An Exploratory Study of Emotional Affordance of a Massive Open Online Course

Jeremy C.Y. Cheng 1
  • 1 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong

Abstract

This exploratory study examines emotional affordance of a massive open online course (MOOC). Postings in a discussion forum of a MOOC in computer science are analysed following a research design informed by virtual ethnography. Emotional affordance is investigated, focusing on nonachievement emotions which are not directly linked to achievement activities or outcomes. The study identifies two non-achievement emotions in the MOOC. First, altruistic emotion evolves with the collaborative learning community and possibly compensates for teachers’ minimal emotional intervention in a large, diverse class. Second, intergenerational emotional resonance is observed and this bears a key implication on managing age diversity for the future MOOCs.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Angelaki, C. and Mavroidis, I. (2013). Communication and social presence: The impact on adult learners’ emotion in distance learning. In European Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 16(1), (pp. 78-93). http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2013&halfyear=1&article=563

  • 2. Baytiyeh, H. and Pfaffman, J. (2010). Volunteers in Wikipedia: Why the community matters. In Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), (pp. 128-140).

  • 3. Borup, J.; West, R.E. and Graham, C.R. (2012). Improving online social presence through asynchronous video. In Internet and Higher Education, 15(5), (pp. 195-203).

  • 4. Crook, C. (2011). Versions of computer supported collaborating in higher education. In S.Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices, (pp. 156-171). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

  • 5. Dua, A. (2013). College for all. Voices on Society: The art and science of delivery. Retrieved from the World Wide Web on 11 August 2013 at http://voices.mckinseyonsociety.com/college-for-all/

  • 6. EdX. (2013). About edX. Retrieved from the World Wide Web on 16 February 2013 at https://www.edx.org/about-us

  • 7. Esposito, A. (2012). Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arisen from a hypothetical study on a MOOC. In Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(3), (pp. 315-325).

  • 8. Garrison, D.R.; Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. In Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), (pp. 87-105).

  • 9. Garrison, D.R. and Arbaugh, J.B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. In Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), (pp. 157-172).

  • 10. Gibson, J.J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

  • 11. Graesser, A.C. and D’Mello, S. (2012). Emotions during the learning of difficult material. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, (pp. 183-225).

  • 12. Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. In Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), (pp. 835-854).

  • 13. Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • 14. Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of distance education based on empathy. In M. Moore & W.Anderson (eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, (pp. 79-86). Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

  • 15. John, P. and Sutherland, R. (2005). Affordance, opportunity and the pedagogical implications of ICT. In Educational Review, 57(4), (pp. 405-413).

  • 16. Koutropoulos, A.; Gallagher, M.S.; Abajian, S.C.; Waard, I.; Hogue, R.J.; Keskin, N. and Rodriguez, C.O. (2012). Emotive vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & participant retention. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 15(1). Retrieved from the World Wide Web on 13 July 2013 at http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2012&halfyear=1&article=507

  • 17. Mann, B. (2006). Virtual ethnography and discourse analysis. In B. Mann (ed.), Selected styles in web-based research, (pp.439-455). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

  • 18. Marchand, G.C. and Gutierrez, A.P. (2012). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings. In Internet and Higher Education, 15(5), (pp. 150-160).

  • 19. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. In Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), (pp. 315-341).

  • 20. Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating, the key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.

  • 21. Schutte, N.S.; Malouff, J.N.; Price, I.; Walter, S.; Burke, G.; Wilkinson, K. (2008). Personsituation interaction in adaptive emotional functioning. In Current Psychology, 27(2), (pp. 102-111).

  • 22. Terras, M.M. and Ramsay, J. (2012). The five central psychological challenges facing effective mobile learning. In British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), (pp. 820-832).

  • 23. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. M. Cole, V.John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • 24. Wosnitza, M. and Volet, S. (2005). Origin, direction and impact of emotions in social online learning. In Learning and Instruction, 15(5), (pp. 449-464).

  • 25. Zembylas, M. (2008). Adult learners’ emotions in online learning. In Distance Learning, 29(1), (pp. 71-87).

  • 26. Zembylas, M. and Vrasidas, C. (2004). Emotion, Reason, and Information and Communication Technologies in Education: Some issues in a post-emotional society. In Elearning, 1(1), (pp. 105-127)

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search