Case for ‘Passive’ Learning – the ‘Silent’ Community of Online Learners

  • 1 The Open University [http://www.open.ac.uk], United Kingdom

Abstract

This paper examines two modules within the Faculty of Social Sciences at The Open University (OU) and considers the extent to which ‘passive’ learning may be taking place. Both are level one modules (first year undergraduate) and use a combination of asynchronous (forums) and synchronous (Blackboard Collaborate technology, branded ‘OU Live’) technologies for teaching. The data reveals that student ‘passive engagement’ with forums (reading messages in a forum, but not ‘actively’ posting, colloquially known as lurking) is far higher than ‘active engagement’ (posting in the forum). The data also shows that participation in OU Live is very low. This initially suggests that teaching and learning strategies needs to be reconsidered, to encourage or increase ‘active engagement’. However, the data, alongside literature, also suggests that some students may find value in engaging ‘passively’. From the perspective of a Higher Education (HE) institute such as the OU, this may have implications for the tuition delivery strategy used to deliver the module material, as well as how staff development occurs for the tutors that deliver the material. For example, rather than focus a significant effort on encouraging students to participate in active forum use, the emphasis may need to be shifted to ensuring that appropriate/sufficient material is available to ‘passive engagers’.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Bayne, S. (2005). Deceit, desire and control: the identities of learners and teachers in cyberspace. In R. Land and S. Bayne (eds.), Education in Cyberspace, (pp. 21-41). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.

  • 2. Beaudoin, M. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the ‘invisible’ online student. In The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), (pp.147-155).

  • 3. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.

  • 4. Blackboard (2013). Blackboard Collaborate. Available online at http://www.blackboard.com/Sites/International/EMEA/Platforms/Blackboard- Collaborate.html

  • 5. Conole, G.; Dyke, M.; Oliver, M.; Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. In Computers and Education, 43(1-2), (pp.17-33).

  • 6. Dennen, V. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behaviour. In Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(4), (pp.1624-1633).

  • 7. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. In Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), (pp.133-56).

  • 8. Engeström, Y. (2007). From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. In J. Hughes; N. Jewson; L. Unwin (eds.), Communities of Practice: Critical Perspectives, (pp.41-54). London: Routledge.

  • 9. New Media Consortium (2012). Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

  • 10. Jones, C. (2004). Networks and learning: communities, practices and the metaphor of networks. In Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(1), (pp.81-93).

  • 11. Kennedy, G.; Gray, K.; Tse, J. (2008). ‘Net Generation’ medical students: technological experiences of pre-clinical and clinical students. In Medical Teacher, (30)1, (pp.10-16).

  • 12. McKendree, J.; Stenning, K.; Mayes, T.; Lee, J. and Cox, R. (1998). Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(2), (pp.110-119).

  • 13. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. In On the Horizon, 9(5), (pp.1-6).

  • 14. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.

  • 15. Seely Brown, J.; Collins, A.; Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. In Educational Researcher, 18(1), (pp.32-42).

  • 16. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. In Educational Researcher, 27(2), (pp.4-13).

  • 17. Smith, D.; Middleton, D. (2013). ‘It needs to be better than face to face’: Introducing Elluminate into a social sciences distance learning programme. In Enhancing Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 5(3), (pp.3-14).

  • 18. Smith, D.; Smith, K. (2013). Fifty shades of forums: the trouble with fantasy and dominance in asynchronous teaching and learning. In Proceedings of the UNISA Cambridge International Conference on Open, Distance and eLearning (University of South Africa), 2013.

  • 19. Thorpe, M. (2008). Effective online interaction: mapping course design to bridge from research to practice. In Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), (pp. 57-72).

  • 20. Webb, E.; Jones, A.; Barker, P. van Schaik, P. (2004). Using e-learning dialogues in higher education. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), (pp. 93-103).

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search