Researching Elements of Cross-Border Social Cohesion: the Case of Slovene Border Areas

Abstract

The article discusses the possibility of “measuring” the intensity of cross-border cohesion and co-dependence on the case of Slovene border areas. It presents first an overview of how geography has studied and interpreted borders, and what an impact had borders on both space and society. The author then analyses both qualitative and quantitative structure of border areas prior to Slovenia’s admission to the Schengen Space and explores recent changes after 2007, when border controls on the major part of his borders where eliminated. These developments produced several spatial and social (re)integration trends that have been detected in the author’s analyses through some comparable research methods and indicators, permitting also to rank Slovenian border sections and individual sub-areas by the intensity and quality of their cross-border cohesion.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Bufon, M. (1993). Elementi obmejnosti in faktorji oblikovanja prekomejnih območij na primeru Slovenije. Dela 10, 99-109.

  • [2] Bufon, M. (1995). Prostor, meje, ljudje - razvoj prekomejnih odnosov, struktura obmejnega območja in vrednotenje obmejnosti na Goriškem. Trieste, Slori.

  • [3] Bufon, M. (1996). Naravne, kulturne in družbene meje. Annales 8, 177-186.

  • [4] Bufon, M. (1998). Le regioni transfrontaliere nel processo di unificazione europea. In: Bonavero, P. & Dansero, E., eds., L'Europa delle regioni e delle reti (pp. 126-142). Torino, Utet.

  • [5] Bufon, M. (2001a): Geografija obmejnosti, čezmejne regije in oblike čezmejne povezanosti. Geografski vestnik 73(2), 9-24.

  • [6] Bufon, M. (2001b). Oblikovanje čezmejnih vezi na tromeji med Slovenijo, Hrvaško in Italijo v Istri. Dela 16, 39-60.

  • [7] Bufon, M. (2002). Slovenia - a European contact and border area. Annales 11(2), 445-472.

  • [8] Bufon, M. (2006a): Geography of border landscapes, borderlands and Euroregions in the enlarged EU. Rivista geografica italiana 113(1), 47-72.

  • [9] Bufon, M. (2006b). Between social and spatial convergence and divergence - an exploration into the political geography of European contact areas. GeoJournal 66(4), 341-352. Doi: 10.1007/s10708-006-9008-1.

  • [10] Bufon, M. (2008). Na obrobju ali v osredju? Slovenska obmejna območja pred izzivi evropskega povezovanja. Koper: Založba Annales.

  • [11] Bufon, M. (2010). Geografija in medkulturnost. In Sedmak, M. & Ženko, E., eds., Razprave o medkulturnosti (pp. 89-112). Koper: Univerzitetna založba Annales.

  • [12] Bufon, M. (2011). »Ne vrag, le sosed bo mejak!« Upravljanje integracijskih procesov v obmejnih območjih. Koper: Univerzitetna založba Annales.

  • [13] House, J. W. (1981). Frontier studies - an applied approach. In Burnett, A. D. & Taylor, P. J., eds., Political Studies from Spatial Perspectives (pp. 291-312). New York, Wiley.

  • [14] Maier, J., Paesler, R., Ruppert, K. & Schaffer, F. (1977). Sozialgeographie. Braunschweig: Georg Westermann Verlag.

  • [15] Paasi, A. (2009). Bounded spaces in a 'borderless world: border studies, power and the anatomy of territory. Journal of Power 2(2), 213-234. Doi: 10.1080/17540290903064275.

  • [16] Prescott, J. R. V. (1987). Political Frontiers and Boundaries. London: Allen & Unwin.

  • [17] Reynolds, D. R. & McNulty, M. L. (1971). On the analysis of political boundaries as barriers - a perceptual approach. East Lake Geographer 23, 21-38.

  • [18] Rumley, D. & Minghi, J. V. (1991). The Geography of Border Landscapes. London: Routledge.

  • [19] Segall, M. H. et al. (1966). The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Meriell.

  • [20] Sonnenfeld, J. (1976). Geography, perception, and the behavioral environment. In English, J. & Mayfield, S., eds., Man, Space, and Environment (pp. 244-251). New York: Wiley.

  • [21] Strassoldo, R., ed. (1973). Confini e regioni. Trieste: Lint.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search