Coastal Countryside Innovation Dynamics in North-Western Russia

Open access

Abstract

Coastal regions are generally conceived as highly advanced in terms of socioeconomic and innovative development. Acting as international contact zones, coastal agglomerations are described as gateways for absorbing new knowledge, technologies, business cultures, etc. Yet, this perception is based on studies of large coastal cities and agglomerations. In our study, we focus on coastalization effects manifested in rural settlements and evaluate the innovation capability of the economies of coastal rural areas. The research scope covers 13 municipalities of the Leningrad region, including 134 rural settlements. The research methodology is structured into three main blocks: the evaluation of the human capital, assessment of the favorability of the entrepreneurial environment, and analysis of susceptibility of local economies to innovations. The list of analyzed innovation dynamics parameters includes the geospatial data for the distribution of population, companies and individual entrepreneurs, localization of specialized support and innovation infrastructure, sectoral analysis of the economic structure, digitalization aspects, et cetera. The data coverage period is 2010–2019 with variations depending on the availability of individual indicators. The research findings reveal particular features of the countryside as compared to urban settlements. Strong asymmetries are observed between the development of rural settlements cross-influenced by coastalization, near-metropolitan location, and national border proximity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Anderson A. R. Wallace C. & Townsend L. (2016). Great Expectations or Small Country Living? Enabling Small Rural Creative Businesses with ICT. Sociologia Ruralis 56(3) 450–468. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12104.

  • [2] Balaguer P. Sarda R. Ruiz M. Diedrich A. Vizoso G. & Tintor E J. (2008). A proposal for boundary delimitation for integrated coastal zone management initiatives. Ocean and Coastal Management 51 806–814. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.08.003.

  • [3] Barragán J. M. & de Andrés M. (2015). Analysis and trends of the world’s coastal cities and agglomerations. Ocean and Coastal Management 114 11–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.004.

  • [4] Beach D. (2002). Coastal Sprawl: the effects of urban design on aquatic ecosystems in the United States. Arlington VA. Pew Oceans Commission.

  • [5] Bell S. Peña A. C. & Prem M. (2013). Imagine coastal sustainability. Ocean and Coastal Management 83 39–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.02.016.

  • [6] Blacksell M. (2010). Agriculture and Landscape in 21st Century Europe: The Post-Communist Transition. European Countryside 2(1) 13–24. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-010-0002-8.

  • [7] Boschma R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39 (1) 61–74. DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887.

  • [8] Cracknell A. P. (1999). Remote sensing techniques in estuaries and coastal zones – An update. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20(3) 485–496. DOI: 10.1080/014311699213280.

  • [9] Druzhinin A. G. & Lachininskii S. S. (2015). The place of the St. Petersburg coastal region in system of the leading coastal regions of Europe. Economy of the North-West: Issues and Prospects of Development. 4(49) 127–138. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25805440/

  • [10] Druzhinin A. G. Gorochnya V. V. Gontar N. V. Dets I. A. Lachininskii S. S. & Mikhailov A. S. (2017). Transboundary clusters in the coastal zones of the European part of Russia: inventory typology factors and prospects. Baltic Region 9(4) 21–32. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2017-4-2.

  • [11] Druzhinin A. G. Lachininskii S. S. & Shendrik A. V. (2018). The economic and residential dynamics of settlements of the Leningrad region: influence of factors of a cross-border clustering. Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society 150(3) 12–27.

  • [12] Emerton L. (2006). Counting coastal ecosystems as an economic part of development infrastructure Ecosystems and Livelihoods Group Asia. Colombo: World Conservation Union (IUCN).

  • [13] Faggio G. & Silva O. (2014). Self-employment and entrepreneurship in urban and rural labour markets. Journal of Urban Economics 84 67–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2014.09.001.

  • [14] Fedorov G. M. & Mikhaylov A. S. (2018). Regional divergence dynamics in the Baltic region: towards polarisation or equalization? Geographia Polonica 91(4) 399–411. DOI: 10.7163/GPol.0127.

  • [15] Hart L. G. Larson E. H. & Lishner D. M. (2005). Rural definitions for health policy and research. American Journal of Public Health 95(7) 1149–1155. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042432.

  • [16] Hinrichsen D. (1996). Coasts in Crisis. Issues in Science and Technology 12(4) 39–47.

