Healthy Ageing in Smart Villages? Observations from the Field

Lorna Philip 1  and Fiona Williams 2
  • 1 Department of Geography and Environment, School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen
  • 2 Department of Geography and International Development, University of Chester


In the context of demographically ageing communities across rural Europe Smart Villages have considerable potential to promote ageing healthy. Whilst in principle supporting healthy ageing in the context of the Smart Village might appear a relatively straightforward endeavour, in operational terms, successful development of smart, 21st century villages relies upon, and sometimes assumes, an appropriate interplay of socio-technological factors. Articulated through a lens provided by the digital ecosystem model advocated by the European Network for Rural Development (2018), this paper offers some observations from the field. We acknowledge the challenges faced by remote rural places in their journey to become ‘smart places’ and identify formal and informal interventions that could better position rural communities to become part of a wider, smart society.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Angelidou, M. (2015). Smart cities: a conjecture of four forces. Cities, 47, 95–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004.

  • [2] Ash, J., Kitchin, R. & Leszczynski, A. (2019). Introducing Digital Geographies. In Ash, J., Kitchin, R. & Leszczynski, A., eds., Digital Geographies. (pp.1–10). London: Sage.

  • [3] Ash, J., Kitchin, R. & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1) 25–43. DOI: 10.1177/0309132516664800.

  • [4] Caprotti, F. & Cowley, R. (2019). Varieties of smart urbanism in the UK: Discursive logics, the state and local urban context. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44(3), 587–601. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12284.

  • [5] Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C. & Nijkamp, B. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology 18(2) 65–82. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.

  • [6] Corbett, S. & Williams, F. (2014) Striking a professional balance: interactions between nurses and their older rural patients British Journal of Community Nursing 19(4), 162–167. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2014.19.4.162.

  • [7] Currie, M., Philip, L., Roberts, A. (2015). “I don’t mind it, but it can take over, it can make things over-complicated…” Attitudes towards, use and acceptance of technology in rural healthcare: a case study of rural adults living with chronic pain. BMC Health Services Research 15:162. DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-0825-0

  • [8] Dodge, M. (2019). Rural. In: Ash, J., Kitchin, R. & Leszczynski, A., eds., Digital Geographies (pp.36–48). London: Sage.

  • [9] Dowds, G., Philip, L. J., & Currie, M. (2018). A window to the outside world: digital technologies and new possibilities for involving rural housebound older adults in local social activities. In Curl, A. & Musselwhite, C., eds., Geographies of transport and ageing (pp. 101–132). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • [10] Doyle, J., Skrba, Z., McDonnell, R. & Arent, B. (2010). Designing a Touch Screen Communication Device to Support Social Interaction Amongst Older Adults. In McEwan, T. & McKinnon, L., eds., Proceedings of the 2010 British Computer Society Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, {BCS-HCI} 2010, Dundee, United Kingdom, 610 September 2010 (pp. 117–185). London: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT. DOI: 10.14236/ewic/HCI2010.23.

  • [11] Jong, M. de, Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C. & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable – smart – resilient – low carbon – eco – knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production 109, 25–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004.

  • [12] König, R., Seifert, A. & Doh, M. (2018). Internet use among older Europeans: an analysis based on SHARE data. Universal Access in the Information Society 17(3), 621–633. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5.

  • [13] Luque-Ayala, A. (2019). Urban. In Ash, J., Kitchin, R. & Leszczynski, A., eds., Digital Geographies (pp. 24-35). London: Sage.

  • [14] Mort, A. & Philip, L. (2014). Social isolation and the perceived importance of in-person care amongst rural older adults with chronic pain: a review and emerging research agenda. Journal of Pain Management 7(1), 13–22.

  • [15] Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H. & Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies 40, 90–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006.

  • [16] Nilssen, M. (2019). To the smart city and beyond? Developing a typology of smart urban innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 98–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.060.

  • [17] Peters, D. J., Hamideh, S., Eman Zarecor, K. & Ghandour, M. (2018). Using entrepreneurial social infrastructure to understand smart shrinkage in small towns. Journal of Rural Studies 64, 39–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.10.001.

  • [18] Philip, L., Roberts, A., Currie, M. & Mort, A. (2015). Technology for Older adults: maximising Personal and Social interaction (TOPS): exploring opportunities for eHealth to support the older rural population with chronic pain. Scottish Geographical Journal 131(3–4), 181–193. DOI 10.1080/14702541.2014.978806.

