The Effects of Social Networking Sites in Distance Learning on Learners’ Academic Achievements

Büşra Özmen and Bünyamin Atıcı 1
  • 1 Fırat University, Education Faculty, Department of CEIT, Elazığ, Turkey


The general aim of this study is to determine the effects of learning management systems supported by social networking sites on learners’ academic achievements in distance education. The study group consisted of 75 undergraduate students from a state university in eastern Turkey. The data for the study, in which an experimental research design was used, were collected through an achievement test, which consisted of 40 multiple-choice questions. Within the scope of the research, a learning management system and a social networking site were utilized in a distance education course. As a result of the research, it was seen that social network supported distance learning activities created a more positive effect on the achievements of the learners than the distance learning activities. Also, it was determined that social network supported distance education activities were more effective in the acquisition of behaviours at the knowledge level of the cognitive domain than activities in other groups; however, the groups were not different from each other in relation to the acquisition of behaviours at the comprehension level of the cognitive domain. In this context, it was concluded that the learning management systems used in distance education should be supported by social networking sites to increase the academic achievement of learners.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Aghili, M.; Palaniappan, A.K.; Kamali, K.; Aghabozorgi, S.; Sardareh, A.S. (2014). Unifying informal and formal learning environments: Educational use of social network sites through implementing community of inquiry framework. In International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 4(3), (pp. 191-196).

  • 2. Anderson, T. (2005). Distance learning-social software’s killer ap? In proceedings of Conference of the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia (ODLAA). Adelaide, South Australia: University of South Australia.

  • 3. Bartlett-Bragg, A. (2006). Reflections on pedagogy: Reframing practice to foster informal learning with social software. Retrieved from on 10.07.2012.

  • 4. Benson, V. (2008). Is the digital generation ready for Web 2.0-based learning. In M.D. Lytras, E. Damiani, P. Ordóñez de Pablos (eds.), The Open Knowledge Society. A Computer Science and Information Systems Manifesto.

  • 5. Brady, K.P.; Holcomb, L.B.; Smith, B.V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in Education. In Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), (pp. 151-170).

  • 6. Boyd, D.M.; Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. In Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), (pp. 210-230).

  • 7. Cuéllar, M.P.; Delgado, M. and Pegalajar, M.C. (2011). Improving learning management through semantic web and social networks in e-learning environments. In Expert Systems with Activities, 38, (pp. 4181-4189).

  • 8. DeSchryver, M.; Mishra, P.; Koehler, M.; Francis, A.P. (2009). Moodle vs. Facebook: Does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction? In proceedings of The Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2009, (pp. 329-336).

  • 9. Despotovic-Zrakic, M.S. (2011). Fostering engineering e-learning courses with social network services. In the proceedings of 19th Telecommunications Forum TELFOR 2011, (pp. 22-125). 22-24 November 2011, Serbia, Belgrade.

  • 10. DiVall, M.V. and Kirwin, J.L. (2012). Using Facebook to facilitate course-related discussion between students and faculty members. In American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(2).

  • 11. Feuer, G. (2009). Net generation students and their use of social software: Assessing impacts on information literacy skills and learning at a laptop university. University of Toronto, Department of Theory and Policy Studies Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.

  • 12. Grant, N. (2008). On the usage of social networking software technologies in distance learning education. In K. McFerrin et al. (eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, (pp. 3755-3759). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

  • 13. Greenhow, C.G.; Robelia, B.; Hughes, J. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? In Educational Researcher, 38(4), (pp. 246-259).

  • 14. Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. 6th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • 15. Higher Education Research Institute (2007). Results of the 2007-2008 faculty survey conducted by the Higher Education Research Institute. Retrieved from on 17.08.2012.

  • 16. Hoffman, E.S. (2009). Evaluating social networking tools for distance learning. In proceedings of Technology, Colleges, and Community Worldwide Online Conference, 2009(1), (pp. 92-100).

  • 17. Holcomb, L.; Brady, K.; Smith, B. (2010). Ning in Education: Can non-commercial, education-based social networking sites really address the privacy and safety concerns of educators? In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, (pp. 528-531).

  • 18. Iahad, N.A.; Mirabolghasemi, M.; Huspi, S.H. (2012). A blended community of inquiry approach: The usage of social network as a support for course management system. In proceedings of International Conference on Computer & Information Science.

  • 19. Kirschner, P.; Karpinski, A. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. In Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), (pp. 1237-1245).

  • 20. Lane, L. M. (2008). Toolbox or Trap? Course management systems and pedagogy. In EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(2), (pp. 4-6).

  • 21. Lee, M.J.W.; McLoughlin, C. (2010). Beyond distance and time constraints: Applying social networking tools and Web 2.0 approaches to distance learning. In G. Veletsianos (ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education, (pp. 61-87). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.

  • 22. Lester, J.; Perini, M. (2010). Potential of social networking sites for distance education student engagement. In New Directions for Community Colleges, 2010(150), (pp. 67-77).

  • 23. McLoughlin, C.; Lee, M.J.W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Extending pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In R. Atkinson & C. McBeath (eds.), ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of the 24th ASCILITE Conference, (pp. 664-675). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.

  • 24. Meishar-Tal, H.; Kurtz, G. and Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), (pp. 33-48).

  • 25. Morgan, G. (2003). Key findings: Faculty use of course management systems. Boulder, Colorado: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.

  • 26. Mott, J. (2010). Envisioning the post-LMS era: The Open Learning Network. In Educause Quarterly, 33, (pp. 1-9).

  • 27. Naveh, G.; Tubin, D.; Pliskin, N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective. In The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), (pp. 127-133).

  • 28. New Media Consortium and EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI) (2007). The Horizon Report. The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from on 09.08.2012.

  • 29. Noesgaard, K. (2008). Bridging eLearning and social networks. University of Victoria, Department of Computer Science, Canada.

  • 30. Petrovic, N.; Jeremic, V.; Cirovic, M.; Radojicic, Z. and Milenkovic, N. (2014). Facebook versus Moodle in practice. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 28,(pp. 117-125).

  • 31. Razali, S.N.; Shahbodin, F.; Bakar, N; Hussin, H.; Ahmad, M.H.; Sulajman, N. (2013). Incorporating learning management system with social network sites to support online collaborative learning: Preliminary analysis. In Advances in Visual Informatics, 8237, (pp. 549-557).

  • 32. Rožac, J.; Buendía, F.; Ballester, J.; Kos, A.; Pogačnik, M. (2012). Integration of learning management systems with social networking platforms. In proceedings of eLmL 2012, The Fourth International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-line Learning, (pp. 100-105).

  • 33. Schroeder, J. and Greenbowe, T.J. (2009). The chemistry of Facebook: Using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry laboratory. In Journal of Online Education, 5(4).

  • 34. Smith, B.V. (2009). Use of online educational social networking in a school environment. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.

  • 35. Tess, P.A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) - A literature review. In Computers in Human Behavior, 29, (pp. 60-68).

  • 36. Thompson, J. (2007). Is Education 1.0 Ready for Web 2.0 Students? In Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4).

  • 37. Thoms, B. and Eryılmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. In Computers & Education, 75, (pp. 112-126).

  • 38. Veletsianos, G.; Kimmons, R; French, K. D. (2013). Instructor experiences with a social networking site in a higher education setting: Expectations, frustrations, appropriation, and compartmentalization. In Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), (pp. 255-278).

  • 39. Veletsianos, G.; Navarrete, C. (2012). Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), (pp. 144-166).


Journal + Issues