Rural Architectural and Planning Forms as a Source of Diversity for Urban Environment (Case Study of Moscow)

Open access


Inclusion of specific rural architectural and planning forms in the urban structure of Moscow is analysed. As a theoretical background, theories of Garden-Cities (Howard, 1902), Rural-urban continuum (Sorokin, Zimmerman, 1929), Slow city (Mayer, Knox, 2009) are considered. Inclusion of rural architectural and planning forms is analysed for different structural elements of Moscow’s urban environment – public spaces, industrial areas, residential areas, street and road network. Authors argue that once included into the structure of the city, rural planning and architectural forms do not disappear, but after the termination of the implementation of their parent species and ways of life, which are really related to agriculture and other “non-urban” activities, they are transformed for integration into urban life and the environment, contributing to an increase in their diversity. This pattern can be traced consistently, at least, from the XVIII century.

[1] Brade, I. & Kovacs, Z. (2014). City and countryside under world-wide urbanization. Regional Research of Russia 4(2), 76–80. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970514020038.

[2] Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

[3] Dewey, R. (1960). The rural-urban continuum: Real but relatively unimportant. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 60–66. DOI: 10.1086/222824.

[4] Farrell, T. (2014). The city as a tangled bank. Urban design vs urban evolution. Hoboken: Wiley.

[5] Gol'denberg, P., Gol'denberg, B. (1935). Planirovka zhilogo kvartala Moskvy XVII, XVIII i XIX vv. (Planning residential quarter of Moscow XVII, XVIII and XIX centuries). Moskva/Leningrad: Glavnaja redakcija stroitel'noj literatury.

[6] Howard, E. (1902). Garden cities of tomorrow. London: S. Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd.

[7] Keough, N. (2005). The sustainable Calgary story: A local response to a global challenge. In Phillips, R., ed., Community indicators measuring systems (pp. 65–95). Aldershot: Ashgate.

[8] Knox, P. (2005). Creating ordinary places: Slow cities in a fast world. Journal of Urban Design 10(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/13574800500062221.

[9] Mayer, H. & Knox, P. (2009). Pace of life and quality of life: the Slow City Charter. In Sirgy, M. J., Phillips, R. & Rahtz, D. R., eds., Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases III (pp. 21–40). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2257-8_2.

[10] Niström, L. (1995). The diversity of the urban environment – a result of planning or of laissez-faire? Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 12(4), 223–229. DOI: 10.1080/02815739508730391.

[11] Redfield, R. (1930). Tepoztlán, a mexican village: A study of folk life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

[12] Ritzer, G. (2004). The McDonaldization of society. Thousand Oaks: Pine Science Press.

[13] Savchenko, A., ed. (2013). Moskva. Preemstvennost' v peremenah. 400 let gradostroitel'nyh planov Moskvy. Moscow: Genplan Institute of Moscow.

[14] Sorokin, P. & Zimmerman, C. (1929). Principles of rural-urban sociology. New York: Holt.

[15] Sudjic, D. (1993). The 100 Mile City, London: Harcourt.

[16] Treivish, A. I. (2016). The rural-urban continuum: regional dimensions. In Kotlyakov, V. M., Streleckij, V. N., Glezer, O. B. & Safronov, S. G., eds., Problemy regional'nogo razvitija Rossii (pp. 51–71). Moscow: Russian Geographical Society.

[17] Ul'janova, G. (2012). Dvorcy, usad'by, dohodnye doma. Istoricheskie rasskazy o nedvizhimosti Moskvy i Podmoskov'ja. Moskva: Forum; Neolit.

[18] Cittaslow (2017). Cittaslow, Vereinigung der lebenswerten Stadte in Deutschland. Retrieved January 15, 2017, from

[19] Posjolok Sokol. Istorija posjolka i ego zhitelej (Sokol Village. The history of the village and its inhabitants) (2004). Moscow: Olma-Press.

[20] Slow cities (2017). Retrieved January 15, 2017, from

[21] World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.607


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 162 162 22
PDF Downloads 68 68 7