Images Of A Good Village: A Visual Analysis Of The Rural Idyll In The “Village Of The Year” Competition In The Czech Republic

Open access


This paper presents a sociological analysis of the image of a “good village”, as portrayed in the annual Czech competition Village of the Year. It focuses on the positive representations attached to the rural in the political and expert discourse. The analysis is rooted in cultural rural sociology and in its study of rural idyll. It is argued that a specific kind of rural idyll is produced in the competition. This idyll is analysed using the photographs submitted to the competition by the villages themselves. A combination of visual methods is employed to uncover the positive values attached to the images. The results show that activity and social life play a key role in the image of a “good village” thus produced. On the other hand, there are virtually no references to agriculture.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Alexander J. (2003). The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • [2] Baylina M. & Berg N. (2010). Selling the countryside: Representations of rurality in Norway and Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies 17(3) 277-292. Doi: 10.1177/0969776409356215.

  • [3] Binek J. (2009). Synergie ve venkovském prostoru: aktéři a nástroje rozvoje venkova. Brno: GaREP.

  • [4] Blažek B. (1998). Venkov města média. Praha: Slon.

  • [5] Bell D. (1997). Anti-idyll: rural horror (pp. 91-104). In: Cloke P. & Little J. eds. Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness Marginalisation and Rurality. London: Routledge.

  • [6] Bell D. (2006). Variations on the rural idyll (pp. 149-161). In: Cloke P. Marsden T. Mooney P. H. eds. Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage London.

  • [7] Bell M. (2007). The two-ness of rural life and the ends of rural scholarship. Journal of Rural Studies 23 402-415. Doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.03.003.

  • [8] Brandth B. (1995). Rural masculinity in transition: Gender images in tractor advertisements. Journal of Rural Studies 11(2) 123-133. Doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(95)00007-A.

  • [9] Chaplin E. (1994). Sociology and Visual Representation. London New York: Routledge.

  • [10] Cloke P. (1997). Country Backwater to Virtual Village? Rural Studies and ′The cultural turn′. Journal of Rural Studies 13(4) 367-375. Doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00053-3.

  • [11] Cloke P. (2006). Conceptualizing Rurality. In Cloke Paul J. Mardsen T. & Mooney P. (eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies (Pp. 18-28). Thousand Oaks Calif.: SAGE.

  • [12] Cloke P. & Little J. (Eds.) (1997). Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness Marginalisation and Rurality. London: Routledge.

  • [13] Collier J. & Collier M. (1990). Visual anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

  • [14] CZSO (2014). Náboženská víra obyvatel podle výsledků sčítání lidu. Prague: Czech Statistical Office. Available at$File/17022014.pdf.

  • [15] Duenckmann F. (2010). The village in the mind: Applying Q-methodology to reconstructing constructions of rurality. Journal of Rural Studies 26 284-295. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.01.003.

  • [16] Erjavec K. Erjavec E. & Juvančič L. (2009). New wine in old bottles: critical discourse analysis of the current common EU agricultural policy reform agenda. Sociologia Ruralis 49(1) 41-55. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00477.x.

  • [17] Figueiredo E. & Raschi A. (2011). “Un’ immensa campagna avvolta dal verde” - Reinventing rural areas in Italy through tourism promotional images. European countryside 3(1) 1-20. Doi: 10.2478/v10091-011-0001-4.

  • [18] Halfacree K. (1993). Locality and social representation: space discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies 9 (1) 23-37. Doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(93)90003-3.

  • [19] Halfacree K. H. (1995). Talking about rurality: social representations of the rural as expressed by residents of six English parishes. Journal of Rural Studies 11 (1) 1-20. Doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(94)00039-C.

  • [20] Hrabánková M. (1997). Vize rozvoje venkovského prostoru na přelomu tisíciletí (pp. 30-34). In Český venkov na přelomu tisíciletí. Praha: Czech University of Life Sciences.

  • [21] Jones O. (1995). Lay discourses of the rural: developments and implications for rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies 11(1) 35-49. Doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(94)00057-G.

  • [22] Krippendorf K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodologies. London: Sage.

  • [23] Librová H. (1996). Decentralizace osídlení – vize a realita. Část první: vize postoje k venkovu a potenciální migrace v ČR. Sociologický časopis 32(3) 285-296.

