Regional Development and Climate Change Adaptation: A Study of the Role of Legitimacy

  • 1 Work Research Institute, Centre for Welfare and Labour Research, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, PO box 4, St. Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo
  • 2 Laboratory for Risk Research & Management, FBI - Faculty of Safety Engineering, VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava, Lumírova 13, Ostrava

Abstract

This paper presents results from a study of Czech Local Action Groups (LAGs), focusing on gaining knowledge about their internally perceived legitimacy and their potential role in local adaptation to climate change. Former studies on the role of governance networks in climate change adaptation have suggested that these networks’ legitimacy are crucial for their success. In this article we provide an analytical framework that can be used to address different aspects of local governance networks which are important for their legitimacy and the way they are apt as instruments for climate change adaptation actions. We also present a survey among LAG members that provide empirical data that we discuss in the article. The framework and the data are discussed with reference to existing contributions in the intersection of legitimacy, governance networks and climate change adaptation. A specific aim is to provide research based recommendations for further improving LAGs as an adaptation instrument. In addition, knowledge is generated that will be interesting for further studies of similar local governance initiatives in the climate change adaptation context.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74-102. DOI: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [2] Beck, U. (2006). Reflexive governance: politics in the global risk society. In Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D. & Kemp, R. (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 31-56). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

  • [3] Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2010). Governing climate change. London ; New York: Routledge.

  • [4] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J., & Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007-2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 56-68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [5] Deephouse, D. L. & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism (pp. 49-77). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 49.

  • [6] Delin, M. (2012). The role of farmers in Local Action Groups: The case of the national network of the Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 58(9), 433-442.

  • [7] Dingwerth, K. (2007). The New Transnationalism: Private Transnational Governance and its Democratic Legitimacy. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • [8] Dostál, J. (2012). Cooperation between non-governmental organizations and the State in the matter of flood risk management in the Czech Republic. In Proverbs, D. G. ed., Flood recovery, innovation and response III (pp. 15-26). Southampton: WIT Press. DOI: 10.2495/FRIAR120021.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [9] Dwyer, J. & Findeis, J. (2008). Human and Social Capital in Rural Development – EU and US Perspectives Human- und Sozialkapital in der Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums – Perspektiven aus der EU und den USA Le capital social et humain dans le développement rural: Perspectives aux États-Unis et dans l’Union européenne. EuroChoices, 7(1), 38-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2008.00084.x.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [10] ECONADPT. (2015). The Costs and Benefits of Adaptation: Results from the ECONADAPT Project. The ECONADAPT consortium. Retrieved from http://econadapt.eu/docs/Econadapt-policy-report-on-costs-and-benefits-of-adaptaiton-july-draft-2015.pdf.

  • [11] Ensor, J. & Berger, R. (2009). Community Based Adaptation and Culture in Theory and Practice. In Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I. & O’Brien, K. L. (Eds.), Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance (pp. 227-239). Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • [12] European Commission. (2006). The Leader approach: a basic guide. Luxembourg: EUR-OP. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/fact/leader/2006_en.pdf.

  • [13] European Commission. (2010). Eurobarometer. 1. Life in the European Union (Standard Eurobarometer No. 70) (p. 209). European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb70/eb70_part1_en.pdf.

  • [14] European Commission. (2013). An EU Strategy on adaptation to climate change. (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions No. COM (2013) 216 final). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0216&from=EN.

  • [15] European Court of Auditors. (2010). Implementation of the Leader approach for rural development: (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  • [16] Forsberg, E.-M. (2012a). Applying instruments for regional innovation – generating projects or legitimacy? International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 4(5), 430-445. DOI: 10.1504/IJIRD.2012.048995.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [17] Forsberg, E.-M. (2012b). Standardisation in the Field of Nanotechnology: Some Issues of Legitimacy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 719-739. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9268-0.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [18] Glaas, E., Jonsson, A., Hjerpe, M. & Andersson-Sköld, Y. (2010). Managing climate change vulnerabilities: formal institutions and knowledge use as determinants of adaptive capacity at the local level in Sweden. Local Environment, 15(6), 525-539. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2010.487525.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [19] Hudečková, H. & Lošťák, M. (2008). LEADER in the Czech Republic and farming sector. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 54(12), 555-565.

  • [20] IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • [21] Katona-Kovács, J., High, C. & Nemes, G. (2011). Importance of Animation Actions in the Operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups. European Countryside, 3(4), 227-240. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0006-7.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [22] Kumar, R. & Das, T. K. (2007). Interpartner Legitimacy in the Alliance Development Process*. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1425-1453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00709.x.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [23] Lederer, M. (2011). From CDM to REDD+ – What do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance? Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1900-1907. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.003.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [24] Lošťák, M. & Hudečková, H. (2010). Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 56, 249-265.

