Economic and Social Impacts of Promoting Cultural Heritage Protection by the Czech Rural Development Programme 2007–2013

Jana Kouřilová 1  and Martin Pělucha 1
  • 1 Department of Regional Studies, Faculty of Economics, University of Economics, 130 67, Prague, Czechia


Cultural heritage can play a very important role in local and regional development with economic and social effects. The European Union (EU) outlined a specific measure that is aimed at the protection and development of rural heritage within rural development policy in the programming period of 2007–2013. The main aim of this paper is to assess economic and social impacts of projects supported by EU Rural Policy in the Czech Republic during the period of 2007–2013. The implemented projects were located mainly in peripheral rural areas, both near to borders and in inner peripheries, which means that the measure was geographically well targeted. The results of the measure contribute to the restoration and reconstruction of historical monuments, churches, cemeteries and small sacral monuments which create an environment in rural settlements. This environment is very important for the community life and strengthening local identity. In the field of economic development, the results of this measure demonstrate only limited effects in supported villages.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Alumäe, H., Prinstmann, A. & Palang, H. (2003). Cultural and Historical Values in Landscape Planning: Locals’ Perception. In Palang, H., Fry, G., eds., Landscape Interfaces Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes (pp. 125–145). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • [2] Antošová, G. (2016). Cultural rural development in the Czech Republic (Case study of the Liberec region). European Countryside 8(3), 263–277. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0019.

  • [3] Asztalos Morell, I. (2014). “I do not understand how I became a farmer”: The small-peasant path to family farm enterprise in post-socialist rural Hungary. Development Studies Research 1(1), 88–99, DOI: 10.1080/21665095.2014.916188.

  • [4] Bell, D. & Jayne, M. (2010). The creative countryside: Policy a practice in the UK rural cultural economy. Journal of Rural Studies 26, 209–218. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.01.001.

  • [5] Bičík, I. & Jančák, V. (2005). Transformační procesy v českém zemědělství po roce 1990. Praha: Charles University.

  • [6] Chaplin, H., Gorton, M. & Davidova, S. (2007). Impediments to the Diversification of Rural Economies in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from Small-scale Farms in Poland, Regional Studies 41(3), DOI: 10.1080/00343400701282129.

  • [7] Chromý, P., Jančák, V., Marada, M. & Havlíček, T. (2011). Venkov – žitý prostor: regionální diferenciace percepce venkova představiteli venkovských obcí v Česku. Geografie 116(1), 23–45.

  • [8] Chromý, P. & Janů, H. (2003). Regional identity, activation of territorial communities and the potential odf the development of peripheral regions. Acta Universitatis CarolinaeGeographica 38(1), 105–117.

  • [9] Courtney, P., Hill, G. & Roberts, D. (2006). The role of natural heritage in rural development: An analysis of economic linkages in Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies 22(4), 469–484. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.003.

  • [10] Crouch, D. (2006). Tourism, consumption and rurality. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P., eds., The Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 355–363). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • [11] Čapkovičová, A. (2016). Transformation of the employment base in Czech rural regions, Regional Studies, Regional Science 3(1), 229–238. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2016.1165626.

  • [12] Daugstad, K., Rønningen, K. & Skar, B. (2006). Agriculture as an upholder of cultural heritage? Conceptualizations and value judgements – A Norwegian perspective in international context. Journal of Rural Studies 22(1), 67–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.06.002.

  • [13] Dolista, J. (2006). Religiozita v českém prostředí a v pohraničí. In: Majerová, V., ed., Venkov je náš svět (pp. 304–306). Praha: Česká zemědělská univerzita.

  • [14] Ducros, H. (2014). Protect, Promote, Develop: Rural Tourism and Village Patrimonialisation in France. In Dashper, K., ed., Rural Tourism: An International Perspective (pp. 59–78). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  • [15] Hinterstoisser, H. (2001). The rural heritage as a main factor for development – The multifunctionality of landscapes in rural areas in Austria. Naturopa 95, 10–11.

  • [16] Heřmanová, E., Chromý, P. et al. (2009). Kulturní regiony a geografie kultury. Praha: ASPI.

  • [17] Ilbery, B. et al. (1998). The Geography of Rural Change. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

  • [18] Jablonská, L. (2005). Udržitelná minulost? Aneb sídelní ráz versus regulace. In Venkov, jeho proměny a územní plánování (pp. 50–56). Brno: Ústav územního rozvoje.

  • [19] Johnson, M. T. (2013). Evaluating Culture: Well-Being, Institutions and Circumstance. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137313799.

