Assessment of support for farms in the Czech less favoured areas with special regards to cattle breeding

Open access

Assessment of support for farms in the Czech less favoured areas with special regards to cattle breeding

The article presents an impact analysis of the current agricultural policy on the economy of farms in the Czech less favoured areas (LFAs) and on environment and employment in these areas. A multi-criteria impact assessment shows that under the Czech conditions for supports in the LFAs the economic situation of larger extensive farms, measured by the farm net value added per one annual working unit, is very good even in comparison with farms in the regions with the best natural conditions and out of the LFAs. On the other hand, these farms - with an extensive cattle breeding as usually - operate with very low labour inputs and they realise inadequate rents. A decrease or elimination of the rents is possible by changes in conditions for LFA supports, for example by a degresivity of rates and/or by a capping of the supports, or by the distribution of the LFA payments on the whole area of eligible agricultural land.

Balmann, A. (2000). Modelling land use with Multi-agent Systems - Perspectives for the analysis of agricultural policies. IIFET 2000 Proceedings on

Bernués, A., Ruiz, R., Olaizola, A., Villalba, D. & Casasús, I. (2011). Sustainability of pasture-based livestock farming systems in the European Mediterranean context: Synergies and trade-offs. Livestock Science, 139(1/2), 44-57. Doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.018.

Bašek, V. et al. (2011). Working document for the Ministry of Agriculture on the economy of dairy and suckler cows breeding. IAEI.

Chaplin, H., Davidova, S. & Gortom, M. (2004). Agricultural adjustment and the diversification of farm households and corporate farms in Central Europe. Journal of Rural Studies 20(1), 61-77. Doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00043-3.

Cooper, T. et al. (2006). An evaluation of the Less Favoured Area measure in the 25 member states of the European Union. Report for DG AGRI. Institute for European Environmental Policy London.

Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 on Rural Development Support by Means of the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGGF); Brussels.

Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).

Crabtree, R. et al. (2003a). Review of Area - based Less Favoured Area Payments Across EU Member States; Report for the Land Use Policy Group of the GB statutory conservation, countryside and environment agency. Oxford: CJC Consulting.

Crabtree, R et al. (2003b). Review of Area - based Less Favoured Area payments Across Great Britain; Final report for the Land Use Policy Group of the GB statutory conservation, countryside and environment agencies. Oxford.

Czech Ministry of Agriculture - Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information (2004 - 2010). Zprávy o stavu zemědělství ČR 2004 - 2010. Praha: Czech Ministry of Agriculture.

Dax, T. (2009). Recognising the amenities of mountain agriculture in Europe, Mountain Forum Bulletin 9(1), 3-5.

Deblitz, C., Balliet, U., Krebs, S. & Rump, M. (1994). Extensive Grūnlandnutzung in den östlichen Bundesländern. Schiftenreihe des Bundesministeriums fūr Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten. Reihe A: Angewandte Wissenschaft Heft 429.

Deblitz, C. et al. (2009). Beef Report 2009. Braunschweig: Johann Heinrich von Thūnen-Institut.

Hemme, T. et al. (2010). Dairy Report 2010. International Farm Comparison Network, Kiel: Dairy Research Center.

Hovorka G. (2004). Den Bergbauernbetrieben wird nichts geschenkt. Forschungsbericht Nr. 52. Wien: Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen.

Falconer, K. & Whitby, M. (2000). Untangling red tape: scheme administration and the invisible costs of European agri-environmental policy. European Environment, 10(4), 193-203.

Gwyn, D. et al. (2003). A review of the CAP rural development plan 2000 - 2006: Implications for natural heritage. The Heritage Council of Ireland Series.

Kirner, L. (2011). Wettbewerbsfähige Rinderhaltung in Ősterreich nach Auslaufen der Marktordnungsprämien im Jahr 2013. Agrarpolitischer Arbeitsbehelf Nr. 40. Wien: Bundesanstalt fūr Agrarwirtschaft.

Kopeček, P., Foltýn, I. & Bjelka, M. (2008). Ekonomika chovu krav bez tržní produkce mléka. In Šetrné čerpání přírodních zdrojů a údržba krajiny pomocí chovu krav bez tržní produkce mléka (pp. 67-75). Rapotín: Research Institute for Cattle Breeding Ltd.

Kvapilík, J. (2011). Zemědělská produkce a přímé platby v unii a ČR. Náš chov, 71(5), 17 - 21.

Špička, J. Boudný, J. & Janotová, B. (2009). The role of subsidies in managing the operating risk of agricultural enterprises. Agricultural Economics (Czech), 55(4), 169 - 180.

Štolbová, M. et al. (2007). Problematika méně příznivých oblastí. Praha: Research Institute of Agricultural Economics.

Štolbová, M., Hlavsa, T. & Lekešová, M. (2010). Methods of calculating the handicaps of less favoured natural conditions. Agricultural Economic (Czech), 56(5), 215 - 223.

Štolbová M. at al. (2011). Podpory pro podniky v méně příznivých oblastech. (Supports for the farms in less-favored areas). Report to the Ministry of Agriculture No. 40, Praha: Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information.

The European Commission (2008). Review of the less favoured areas scheme. Public consultation document for impact assessment. Brussels

The European Commission (2009). Peak performance. New Insights into Mountain Farming in the European Union, SEC (2009) [Commission staff working document], Brussels.

The European Commission (2010a). EUROPE 2020 a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. [Communication from the Commission]. Brussels.

The European Commission (2010b). The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future. Brussels.

The European Commission (2011). Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). Brussels.

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.607


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 66 66 10
PDF Downloads 22 22 4