  • [25] Low, B. & Johnston, W. J. (2010). Organizational network legitimacy and its impact on knowledge networks: the case of China’s TD-SCDMA mobility technology. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(6), 468-477. DOI: 10.1108/08858621011066053.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [26] Majule, A. E., Stathers, T., Lamboll, R., Liwenga, E. T., Ngongondo, C., Kalanda-Joshua, M., Swai, E. & Chipungu, F. (2013). Enhancing capacities of individuals, institutions and organizations to adapt to climate change in agricultural sector using innovation system approaches in Tanzania and Malawi. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(6), 220-231.

  • [27] Maurel, M.-C. (2008). Local Development Stakeholders and the European Model: Learning the LEADER Approach in the New Member States. Czech Sociological Review, 44(3), 511-530.

  • [28] Moser, S. C. & Ekstrom, J. A. (2010). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(51), 22026-22031. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007887107.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [29] National Network of Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic. (2011, May). NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN. LEADER 2014+. Retrieved from http://nsmascr.cz/content/uploads/2012/07/NATIONAL-STRATEGIC-PLAN-LEADER-2014+-SUMMARY.pdf.

  • [30] OECD. (2014). Society at a Glance 2014. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/society-at-a-glance-2014_soc_glance-2014-en.

  • [31] OECD. (2015). Climate Change Risks and Adaptation. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/climate-change-risks-and-adaptation_9789264234611-en.

  • [32] Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

  • [33] Pechrová, M. & Boukalová, K. (2015). Differences Among Czech Local Action Groups In Using Selected Principles Of Leader*. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 46(1), 41-48. DOI: 10.1515/sab-2015-0015.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [34] Persson, S. G., Lundberg, H. & Andresen, E. (2011). Interpartner legitimacy in regional strategic networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 1024-1031. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.027.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [35] Ray, C. (1999). Endogenous Development in the Era of Reflexive Modernity. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(3), 257-267. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [36] Ray, C. (2000). Editorial. The EU leader Programme: Rural Development Laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 163-171. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00138.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [37] Scott, M. (2013). Resilience: a Conceptual Lens for Rural Studies? Geography Compass, 7(9), 597-610. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12066.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [38] Sørensen, E. (2002). Democratic Theory and Network Governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(4), 693-720. DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2002.11029383.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [39] Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [40] Thuesen, A. A. (2010). Partnership Organising of Rural and Coastal Development in Denmark (Ph.d.). Syddansk Universitet. Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakulter. Retrieved from http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/A/F/A/%7BAFA43E21-7DCF-4BFC-A1C6-8DA4E1FDD6B8%7DSamlet%20LAG%20afhandling.pdf.

  • [41] Thuesen, A. A. (2011). Partnerships as Associations: Input and Output Legitimacy of LEADER Partnerships in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 575-594. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548469.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [42] Thuesen, A. A. (2016). The Democratic Capabilities of and Rhetoric on LEADER LAGs in the EU – The Danish Case. In Granberg, L., Andersson, K. & Kovách, I., eds., Evaluating the European Approach to Rural Development: Grass-roots Experiences of the LEADER Programme (pp. 79-93). Routledge.

  • [43] Thuessen, A. A. & Nielsen, N. C. (2014). A Territorial Perspective On EU’s Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings. European Countryside, 6(4). DOI: 10.2478/euco-2014-0017.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [44] Urwin, K. & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 180-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [45] Van Aalst, M. K., Cannon, T. & Burton, I. (2008). Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 165-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.002.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [46] Varga, E. (2009). Non-profit organizations in Hungarian rural development – a leader+ example in the southern Transdanubian region. European Countryside, 1(2), 93-103. DOI: 10.2478/v10091/009-0008-2.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [47] Ward, P. N., Atterton, D. J., Kim, T., Lowe, P. P., Phillipson, J. & Thompson, D. N. (2005). Universities, the Knowledge Economy and “Neo-Endogenous Rural Development”. Retrieved from http://eprint.ncl.ac.uk/pub_details2.aspx?pub_id=148470.

  • [48] Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (1. pbk. ed., reprint). New York, NY: Free Press.

  • [49] Weichselgartner, J. & Pigeon, P. (2015). The Role of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 107-116. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-015-0052-7.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [50] Winsvold, M., Stokke, K. B., Klausen, J. E. & Saglie, I. L. (2009). Organizational learning and governance in adaptation in urban development (pp. 476-490). In Adger, N., Lorenzoni, I. & O’Brien, K., eds., Adapting to climate change. Thresholds, values, governance.

  • [51] Wynne, B. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide. In Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. & Wynne, B. (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology (pp. 44-84). London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search