  • [24] Lutz C. & Collins J. (1993). Reading National Geographic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • [25] Majerová V. (2006). Změny českého venkova z pohledu sociologických výzkumů (pp. 403-409). In Majerová V. ed. Venkov je náš svět – sborník příspěvků z mezinárodní konference Praha: Czech University of Life Sciences.

  • [26] Majerová V. et al. (2003). Český venkov 2003: situace před vstupem do EU. Praha: Česká zemědělská univerzita.

  • [27] Majerová V. et al. (2005). Český venkov 2005: rozvoj venkovské společenosti. Praha: Česká zemědělská univerzita.

  • [28] Majerová V. Kostelecký T. & Sýkora L. (2011). Sociální kapitál a rozvoj regionu: příklad kraje Vysočina. Praha: Grada.

  • [29] Marsden T. Lowe P. & Whatmore S. (1990). Rural restructuring: global processes and their responses. London: David Fulton.

  • [30] Mingay G. E ed. (1989). The Rural Idyll. London: Routledge.

  • [31] Moscovici S. & Duveen G. (2000). Social representations: explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity press.

  • [32] Nash K. (2001). The ‘Cultural Turn’ in Social Theory: Towards a Theory of Cultural Politics. Sociology 35(1) 77-92. Doi: 10.1177/0038038501035001006.

  • [33] Nora P. (1989). Between memory and history. Representations 26 7-24. Doi: 10.2307/2928520.

  • [34] NSPRV (2006). Národní strategický plán rozvoje venkova České republiky na období 2007-2013. Prague: Ministry of Agriculture.

  • [35] Panofsky E. (1981). Význam ve výtvarném umění. Praha: Odeon.

  • [36] Phillips M. Fish R. & Agg J. (2001). Putting together ruralities: towards a symbolic analysis of rurality on the British mass media. Journal of Rural Studies 17 (1) 1-27. Doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00015-2.

  • [37] Philo C. (1992). Neglected rural geographies: a review. Journal of Rural Studies 8(2) 193-207. Doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(92)90077-J.

  • [38] Pokorný M. (2012). Venkov (1973-1988): Novohradsko. Praha: Triton.

  • [39] Pospěch P. (2014). Discursive no man’s land: Analysing the discourse of the rural in the transitional Czech Republic. Journal of Rural Studies 34(4) 96-107. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.006.

  • [40] Rose G. (2001). Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: SAGE.

  • [41] Short B. (1992). The English rural community: Image and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • [42] Svendsen G. (2004). The right to development: construction of a non-agriculturalist discourse of rurality in Denmark. Journal of Rural Studies 20 79-94. Doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00045-7.

  • [43] Svobodová H. & Věžník A. (2014). Úvod do geografie venkova. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

  • [44] Sztopmka P. (2005). Vizuální sociologie. Praha: SLON.

  • [45] Urry J. (1990). The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

  • [46] Vepsäläinen M. & Pitkänen K. (2010). Second home countryside. Representations of the rural in Finnish popular discourses. Journal of Rural Studies 26(4) 194-204. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.07.002.

  • [47] Vobecká J. (2009). Czech rural development policies for human resources after 2004: a story of muddled definitions preventing strategic visions. Central European Journal of Public Policy 3(1) 44-65.

  • [48] Ward N. (1993). The agricultural treadmill and the rural environment in the post-productivist era. Sociologia Ruralis 33 (3-4) 348-364. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1993.tb00969.x.

  • [49] Williams R. (1973). The country and the city. Oxford: Oxford university press.

  • [50] Winchester H. & Rofe M. W. (2005). Christmas in the ‘Valley of Praise’: Intersections of the rural idyll heritage and community in Lobethal South Australia. Journal of Rural Studies 21 (3) 265-279. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.05.008.

  • [51] Winther M. & Svendsen G. (2012). ‘The Rotten Banana’ fires back: The story of a Danish discourse of inclusive rurality in the making. Journal of Rural Studies 28(4) 466-477. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.05.003.

  • [52] Woods M. (2005). Rural geography. London: SAGE.

  • [53] Woods M. & McDonagh J. (2011). Rural Europe and the world: globalization and rural development. European Countryside 3(3) 153-163. Doi: 10.2478/v10091-012-0001-z.

  • [54] Woodward R. (1996). “Deprivation” and “the rural”: an investigation into contradictory discourses. Journal of Rural Studies 12(1) 55-67. Doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(95)00048-8.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.651

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1475 900 249
PDF Downloads 1407 941 267