New ideas for old landscapes: using a social-ecological approach for conservation of traditional rural biotopes - a case study from Finland

Open access

New ideas for old landscapes: using a social-ecological approach for conservation of traditional rural biotopes - a case study from Finland

Traditional rural biotopes (TRBs) are high nature value farmlands (HNV). There are only 20.000 ha of identifiableTRB left in Finland. Ecosystem services were explored as a way of better understanding the value of TRBs to society. Postal questionnaires were sent out to all farmers in Raasepori Municipality in SW Finland to locate TRBs. Frequency of on-farm tourism, direct sales and services to the public were compared between farms with and without TRBs. Return rate for questionnaires (n=326) was 40%. Farms with TRBs had a higher rate of services and sales to the general public. A third of respondents with TRBs said their TRBs provide non-agricultural goods or services and 1/4 said their TRBs are utilized by people from off-farm. Changes in policy toward more evidence-based approaches, adaptive management and consideration of ecosystem services could improve conservation of TRBs.

Ahlenius, H. (2001). UNEP/GRID-Arendal, Baltic Sea drainage basin, UNEP/GRID-Arendal Maps and Graphics Library http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/baltic_sea_drainage_basin

Allen, C., Fontaine, J., Pope, K. & Garmestani, A. (2011). Adaptive management for a turbulent future. Journal of Environmental Management 92(5), 1339-1345. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.019

Andersen, E., Baldock, D., Bennett, H., Beaufoy, G., Bignal, E., Brouwer, F., Elbersen, B., Eiden, G., Godeschalk, F., Jones, G., McCracken, D., Nieuwenhuizen, W., van Eupen, M., Hennekens, S., & Zervas, G. (2003). Developing a High Nature Value Farming Area Indicator.___Internal Report for the European Environment Agency. IEEP, 2007. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/agriculture-area-under-management-practices/developing-a-high-nature-value (accessed 19/3/2011) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/agriculture-area-under-management-practices/developing-a-high-nature-value

Beaufoy, G. & Cooper, T. (2009). Guidance Document: the Application of the High Nature Value Indicator 2007-2013. European Communities http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/hnv/guidance_en.pd.f. (accessed 30/1/2011) http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/hnv/guidance_en.pdf

Benstead, P.J., Jose, P.V., Joyce, C.B., Wade, P.M. & (1999). European Wet Grassland: Guidelines for Management and Restoration. RSPB, Sandy.

Berkes, F., Colding, J. & Folk, C. (2008). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press.

Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods: 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.

Denscombe, M. (2007). The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 3rd edition. Mcgraw Hill Open University Press.

EEA (2004). High Nature Value Farmland: Characteristics, Trends and Policy Challenges. EEA Report 1/2004 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/report_2004_1

EEA (2010). 10 Messages for 2010: Cultural Landscapes and Biodiversity Heritage. European Environment Agency, Denmark. Doi: 10.2800/5664 http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/10-messages-for-2010-2013

Ekenäs Stad (Tammisaari/Ekenäs Municipality, now Raasepori Municipality), 2006. Skärlandet Landskapsvårdsomrade: Skötsel- och Användningsplan/Skärlandet Maisema-Alue: Hoito- ja Käyttösuunnitelma (Skärlandet Landscape Conservation Area: Management and Use plan). (In Swedish and Finnish, summary in English).

Gregory, R., Ohlson, D. & Arvai, J. (2006). Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management. Ecological Applications 16, 2411-2425. Doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2411:DAMCFA]2.0.CO;2

Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. (2010). Chapter 6: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Raffaelli, D.G. and C.L.J. Frid (Eds.), Ecosystem Ecology: A Synthesis (pp. 110-139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heliölä J., Lehtomäki, J., Kuussaari, M., Tiainen, J., Piha, M., Lehtonen, H., Miettinen, A. & Koikkalainen, K., 2009. Luonnoltaan Arvokkaat Maatalousalueet Suomessa- Määrittely, Seuranta ja Hoidon Taloudelliset Edellytykset. MMM 1/2009. Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy. http://www.mmm.fi/attachments/mmm/julkaisut/julkaisusarja/2009/5HZiK6×4l/MMMjulkaisu2009_1.pdf

