Agriculture and landscape in the 21st century Europe: the post-communist transition

Open access

Agriculture and landscape in the 21st century Europe: the post-communist transition

The most important recent political development has been the accession to the European Union in 2004 of eight former communist states and their integration to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The CAP as a largely uniform policy trying to cater for the needs of the very varied agricultural industry in 27 states across both Eastern and Western Europe is itself undergoing a radical transformation as politicians attempt to shift the main focus of its activities from production subsidies to a more broadly conceived sustainable rural development strategy. The paper concludes that for these changes to be managed effectively and to support stable and sustainable rural landscapes there must be publicly-led regional strategies in place.

Andersen, E., A. Rutherford & M. Winter (2000). The beef regime. In: Brouwer, F. & P. Lowe (eds.) CAP Regimes and the European Countryside. Prospects for Integration between Agricultural, Regional and Environmental Policies (pp. 55-70), Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

Blacksell, M. (2006). Political Geography. London: Routledge.

Blacksell, M. & K. M. Born (2002a). Private property restitution: the geographical consequences of official government policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Geographical Journal 168:178-190.

Blacksell, M. & K. M. Born (2002b). Rural property restitution in Germany's New Bundesländer: the case of Bergholz. Journal of Rural Studies 18(3), 325-338. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00009-8

Cobb, D., P. Dolman & T. O'Riordan (1999). Interpretations of sustainable agriculture in the UK. Progress in Human Geography 23(2), 209-35

Commission of the European Communities (1998). Agenda 2000: commission proposals. COM (98) 158 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Commission of the European Communities (2002). Enlargement and agriculture: successfully integrating the new Member States into the CAP. SEC (2002) 95 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Commission of the European Communities (2004). Proposal for a council regulation on support to rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. An extended impact assessment. COM (2004) 490 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Council of the European Communities (1999). Support for rural development from the European Agricultural and Guidance Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain regulations. Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Council of the European Communities (2005). Support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Crescenzi, R. (2004). EU agricultural policy and the regional differentiation of agriculture in Poland. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Regional Studies Association on Europe at the Margins: EU Regional Policy, Peripherality and Rurality. France: Angers.

Department for Rural Affairs (2003). The mid-term evaluation of the Leader+ programme. ADAS Consulting Limited & SQW Limited. London: Department for Rural Affairs.

Firbank, L. G. (2005). Striking a new balance between agricultural production and biodiversity. Annals of Applied Biology 146: 163-75.

Getimis, P. (2003). Improving the European Union regional policy by learning from the past in view of enlargement. European Planning Studies 11(1), 77-87. DOI: 10.1080/09654310303662

Gray, J. (2000). The common agricultural policy and the reinvention of the rural in the European community. Sociologia Ruralis 40(1), 30-52.

Holloway, L., R. Cox, L. Venn, M. Kneafsey, L. Dowler & H. Tuomainen (2006). Managing sustainable farmed landscapes through ‘alternative’ food networks: a case study from Italy. Geographical Journal 176(3), 219-229. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2006.00205.x

Jongman, R. H. G. (2002). Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions. Landscape and Urban Planning 58(2-4), 211-221. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00222-5

Judt, T. (2005). Postwar. A history of Europe since 1945. London: William Heinemann.

Kelch, D. (1999). EU's Agenda 2000 and beyond. US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Outlook.

Kostov, P. & J. Lingard (2002). Subsistence farming in transitional economies: lessons from Bulgaria. Journal of Rural Studies 18(1), 83-94. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00026-2

Lerman, Z., C. Csaki & G. Feder (2004). Agriculture in transition: land policies and evolving farm structures in post-soviet countries. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Lloyd, G., J. McCarthy & B. Illsley (2004). Commercial and industrial developments in national parks in England and Wales: lessons for the Scottish agenda. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 6(3-4) 289-304. DOI: 10.1080/1523908042000344078

Lowe, P., H. Buller & N. Ward (2002). Setting the next agenda? British and French approaches to the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy. Journal of Rural Studies 181) 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00025-0

Lowe, P. & N. Ward (1998). Regional policy, CAP reform and rural development in Britain: the challenge for New Labour. Regional Studies 32, 469-474.

Mander, Ü. & R. H. G. Jongman (1998). Human impact on rural landscapes in Central and Northern Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 41, 149-153.

Marsden, T. (1995). Beyond agriculture? Regulating the new rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies 11, 285-296.

McCarthy, J., G. Lloyd & B. Illsley (2002). National parks in Scotland: balancing environment and economy. European Planning Studies 10(5), 665-670. DOI: 10.1080/09654310220145387

Palang, H., Ü. Mander & A. Luud (1998). Landscape diversity changes in Estonia. Landscape and Urban Planning 41(3-4, 163-169. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00055-3

Palang, H., H. Alumäe & Ü. Mander (2000). Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 50(1-3), 85-94. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00081-5

Pedroli, B. (2004). Die europäische Landschaft, was tun wir mit ihr? Natur 2, 2-5.

Ray, C. (2002). A mode of production for fragile rural economies: the territorial accumulation of forms of capital. Journal of Rural Studies 18, 225-231.

Rizov, M. (2006). Rural development perspectives in enlarging Europe: the implications of CAP reforms and agricultural transition in accession countries. European Planning Studies 14, 219-238.

Semm, K. & H. Palang (2004). Lifeways in the Setu cultural landscape. Pro Ethnologia 18: Culture and Environments, pp. 49-67.

Swinbank, A. (1999). CAP reform and the WTO: compatibility and developments. European Review of Agricultural Economics 26, 389-407.

Swinbank, A. (2005). Developments in the Doha Round and WTO dispute settlement: some implications for EU agricultural policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics 32(4), 551-561. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbi030

Thompson, A. R. (2005). Agriculture in future rural landscapes: opportunities through innovative research in applied biology. Annals of Applied Biology 146(2), 135-136.

United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (2007). http://www.unep-wcmc.org/forest/data/cdrom2/eutabs.htm

Vos, W. & H. Meekes (1999). Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning 46(1-3), 3-14. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2

Wascher, D. & M. Perez-Soba (eds.) (2004). Learning from European Traditional Landscapes-A Project in Support of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Europe Report 964. Wageningen: University of Wageningen.

Wichern, R. (2004). Economics of the Common Agricultural Policy. European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs: Economic Papers 211. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.607

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 128 128 18
PDF Downloads 31 31 10