Millions of users around the world have registered on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) offered by hundreds of universities (and other organizations) worldwide. Creating and offering these courses costs thousands of pounds. However, at present, revenue generated by MOOCs is not sufficient to offset these costs. The sustainability of MOOCs is a pressing concern as they incur not only upfront creation costs but also maintenance costs to keep content relevant, as well as on-going facilitation support costs while a course is running and re-running. At present, charging a fee for certification seems to be a popular business model adopted by leading platform providers.
In this position paper, the authors explore possible business models for courses, along with their advantages and disadvantages, by conducting a literature study and applying personal insights gained from attending various MOOC discussion fora. Some business models discussed here are: the Freemium model, sponsorships, initiatives and grants, donations, merchandise, the sale of supplementary material, selective advertising, data-sharing, follow-on events, and revenue from referrals. This paper looks at the sustainability of MOOCS as opposed to the sustainability of MOOC platforms, while observing the tight link between them.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2014). MOOC’s business models: turning black swans into gray swans. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication, 2014, May, 45-49.
3. Bulfin, S., Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2014) Making ‘MOOCs’: The construction of a new digital higher education within news media discourse. The International Review of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 15(5), 290-305.
4. Burd, E. L., Smith, S. P., & Reisman, S. (2014). Exploring Business Models for MOOCs in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 40(1), 37-49.
27. Liyanagunawardena, T. R. (2012). Information communication technologies and distance education in Sri Lanka: a case study of two universities. PhD thesis, University of Reading.
28. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227.
29. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., Rassool, N., & Williams, S. A. (2014). Developing government policies for distance education: lessons learnt from two Sri Lankan case studies. International Review of Education, 60(6), 821-839. ISSN 1573-0638 doi: 10.1007/s11159-014-9442-0
35. Perez-Garcia, M. (2009). MUVEnation: A European peer-to-peer learning programme for teacher training in the use of MUVEs in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 561-567. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00951.x
36. Phillips, P. P., & Jack. J. (2005). Return on Investment Basics (ASTD Training Basics). Virginia: ASTD Press.