Kröger, L. (2005), Development of the Finnish agri-environmental policy as a learning process. European Environment 15, 13-26. Doi: 10.1002/eet.370

Marini, L., Klimek, S. & Battisti, A. (2011). Mitigating the impacts of the decline of traditional farming on mountain landscapes and biodiversity: a case study in the European Alps. Environmental Science & Policy 14(3), 258-267. Doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.003

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003). Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: A Framework for Assessment._Washington D.C: Island Press http://www.maweb.org/en/Framework.aspx

Newcome, J., Provins, A., Johns, H., Ozdemiroglu, E. & Ghazoul, J. (2005). Economic, Social and Ecological Value of Ecosystem Services: Literature Review. Final Report for Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). London: Economics for Environment Consultancy (EFTEC).

Pullin, A.S., & Knight, T.M. (2003). Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach. Journal for Nature Conservation 11(2), 83-90. Doi: 1381/03/11/02-083

Pullin, A.S., Báldi, A., Can, O.E., Dieterich, M., Kati, V., Livoreil, B., Lövei, G., Mihok, B., Nevin, O., Selva, N. & Sousa-Pinto, I. (2009). Conservation focus on Europe: major conservation policy issues that need to be informed by conservation science. Conservation Biology 23(4), 818-824. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01283.x

Pitkänen, M. & Tiainen, J. (2001). Biodiversity of Agricultural Landscapes in Finland. Birdlife Finland Conservation Series no 3. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.

Pykälä, J. & Bonn, T. (2000). Traditional Rural Biotopes in the Province of Uusimaa. Regional Environmental Publications 178. Finnish Environment Institute, Uusimaa Regional Environment Centre. Edita Ltd.

Pykälä, J. (2000). Mitigating human effects on European biodiversity through traditional animal husbandry. Conservation Biology. 14(3), 705-712. Doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99119.x.

Raunio, A., Schulman, A. & Kontula, T. (Eds.), 2008. Assessment of Threatened Habitat Types in Finland-Parts 1 & 2. The Finnish Environment 8/2008. Finnish Environment Institute. Vammala Kirjapaino OY, Vammala. English summary: http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=86834&lan=en. http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=86834&lan=en

Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D. & Bennett, E.M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analysing trade-offs in diverse landscapes. PNAS 107(11), 5242-5247. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907284107

Salminen, P. & Kekäläinen, H. (Eds.), 2000. Perinnebiotooppien Hoito Suomessa. Perinnemaisemien Hoitotyöryhmän Mietintö. Finnish Environment Institute 443. Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.

Schultz, L., Folke, C. & Olsson, P. (2007). Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation 34(2), 140-152. DOI:10.1017/S0376892907003876.

Siebert, R., Toogood, M. & Knierim, A. (2006). Factors affecting European farmers' participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4), 318-340. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x

Sutherland, W.J., Pullin, A.S., Dolman, P.M. & Knight, T.M. (2004). The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 19(6), 305-308. Doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018

SYSTAT 12, 2007. Copyright © 2007 by SYSTAT Software, Inc. SYSTAT Software, Inc. Chicago, IL.

Tike Information Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland, 2011. Matilda Agricultural Statistics. http://www.maataloustilastot.fi/maatilojen-rakenne

Vainio, M., Kekäläinen, H., Alanen, A. & Pykälä, J. (2001). Finnish Traditional Rural Biotopes: Final Report of the National Traditional Rural Biotope Project (Finnish only). Finnish Environment no. 527. Finnish Environment Institute. Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy, Vammala. http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?contentid=49914&lan=fi http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?contentid=49914&lan=fi

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.607

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 94 94 21
PDF Downloads 25 25 10