  • [20] Keitsch, M. M., Kua, H. W. & Skjerven, A. (2016). Special Issue: The Cultural Dimension of Resilience and Sustainability. Sustainable Development 24, 273–274. DOI: 10.1002/sd.1627.

  • [21] Kloosterman, R. C. (2014). Cultural Amenities: Large and Small, Mainstream and Niche – A Conceptual Framework for Cultural Planning in an Age of Austerity. European Planning Studies 22(12), 2510–2525. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.790594.

  • [22] Labadi, S. (2013). UNESCO, Cultural Heritage, and Outstanding Universal Values. Value-based Analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Conventions. Plymouth: AltaMira Press.

  • [23] Lapuh, L. & Šmid Hribar, M. (2014). Cultural heritage: the driver of development. In Nared, J. & Razpotnik Viskovic, N., eds., Managing Cultural Heritage Sites in Southeastern Europe (pp. 19–22). Ljubljana: Geografski inšitut Anatona Malika ZRC SAZU.

  • [24] Lee, J., Árnason, A., Nightingale, A. & Shucksmith, M. (2005). Networking: Social Capital and Identities in European Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis 45(4), 267–283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00305.x.

  • [25] Lempert, D. (2015). Classifying heritage by states of decay, restoration, and transformation for tourism, teaching, and research: ‘un-freezing’ sites in time to reveal additional meanings. Journal of Heritage Tourism 10(4), 378–398. DOI: 10.1080/1743873X.2014.994637.

  • [26] Lysgård, H., K. (2016). The ‘actually existing’ cultural policy and culture-led strategies of rural places and small towns. Journal of Rural Studies 44, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.014.

  • [27] MacDonald, R. & Jolliffe, L. (2003). Cultural rural tourism. Evidence from Canada. Annals of Tourism Research 30(2), 307–322. DOI: 10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00061-0.

  • [28] Majerová, V. (2007). Social factors influencing the differences between developed and less developed regions. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 53(11), 513–517.

  • [29] Majerová, V., Pavlíková, G. & Maříková, P. (2010). Current social structure of agricultural workers in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 56(11), 508–521.

  • [30] Marková, B. & Tichá, I. (2011). The Impact of Globalization on Cultural Policy: A Case Study of the City of Ostrava. In Mácha, P. & Drobík, T., eds., The Scale of Globalization. Think Globally, Act Locally, Change Individually in the 21st Century (pp. 207–212). Ostrava: University of Ostrava.

  • [31] Mettepenningen, E., Vandermeulen, V., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Nick Schuermans, N., Van Hecke, E., Messely, L., Dessein, J. & Bourgeois, M. (2012). Exploring Synergies between Place Branding and Agricultural Landscape Management as a Rural Development Practice. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(4), 432–452. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00575.x.

  • [32] Nikischer, R. (2013). Teritoriálna identita obyvateľov Česka a Slovenska, Geografie 118(3), 243–264.

  • [33] Patočka, J. & Heřmanová, E. (2008). Lokální a regionální kultura v České republice. Praha: ASPI.

  • [34] Pělucha, M. et al. (2012). Venkov na prahu 21. století. Praha: Alfa.

  • [35] Pek, T. (2009). Stavební památkySpecifika přípravy a financování jejich obnovy, údržby a provozu. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.

  • [36] Pospěch, P. (2014). Discursive no man’s land: Analysing the discourse of the rural in the transitional Czech Republic. Journal of Rural Studies 34, 96–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.006.

  • [37] Ray, C. (1998). Culture, Intellectual Property and Territorial Rural Development, Sociologia Ruralis 38(1), 3–20. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00060.

  • [38] Rampton, J., Carlberg, M. et al. (2015). Mid-term evaluation of the sector cultural heritage under the EEA grants, 20092014. [A final report]. Oxford: Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services.

  • [39] Sarris, A. H, Doucha, T. & Mathijs, E. (1999). Agricultural restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: implications for competitiveness and rural development. European Review of Agricultural Economics 26(3), 305–329. DOI: 10.1093/erae/26.3.305.

  • [40] Shipley, R. & Feick, R. (2009). A Practical Approach for Evaluating Cultural Heritage Landscapes: Lessons From Rural Ontario, Planning Practice & Research 24(4), 455–469. DOI: 10.1080/02697450903327113.

  • [41] Sklenička, P. (2006). Applying evaluation criteria for the land consolidation effect to three contrasting study areas in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy 23()4, 502–510. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.03.001.

