Research Trends in Turkish Distance Education: A Content Analysis of Dissertations, 1986-2014

Aras Bozkurt 1 , Evrim Genc Kumtepe 1 , Alper Tolga Kumtepe 1 , İrem Erdem Aydın 1 , Müjgan Bozkaya 1  and Cengiz Hakan Aydın 1
  • 1 Anadolu University [], Turkey


This paper presents a content analytic approach on doctoral dissertations in the field of distance education in Turkish Higher Education context from the years of 1986 through 2014. A total of 61 dissertations were examined to explore keywords, academic discipline, research areas, theoretical/conceptual frameworks, research designs, research models, tests and analyses, data collection tools, participants, variables/research interests, and leading contributor institutions. It is believed that this study can be beneficial to the field of distance education in Turkish context to identify research trends and set a research agenda by exploring dissertations that were published between 1986 and 2014.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a Theory of Online Learning. In T. Anderson (ed.), The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, (pp. 45-74). Athabasca University Press.

  • 2. Anderson, T. and Zawacki-Richter, O. (2014). Conclusion: Towards a Research Agenda. In O. Zawacki-Richter & T. Anderson (eds.), Online distance education: Towards a research agenda. Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.

  • 3. Bozkurt, A.; Akgun-Ozbek, E.; Onrat-Yilmazel, S.; Erdogdu, E.; Ucar, H.; Guler, E.; Sezgin, S.; Karadeniz, A.; Sen-Ersoy, N.; Goksel-Canbek, N.; Dincer, G.; Ari, S.; Aydin, C. (2015). Trends in distance education research: A content analysis of journals 2009-2013. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1). Retrieved from

  • 4. Berge, Z.L. and Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. In American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), (pp. 5-19).

  • 5. Daniel, J.S. (1998). Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. Psychology Press.

  • 6. Davies, R.; Howell, S. and Petrie, J. (2010). A review of trends in distance education scholarship at research universities in North America, 1998-2007. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3), (pp. 42-56).

  • 7. Hauser, L. (2013). Qualitative Research in Distance Education: An Analysis of Journal Literature 2005–2012. In American Journal of Distance Education, 27(3), (pp. 155-164).

  • 8. Hussain Shah, S.M. and Gufran, T. (2013). Research Trends in Higher Education: A Content Analysis. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of Asian Association of Open Universities: AAOU2013.

  • 9. Keegan, D. (1983). Six distance education theorists. Hagen, Germany: FernUniversität, ZIFF.

  • 10. Koble, M.A. and Bunker, E.L. (1997). Trends in research and practice: An examination of the American Journal of Distance Education 1987 to 1995. In American Journal of Distance Education, 11(2), (pp. 19-38).

  • 11. Kocdar, S. and Karadag, N. (2015). Identifying and Examining Degree-Granting Programs for Distance Education Experts: A Preliminary Analysis. In G. Eby & T.V. Yuzer (eds.), Identification, Evaluation, and Perceptions of Distance Education Experts, (pp. 190-210). IGI Global.

  • 12. Lee, Y.; Driscoll, M.P. and Nelson, D.W. (2004). The past, present, and future of research in distance education: Results of a content analysis. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), (pp. 225-241).

  • 13. Panda, S. (1992). Distance educational research in India: Stock-taking, concerns and prospects. In Distance Education, 13(2), (pp. 309–26).

  • 14. Perraton, H. (1988). A theory for distance education. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan & B. Holmberg (eds.), Distance education: International perspectives, (pp. 34-45). New York: Routledge.

  • 15. Porter, J. (1992). Audience and rhetoric. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall.

  • 16. de Olivera Neto, J.D. and dos Santos, E.M. (2010). Analysis of the publications, research topics in a sample of the Brazilian distance education publications, 1992 to 2007. In American Journal of Distance Education, 24, (pp. 119-134). Retrieved from

  • 17. Ritzhaupt, A.; Stewart, M.; Smith, P. and Barron, A. (2010). An investigation of distance education in North American research literature using co-word analysis. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), (pp. 37-60). Retrieved from

  • 18. Rourke, L. and Szabo, M. (2002). A content analysis of the Journal of Distance Education 1986-2001. In Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), (pp. 63-74).

  • 19. Salar, H.C. (2009). Trends in distance education in Turkey. In the Proceedings of The 23rd ICDE World Conference on Open and Distance Learning Including the 2009 EADTU Annual Conference. Maastricht: Open University. Retrieved from

  • 20. Simonson, M.; Schlosser, C. and Hanson, D. (1999). Theory and distance education: A new discussion. In American Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), (pp. 60-75).

  • 21. Tuncay, N. and Uzunboylu, H. (2010). Trend of Distance Education in the last three Decades. In World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(1), (pp. 55-67).

  • 22. Zawacki-Richter, O. (2009). Research Areas in Distance Education: A Delphi Study. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3).

  • 23. Zawacki-Richter, O. and Anderson, T. (2014). Online distance education: Towards a research agenda. Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.

  • 24. Zawacki-Richter, O. and von Prümmer, C. (2010). Gender and collaboration patterns in distance education research. In Open Learning, 25(2), (pp. 95-114).

  • 25. Zawacki-Richter, O.; Bäcker, E.M. and Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. In International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 10(6).


Journal + Issues