scores of Adult Students. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 110850 (9/10/2012).
22. Rosenthal, R., & Babad, E. Y. (1985). Pygmalion in the gymnasium. Educational Leadership, 43(1), 36-39.
23. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16-20.
24. Skilbeck, W., & Collins, B. (1976). Transmission and Compliance with Expectations in a Simulated Supervisor - Worker Interaction. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 140137 (15/11/2012).
25. Sprouse, J., & Webb J. (1994). The Pygmalion Effect and Its Influence on the Grading and Gender Assignment on Spelling and Essay Assessments. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov, No ED 374096 (20/10/2012).
26. Suplicz, S. (2005). Psychological Aspects of E-learning. Paper presented at the VELVITT Conference, 6th Meeting, Heraklion, 9-12 October 2005.
27. Trouilloud, D., & Sarrazin, P. (2003). Les connaissances actuelles sur l’ effet Pygmalion: processus, poids et modulateurs. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 145, 89-119.
28. Zanna, M., Sheras, P., Cooper, J., & Shaw, C. (1975). Pygmalion and Galatea: The Interactive Effect of Teacher and Student Expectancies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 279-287.