  • [42] Sokol, M. (2001). Central and Eastern Europe a Decade After the Fall of State-socialism: Regional Dimensions of Transition Processes. Regional Studies, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 645–655. DOI: 10.1080/00343400120075911.

  • [43] Spousta, J. (2002). Changes in Religious Values in the Czech Republic. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 345–363.

  • [44] Stenseke, M. (2000). Whose landscape values? Central goals versus local perspectives in planning and management of the rural landscape. In Haartsen, T., Groote, P. & Huigen, P.P.P., eds., Claiming Rural Identities. Dynamics, Contexts, Policies. Assen: Van Gorcum.

  • [45] Šifta, M. & Chromý, P. (2014). Symboly a identita regionu: Analýza vnímání přírodních symbolů oblastí s intenzivně přeměněnou krajinou v Česku. Geografický časopis 66(4), 401–415.

  • [46] Šmid Hribar, M., Bole, D. & Pipa, P. (2015). Sustainable heritage management: social, economic and other potentials of culture in local development. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 188, pp. 103–110, DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.344.

  • [47] Šmid Hribar, M. & Lozej, Š. L. (2013). The role of identifying and managing cultural values in rural development. Acta geogaphica Slovenica 53(2), 371–378.

  • [48] Vaishar, A. & Zapletalová, J. (2016). Regional identities of Czech historical lands. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 65(1), 15–25. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.65.1.2.

  • [49] Věžník. A. & Bartošová, L. (2004). Selected regional differences of the Czech Republic agriculture after the transformation processes. Agricultural Economics 50(5), 207–216.

  • [50] Wang, Y. (2016). A Sustainable Approach for Post-Disaster Rehabilitation of Rural Heritage Settlements. Sustainable Development 24(5), 319–329. DOI: 10.1002/sd.1632.

  • [51] Woods, M. (2011). Rural. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

  • [52] Wokoun, R., Kourilova, J., Pelucha, M. & Kveton, V. (2010). Prospective Future Trends in Urban – Rural Relationships within the Territorial Agenda of the EU: A Critical Analysis of Implementation with a Special Focus on the Example of the Czech Republic. European Planning Studies 18(11), 1881–1896. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2010.512172.

  • [53] Wokoun, R. et al (2011). Základy regionálních věd a veřejné správy. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk.

  • [54] Zeman, K. (2013). Vývoj vlastnictví k půdě a souvisejících procesů na území ČR od roku 1918 do současné doby. Praha: Oeconomica.

  • [55] European Council (2005). Council Regulation (EC) no. 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on supporting the development of rural areas by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). Retrieved from: [accessed by 2017-01-10].

  • [56] European Council (2007). Resolution of the Council of 16 November 2007 on a European Agenda for Culture. 2007/C 287/01. Retrieved from: [accessed by 2017-01-15].

  • [57] European Comission (2014). Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2014) 477. Retrieved from: [accessed by 2017-01-10].

  • [58] ESPON (2013). EDORA (European Development Opportunities for Rural Areas). Applied Research Project 2013/1/2. Retrieved from: [accessed by 2017-01-15].

  • [59] European Network for Rural development (2014). Rural Development Programme 20072013 of Austria. State of the Total Public and EAFRD expenditure per measure. Retrieved from: [accessed by 2017-01-15].

  • [60] Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Hungary (2007). New Hungary Rural Deveploment Programme. Retrieved from: [accessed by 2017-01-15].

  • [61] Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Poland (2007). Rural Development Programme for 20072013. Retrieved from: [accessed by 2017-01-15].

  • [62] Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Slovak Republic (2007). Rural Development Programme of the Slovak Republic 2007–2013. Retrieved from:,%20Chapter%203%202%20-%20Strategy%20chosen [accessed by 2017-01-15].

  • [63] PRISMA (2009). Rural cultural heritage in Europe: From past to present. A Synthesis Report of Research. Compiled and edited by PRISMA, Athens 2009. Retrieved from:

  • [64] MMR ČR (2014). Integrovaný regionální operační program 20142020. Retrieved from: [accessed by 2017-01-19].

  • [65] Ministry of Agricuture (MoA)/State Agricultural Intervention Fund (SAIF) (2016): data about implementation of Measure III.2.2 of the Rural Development Programme of the Czech Republic 2007–2013.

  • [66] OECD (2005). Culture and Local Development. Paris: OECD Publications.

  • [67] OECD (2014). Innovation and Modernising the Rural Economy. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264205390-en.


Journal + Issues