Methods for the Assessment of Rural Social Infrastructure Needs

Gintarė Vaznonienė 1  and Rasa Pakeltienė 1
  • 1 Business and Rural Development Management Institute, Faculty of Economics and Management, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 53361, Kaunas, Lithuania


This article reveals the importance of different methods for assessment of social infrastructure (SI) development needs in rural areas. Rural social infrastructure is a significant element of rural territories interpreted in different ways: as social and economic system, basic services for local community, social bridge for integrating different social groups into the society, important factor for satisfaction of rural people’s needs and acknowledgement of their human rights. Besides the mentioned importance of SI to rural areas and rural community, the lack of exploration of methods for analysis of the needs for developing rural social infrastructure has been noticed in the scientific literature. The research aim is therefore to analyse the methods for assessment of needs of rural social infrastructure. The research question has been set accordingly: how different methods for need analysis could be applied to social infrastructure planning and development? The research results show that need analysis is generally linked to various methods, but for the SI planning, development and implementation specifically, there are certain methods, the application of which depends on specifics of rural areas (as territory) and features of local community.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Ahgren, B., Axelsson, S. B., & Axelsson, R. (2009). Evaluating intersectoral collaboration: a model for assessment by service users. International Journal of Integrated Care 9(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.304.

  • [2] Atkočiūnienė, V. (2000). Lietuvos kaimo socialinė infrastruktūra; ekonominis vertinimas ir plėtra [PhD. Theses]. Kaunas: Aleksandras Strulginskis University.

  • [3] Atkočiūnienė, V., Aleksandravičius, A., Kiaušienė, I., Vaznonienė, G., Pakeltienė, R. & Lukė, R. (2014). Kaimo socialinės infrastruktūros vystymasis siekiant užtikrinti teritorinę ir socialinę sanglaudą: mokslo studija Kaunas: Aleksandro Stulginskio universitetas.

  • [4] Bivainis, J. & Vilkaitė, N. (2010). Vartotojų lojalumo nustatymo metodinio potencialo analizė. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, nr. 11(1), 49–60.

  • [5] Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachement as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(3), 497–529. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.

  • [6] Engle, M., & Altschuld, J. W. (2014). Needs assessment: The perspective from the public sector. In J. W. Altschuld & R. Watkins (Eds.), Needs assessment: Trends and a view toward the future. New Directions for Evaluation (pp. 33–45). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • [7] Israel, B. (1985). Social Networks and Social Support: Implications for Natural Helper and Community Level Interventions. Health Education Quarterly, 12(1), 65–80. DOI: 10.1177/109019818501200106.

  • [8] Gabdrakhmanov, N. K. & Rubtsov, V. A. (2014). The Objects of Social Infrastructure in the Social Image of the Region Shaping. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences. 140, 419–421. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.446.

  • [9] Kondrotaitė, G. (2012). Evaluation of the quality of public services in Lithuanian municipalities. Intellectual Economics 6, (3), 393–411.

  • [10] Kulbickienė, L. (2004). Lietuvos gyventojų kultūriniai poreikiai: kultūros įstaigų vertinimas ir lankymas. Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas 8(2), 64–71.

  • [11] Lewin, K. (1946). Action-research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 2(4), 34–46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.

  • [12] Marcinkevičiūtė, L. & Petrauskienė, R. (2007). Socialinių paslaugų teikimo tobulinimo aktualijos kaimiškose seniūnijose. Viešoji politika ir administravimas. 27, 28–37.

  • [13] Rappaport, J. (1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In Tolan, P., Keys, C., Chertok, F. & Jason, L., eds, Researching Community Psychology (pp. 51–63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/10073-005.

  • [14] Teriman, S., Yigitcanlar, T. & Mayere, S. (2011). Social infrastructure planning and sustainable community: example from south east Queensland, Australia. In: Jahan, N., ed., Proceedings of the Business and Social Science Research Conference 2011 (pp. 1–12). Melbourne: World Business Institute Australia.

  • [15] Vaznonienė, G. (2015). The role of rural community enhancing rural social infrastructure changes. Research for Rural Development. International Scientific Conference Proceedings (Latvia) 2, 176–182.

  • [16] Yessengeldina, A., Sitenko, D. & Seitalinova, A. (2014). The Development of Social Infrastructure in Kazakhstan. Public Policy and Administration. 13(2), 222–231. DOI: 10.13165/VPA-14-13-2-03.

  • [17] Zikienė, K. (2009). Vartotojų lojalumas: pakeitimo elgsenos formavimo modelis. Vadybos mokslas ir studijos – kaimo verslų ir jų infrastruktūros plėtrai, 18(3), 89–97.

  • [18] Wang, C. & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, Methodology and use for participatory needs assessment. Health education and behavior 24(3), 369–387. DOI: 10.1177/109019819702400309.

  • [19] Weber, B., Alfen, H. W. & Staub-Bisang, M. (2016). Infrastructure as an Asset Class–Investment Strategy, Sustainability, Project finance and PPP. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • [20] A Guide for Comprehensive Needs Assessment (2008). Albuquerque: Southwest Comprehensive Center at WestEd. Available at (online access 2017 01 18):

  • [21] Demographic Yearbook 2015. (2016). Vilnius: Statistics Lithuania.

  • [22] DFID (2013). Connecting People, Creating Wealth: Infrastructure for economic development and poverty reduction. London: DFID.

  • [23] DFID (2015). Sustainable infrastructure for shared prosperity and poverty reduction: A policy framework. London: DFID. Available at (online access 2017 01 16):

  • [24] Infrastructure Analysis to inform the Bay of Plenty Regional Spatial Plan (2014). Final Draft (Revised). Available at (online access 2017 01 19):

  • [25] Planning For Social Infrastructure And Community Services For Urban Growth Areas (2012). Online access (2017 01 15):

  • [26] Socialinės apsaugos ir darbo ministerija. Socialinis pranešimas – 2004, Vilnius: Puntukas, 2004.

  • [27] Social infrastructure planning (2007). Implementation Guideline No. 5. South East Queensland Regional Plan 2005–2026. Online access (2017 01 10):

  • [28] Statistical yearbook of Lithuania 2015. (2016). Vilnius: Statistics Lithuania.

  • [29] Titcomb, L. A. (2000). Need Analysis. ICYF Evaluation Concept Sheet. Tucson: The University of Arizona. Available at (online access 2017 01 10):

  • [30] Watanabe, Y. P (2007). Program evaluation: Utilizing needs analysis for decision making. TESOL Convetion. Available at (online access 2017 01 19):


Journal + Issues