The Role of Small Towns in a Potential Ecoregion through the Example of Fertő/Neusiedlersee Cultural Landscape

Open access

Abstract

Fertő/Neusiedlersee Cultural Landscape, as a transboundary World Heritage Site of Hungary and Austria, possesses unique cultural and natural values. The examined areas can be characterised as meeting places of different cultures. We examined the role of small towns in Fertő/Neusiedlersee Cultural Landscape, which play an important role in regional development. In the last 25 years, different levels of cooperation started among the Hungarian and Austrian settlements aiming at nature and cultural heritage protection and tourism development. We formulated suggestions to maintain and strengthen the existing co-operation and relations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] 321/2012. (XI. 16.) Korm. rendelet a területszervezési eljárásról.

  • [2] 1971 Országos Területfejlesztési Koncepció (1971 National Spatial Development Concept).

  • [3] Beluszky P. & Tímár L. (2003). Magyarország történeti földrajza. Budapest-Pécs: Dialóg Campus Kiadó.

  • [4] Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz: http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000138 (Retrieved: 1 April 2016).

  • [5] Busch J. (2008). Gains from configuration: The transboundary protected area as a conservation tool. Ecological Economics 67(3) 394-404. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.012.

  • [6] Czerny M. van Lindert P. & Verkoren O. (1997). Small and intermediate towns in Latin American rural and regional Development (pp. 1-14). In Lindert van P. & Verkoren O. eds. Small Towns and Beyond: Rural Transformation and Small Urban Centres in Latin America Amsterdam: Thela Publishers.

  • [7] Eriksson G. A. (1979). Tourism at the Finnish–Swedish–Norwegian borders (pp. 151-162). In Gruber G. Lamping H. Lutz W. Matznetter J. & Vorlaufer K. eds. Tourism and Borders: Proceedings of the Meeting of the IGU Working Group – Geography of Tourism and Recreation Institut für Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeographie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.

  • [8] Európa Tanács/European council (2000): Európai Táj Egyezmény. (2007. évi CXI. törvény a Firenzében 2000. október 20-án kelt az Európai Táj Egyezmény kihirdetéséről).

  • [9] Fertő-táj Kultúrtáj világörökségi kezelési terve Stadtland–AVL-Bécs VÁTI KHT–Budapest 2003.

  • [10] Gehl J. (2010). Cities for people. Washington-Covelo-London: ISLANDPRESS.

  • [11] Gemeindestatus: http://www.burgenland.at/land-politik-verwaltung/land/bezirke-gemeinden/ (Retrieved: 1 April 2016).

  • [12] Hamza C. Frangenheim A. Charles D. & Miller P. (2014). The role of cities in cohesion policy 2014-2020. Brussel: European Parliament. Doi: 10.2861/6801.

  • [13] Közép- és Kelet-Európa. Rejtett potenciál a kis- és középvárosokban. European Union az ESPON 2013 Program keretében futó ESPON on the road projekt magyar kiadás. http://esponontheroad.eu.

  • [14] McCallum W. J. Vasilijevic M. & Cuthill I. (2015). Assessing the benefits of Transboundary Protected Areas: A questionnaire survey in the Americas and the Caribbean. Journal of Environmental Management 149 245-252. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.013.

  • [15] McMahon G. Gregonis S. M. Waltman S. W. Omernik J. M. Thorson T. D. Freeouf J. A. Rorick A. H. & Keys J. E. (2001). Developing a Spatial Framework of Common Ecological Regions for the Conterminous United States. Environmental Management 28(3) 293-316. DOI: 10.1007/s002670010225.

  • [16] Milenković M. (2012). Ecoregionalism - Factor Cross-Border Cooperation and Tourism Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 44 236-240. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.025.

  • [17] Omernik J. M. (2004). Perspectives on the Nature and Definition of Ecological Regions. Environmental Management 34(Suppl. 1) S27-S38. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-5197-2.

  • [18] Opermanis O. MacSharry B. Evans D. & Sipkova Z. (2013). Is the connectivity of the Natura 2000 network better across internal or external administrative borders? Biological Conservation 166 170-174. Doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.019.

  • [19] Owusu G. (2005). The role of district capitals in regional development: linking small towns rural-urban linkages and decentralisation in Ghana. [PhD theses]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

  • [20] Pedersen A. (2002). Managing Tourism at World Heritage Sites: a Practical Manual for World Heritage Site Managers. Paris UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

  • [21] Strategie Raumstruktur Landesentwicklungsplan Burgenland (2011). [Endbericht]. Mecca consulting and Regional Consulting ZT GmbH.

  • [22] Territorial Agenda of the European Union. Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed on the occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion. Leipzig 24/25 May 2007.

  • [23] Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 (2011). Towards an Inclusive Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19 May 2011. Gödöllő Hungary.

  • [24] Trillo-Santamaría J. M. & Paül V. (2016). Transboundary protected areas as ideal tools? Analyzing the Gerês-Xurés transboundary biosphere reserve. Land Use Policy 52 454-463. Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.019.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.651

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 201 129 5
PDF Downloads 128 106 7