A Systematic Review Of The Socio-Ethical Aspects Of Massive Online Open Courses

  • 1 University of the West of England, United Kingdom

English Abstract

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer learners across the globe unprecedented access to education. Through sophisticated e-learning technologies and web approaches, MOOCs attract massive scale participation and global interest. Some commercial ventures place social equality at the heart of their missions, claiming to empower communities by making education accessible and affordable. In reality, the socio-ethical impact of MOOCs has not been investigated fully, so it is not clear whether they meet these aspirations.

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to examine the socio-ethical dimensions of MOOCs. The results showed a paucity of literature specifically addressing the subject in question, although there was evidence of many innovative approaches underway to examine new paradigms within learning analytics and online study behaviour that are emerging because of MOOCs. A small number of papers explored new pedagogic approaches such as conducting peer assessment on a massive scale, and how learning groups connect and establish on the open web.

To conclude, this paper begins to provide a framework on which to consider the socio-ethical dimensions of MOOCs. There is a need for good quality research to provide an evidence-base to ensure MOOCs deliver a socially equitable learning experience.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Altbach, P.G. (2014). MOOCs as neocolonialism: who controls knowledge? In International Higher Education, 75(Spring), (pp. 5-7). Available online at http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/view/5426/4854

  • 2. Bearman, M.; Smith, C.D.; Carbone, A.; Slade, S.; Baik, C.; Hughes-Warrington, M. and Neumann, D.L. (2012). Systematic review methodology in higher education. In Higher Education Research and Development, 31(5), (pp. 625-640). doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.702735

  • 3. Brey, P. (2006). Social and ethical dimensions of computer-mediated education. In Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 2, (pp. 91-102). ISSN: 1477-996X

  • 4. Camilleri, A.F.; Ehlers, U.D. and Pawlowski, J. (2014). State of the art review of quality issues related to Open Educational Resources (OER). European Commission Report. Available online at http://is.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/EAP/documents/201405JRC88304.pdf

  • 5. Conole, G. (2013). A new classification for MOOCs. Web log post, 2013, June 4. Available online at http://mooc.efquel.org/a-new-classification-for-moocs-grainne-conole/

  • 6. Cormier, D. (2008). The CCK08 MOOC – Connectivism course, 1/4 way. Web log post, 2008, October 2. Available online at http://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/10/02/the-cck08-mooc-connectivism-course-14-way/

  • 7. Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2011). Higher education: Putting students at the heart of the system. Available online at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/putting-students-at-the-heart-of-higher-education

  • 8. Dima, A.M.; Vasilache, S.; Ghinea, V. and Agoston, S. (2013). A model of academic social responsibility. In Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, (38 E), (pp. 23-43).

  • 9. Evans, J. and Benefield, P. (2001). Systematic reviews of education research: Does the medical model fit? In British Educational Research, 27(5), (pp. 527-541). doi: 10.1080/01411920120095717

  • 10. Hew, K.F. and Cheung, W.S. (2012). Student participation in online discussions: Challenges, solutions, and future research. New York: Springer.

  • 11. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1). Available online at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1651/2774

  • 12. Kernohan, D. (2012). Open as in door or open as in heart? #mooc. Web log post, 2012, May 14. Available online at http://followersoftheapocalyp.se/open-as-in-door-or-open-as-in-heart-mooc/

  • 13. Liyanagunawardena, T.; Adams, A.; Rassool, N. and Williams, S. (2013a). Telecentres and e-learning. In British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), (pp. E156-E158). ISSN 1467-8535, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12020.

  • 14. Liyanagunawardena, T.R.A.; Adams, A.A. and Williams, S.A. (2013b). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), (pp. 202-227). Available online at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455/2531

  • 15. Liyanagunawardena, T.R.; Parslow, P. and Williams, S. (2014). Dropout: MOOC participant perspective. In EMOOCs 2014, the Second MOOC European Stakeholders Summit, 10-12 February 2014, Lausanne, Switzerland. Paper Available online at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/36002/2/MOOC%20Dropout%20Participants%20Perspective.pp95-100.pdf

  • 16. Marshall, S. (2014). Exploring the ethical implications of MOOCs. In Distance Education, 35(2), (pp. 250-262). doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917706

  • 17. McAulay, A.; Stewart, B.; Siemens, G. and Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. University of Prince Edward Island. Available online at http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf

  • 18. Means, B.; Toyama, Y.; Murphy, R.; Bakia, M. and Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. US Department of Education. Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Policy and Program Studies Service. ED-04-CO-0040. Available online at http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

  • 19. Molesworth, M.; Nixon, E. and Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. In Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), (pp. 277-287).

  • 20. Morrison, J.L. and Khan, B.H. (2003). The global e-learning framework: An interview with Badrul Khan. In The Technology Source, May/June 2003. Available online at http://technologysource.org/article/global_elearning_framework/

  • 21. Neary, M. and Winn, J. (2009). The student as producer: reinventing the student experience in higher education. In The future of higher education: policy, pedagogy and the student experience, (pp. 192-210). Continuum, London. ISBN 1847064728.

  • 22. Nyoni, J. (2013). The viral nature of massive open online courses (MOOCs) in open and distance learning: discourses of quality, mediation and control. In Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3). doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n3p665.

  • 23. Peters, R.S. (1971). Ethics and education. London: Unwin University Books.

  • 24. Rolfe, V. (2013). MOOCs and social responsibility toward learners. In OPEN-ED Open Education Conference 2013. Utah, Park City, November 6-8, 2013. http://vivrolfe.com/uncategorized/mooc-research-on-student-experience-and-social-responsibility-toward-learners/

  • 25. Rolfe, V. (2015). Ethical dimensions of massive open online courses. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • 26. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] (1998). Higher education in the twenty-first century vision and action. In World Conference on Higher Education: UNESCO Paris 5–9 October 1998. Volume 1, final report. Available online at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001163/116345e.pdf

  • 27. Sun, P.; Tsai, R.J.; Finger, G.; Chen, Y.; Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. In Computers and Education, 50(4), (pp. 1183-1202). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007.

  • 28. The White House (2014). Higher education. Available online at http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/higher-education

  • 29. Williams, B. (2013). Roll call: taking a census of MOOC students. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Massive Open Online Courses at the 16th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Memphis, TN. Paper Available online at http://people.csail.mit.edu/zp/moocshop2013/paper_18.pdf

  • 30. Willging, P.A. and Johnson, S.D. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. In Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), (pp. 115-127).

  • 31. Yuan, L. and Powell, S. (2013). MOOCS and open education: Implications for higher education. A white paper. (Jisc CETIS 2013:WP01). Available online at http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667


Journal + Issues