  • [19] Philip, L. J. & Williams, F. (2019). Remote rural home based businesses and digital exclusion: understanding needs and expectations in a digitally underserved community Journal of Rural Studies 68, 306–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.011.

  • [20] Philip, L. J., Cottrill, C. & Farrington, J (2015). ‘Two-speed’ Scotland: patterns and implications of the digital divide in contemporary. Scotland Scottish Geographical Journal 131(3–4), 148–170. DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2015.1067327.

  • [21] Philip, L. J., Cottrill, C., Farrington, J., Williams, F. & Ashmore, F. (2017). The digital divide: patterns, public policy and options for connecting the ‘final few’ in rural communities across Great Britain. Journal of Rural Studies 54, 386–398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.002.

  • [22] Philip, L, Brown, D. & Stockdale, A. (2012). Demographic ageing in rural areas: insights from the UK and US. In Shucksmith, M., Brown, D., Warner, M., Vergunst, J. & Shortall, S., eds., Rural Transformations and Policies in the UK and US (pp. 58–78). London: Routledge.

  • [23] Salemink, K., Strijker, D. & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: a systematic literature review on unequal availability, adoption and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 54, 360–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001.

  • [24] Torre-Díez, I. de la, López-Coronado, M., Vaca, C., Aguado, J. S. & de Castro, C. (2015). Cost-Utility and Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Telemedicine, Electronic, and Mobile Health Systems in the Literature: A Systematic Review. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 21(2), 81–85. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0053.

  • [25] Visvizi, A. & Lytras, M. D. (2018). It’s Not a Fad: Smart Cities and Smart Villages Research in European and Global Contexts. Sustainability 10(8), 2727. DOI: 10.3390/su10082727.

  • [26] Williams, F., Farrington, J. & Philip, L. J. (2015). ‘It’s revolutionised how we do things’: then and now – a case study of Internet behaviours in a remote rural community. In Sutherland, L-A. et al., eds., Places of Possibility? Rural Societies in a Neoliberal World (pp. 203–204). Aberdeen: the James Hutton Institute.

  • [27] Williams, F., Philip, L. J., Farrington, J. & Fairhurst, G. (2016). ‘Digital by Default’ and the ‘hard to reach’: exploring solutions to digital exclusion in remote rural areas. Local Economy 31(7), 257–777. DOI: 10.1177/0269094216670938.

  • [28] Zavratnik, V., Kos, A. & Stojmenova, E. (2018). Smart Villages: Comprehensive Review of Initiatives and Practices. Sustainability 10(7), 2559. DOI: 10.3390/su10072559.

  • [29] Community Catalysts C.I.C. (2019). We are Community Catalysts. Available at

  • [30] European Commission (2016). Cork Declaration 2.0 A Better Life in Rural Areas. Available at

  • [31] European Commission (2017). EU Action for Smart Villages. Released 11 April 2017. Available at

  • [32] European Commission (2018a). Creating a Digital Society. Released 4 July 2018. Available at

  • [33] European Commission (2018b). Policies for Ageing Well with Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Updated 1 October 2018. Available at

  • [34] European Network for Rural Development (2018). Smart Villages Revitalising Rural services, EU Rural Review no 26, May 2018 (English language version). Available at

  • [35] European Network for Rural Development (2019a). How to support Smart Villages strategies which effectively empower rural communities. Orientations for policy makers and implementers. Available at

  • [36] European Network for Rural Development (2019b). Smart Villageshow to ensure that digital strategies benefit rural communities. Orientations for policy-makers and implementers. Available at

  • [37] Eurostat (2017). “A look at the lives of the elderly in the EU today”. Available at

  • [39] Gov.UK Digital Marketplace (n.d.) TRIBE: Social Action and Community Capacity. Available at

  • [40] Howells, R. (2018). The Tribe Project. Available at

  • [41] Nieto, E. (2019). Smart Villages: A new concept for rural development. Available at

  • [42] Office for National Statistics (2018). Statistical Bulletin Internet users, UK: 2018. Internet use in the UK annual estimates by age, sex, disability and geographical location. Released 31 May 2018.

  • [44] Scottish Government (2018). Percentage age distribution of Population by Geographic Area, 2016, Equality Evidence Finder, Summary Rural and Environment. Available at

  • [45] Soto, P. & Nieto, E. (2019). Rural Dialogues | Smart Villages – Turning Momentum into Support for Local Action Agricultural and Rural Convention, 15th July, 2019. Available at

  • [46] Tribe (2018). The Tribe Project. Available at

  • [47] World Health Organisation (2019). What is healthy ageing? Available at


Journal + Issues