Introducing a Structured Format for Learner Selfassessment: the Tutor’S Perspective

  • 1 Faculty of Medical Science, Department of Allied and Public Health, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom

Abstract

This paper describes our experience of introducing a structured format for students requesting formative feedback on draft work. Initially the aims were to encourage the development of selfassessment skills in distance-learning students and to develop the dialogue between student and tutor. In 2013 we considered the benefits of this initiative could be applied to campus based students with a similar profile. The experiences of staff involved in this process were collated and the advantages and challenges recorded.

Our experience confirms this process results in high quality, specific and consistent feedback which can impact on students’ success in summative assessment. The development of trust in the process results in useful dialogue and increased self-esteem as students gain confidence in their critical-thinking skills. An unexpected benefit shows students utilise the process to express anxieties about, not only their studies, but personal and work challenges, thereby enabling us to provide additional support.

The most challenging aspect for tutors is the time required to provide feedback in this format. This process highlights distinct benefits for students and in our view these outweigh the issue of tutor time, but resources need to be addressed before it can be used effectively for larger cohorts.

Falls das inline PDF nicht korrekt dargestellt ist, können Sie das PDF hier herunterladen.

  • 1. Andrade, H. and Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting Learning and Achievement through Self- Assessment. In Theory into Practice, 48(1), (pp. 12-19). Available through: EBSCOhost [Accessed 20 August 2014].

  • 2. Beaumont, C.; O’Doherty, M. and Shannon, L., (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning. In Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), (pp. 671-687). Available through: Anglia Ruskin Library Website, http://libweb.anglia.ac.uk [accessed 28 June 2014].

  • 3. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. In Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), (pp. 151-167). Available through: EBSCOhost Professional Development Collection [Accessed 28 June 2014].

  • 4. Carless, D.; Salter, D.; Yang, M. and Lam, J., (2010). Developing sustainable feedback practices. In Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), (pp. 395-407). Available through: EBSCOhost [Accessed 29 June 2014].

  • 5. Cavanaugh, J. (2005). Teaching online - A time comparison. In Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). Available at http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring_81/cavanaugh81.htm

  • 6. Cooper, N.J. (2000). Facilitating learning from formative feedback in level 3 assessment. In Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), (pp. 279-291). Available through: EBSCOhost [18 November 2014].

  • 7. Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. (2004-5). Conditions under which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning. In Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, (pp. 3-31). Available at: https://www.open.ac.uk/fast/pdfs/Gibbs%20and%20Simpson%202004-05.pdf [Accessed 15 November 2014].

  • 8. Gosling, D. and Moon, J. (2002). How to use Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria. Southern England Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer SEEC 3rd.

  • 9. Higgins, R.; Hartley, P. and Skelton, A. (2002). The Conscientious Consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. In Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), (pp. 53-64). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 28 June 2014].

  • 10. McDonald, B. and Boud, D. (2003). The Impact of Self-assessment on Achievement: the effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. In Assessment in Education, 10(2), (pp. 209-220).

  • 11. McGarrell, H. and Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. In ELT Journal, 61(3), (pp. 228-236). Available through: Oxford University Press Journals [accessed 28 June 2014].

  • 12. McKenney, C.; Peffley, E. and Teolis, I., (2010). Comparison of time investment in common teaching practices among three instructional methods. In Teaching Methods, 20(1), (pp. 245-249). Available through: Highwire Press Free [accessed 28 August 2014].

  • 13. Nicol, D.J. and MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. In Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), (pp. 199-218). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 28 June 2014].

  • 14. Panagiotis, A. and Chrysoula, I. (2010). Communication between tutors - students in DL: A case study of the Hellenic Open University. In EURODL, 13(2). Available at http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2010&halfyear=2&article=407.

  • 15. Salmon, G. (2006). e-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. 2nd ed. Oxon: Taylor and Francis Books Ltd.

  • 16. Shute, V.A. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. In Review of Educational Research, 78(1), (pp. 153-189). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 28 June 2014].

  • 17. Simpson, O. (2008). Motivating learners in open and distance learning: do we need a new theory of learner support? In Open Learning, 23(3), (pp.159-170). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 20 November 2014].

  • 18. Tallent-Runnels, M.K.; Thomas, J.A.; Lan, W.Y.; Cooper, S.; Ahern, T.C.; Shaw, S.M.; X, Liu (2006). Teaching courses online: a Review of the research. In Review of Educational Research, 76(1), (pp. 93-135). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 28 June 2014].

  • 19. Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them usable? In Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), (pp. 67-78). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 1 July 2014].

  • 20. Watts, J.H. and Waraker S.M. (2008). When is a student not a student? Issues of identity and conflict on a distance learning work-based nurse education programme. In Learning in Health and Social Care, 7(2), (pp. 105-113). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 29 June 2014].

  • 21. Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. In Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), (pp. 379-394). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 29 June 2014].

  • 22. Wingate, U. (2010). The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic Writing. In Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), (pp. 519-533). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 20 August 2014].

  • 23. Zembylas, M.; Theodorou, M. and Pavlakis, A. (2008). The role of emotions in the experience of online learning: challenges and opportunities. In Educational Media International, 45(2), (pp. 107-117). Available through: EBSCOhost [accessed 20 August 2014].

OPEN ACCESS

Zeitschrift + Hefte

Suche