  • [17] Korsgaard S. & Müller S. (2015). Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural – between place and space. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 21(1) 5–26. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-11-2013-0205.

  • [18] Kuznetsov S. V. Lachininskii S. S. & Shendrik A. V. (2017). The economic dynamics of urban settlements in the Leningrad region in 2011–2016 years. Economy of the North-West: Issues and Prospects of Development 3–4 (56–57) pp. 76–85. https://elibrary.ru/title_profile.asp?id=10506/

  • [19] Lachininskii S. S. & Semenova I. V. (2015). The St.-Petersburg coastal region: geoeconomic transformation of the territories. SPb Lema Print.

  • [20] Lang R. Fink M. & Kibler E. (2014). Understanding place-based entrepreneurship in rural Central Europe: A comparative institutional analysis. International Small Business Journal 32(2) 204–227. DOI: 10.1177/0266242613488614.

  • [21] Lang T. (2015). Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarisation and socio-spatial peripheralisation in central and Eastern Europe: A research agenda. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64(3) 171–185. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2.

  • [22] Leontidou L. & Marmaras E. (2001). From tourists to migrants: Residential tourism and ‘littoralisation’. In Apostolopoulos Y. Loukissas P. & Leontidou L. eds. Mediterranean tourism: Facets of socioeconomic development and cultural change (pp. 257–267). New York NY: Routledge.

  • [23] McFadden L. (2007). Governing Coastal Spaces: The Case of Disappearing Science in Integrated Coastal Zone Management Coastal Management 35(4) 429–443. DOI: 10.1080/08920750701525768.

  • [24] Mee L. (2012). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: the coastal zone in an era of globalisation. Estuarine Coast and Shelf Science 96 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2010.02.013.

  • [25] Mikhaylov A. S. Mikhaylova A. A. & Kuznetsova T. Yu. (2018). Coastalization effect and spatial divergence: segregation of European regions. Ocean and Coastal Management 161 57–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.04.024.

  • [26] Morrissey K. (2015). An inter and intra-regional exploration of the marine sector employment and deprivation in England. The Geographical Journal 181 295–303. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12099.

  • [27] Naldi L. Nilsson P. Westlund H. & Wixe S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies 40 90–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006.

  • [28] Pomianek I. & Chrzanowska M. (2016). A spatial comparison of semi-urban and rural gminas in Poland in terms of their level of socio-economic development using Hellwig’s method. Bulletin of Geography 33 103–117. DOI: 10.1515/bog-2016-0028.

  • [29] Puzanov K. A. (2012). Modern models of the spread of innovation: a critical analysis. Sociology of Power 6–7 (1) 82–99. https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/en/

  • [30] Roberts E. & Townsend L. (2016). The Contribution of the Creative Economy to the Resilience of Rural Communities: Exploring Cultural and Digital Capital. Sociologia Ruralis 56(2) 197–219. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12075.

  • [31] Ross A. (2008). The New Geography of Work: Power to the Precarious? Theory Culture and Society 25(8) 31–49. DOI: 10.1177/0263276408097795.

  • [32] Salemink K. Strijker D. & Bosworth G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability adoption and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 54 360–371. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001.

  • [33] Sánchez-Zamora P. Gallardo-Cobos R. & Ceña-Delgado F. (2014). Rural areas face the economic crisis: Analyzing the determinants of successful territorial dynamics. Journal of Rural Studies 35 11–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.03.007.

  • [34] Sayas J. P. (2000). Urban sprawl in the periurban coastal zones of Athens. The Greek Review of Social Research 121 71–104.

  • [35] Small C. Gornitz V. & Cohen J. E. (2000). Coastal hazards and the global distribution of human population. Environmental Geosciences 7(1) 3–12. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-0984.2000.71005.x.

  • [36] Small C. & Nicholls R. J. (2003). A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. Journal of Coastal Research 19(3) 584–599.

  • [37] Št’astná M. Toman F. Vaishar A. Woods M. & Vavrouchová H. (2013). European rural regions in the era of globalization: The South Moravia case study. Innovation 26(4) 354–364. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2013.849860.

  • [38] Šťastná M. Vaishar A. Vavrouchová H. Mašíček T. & Peřinková V. (2018). Values of a suburban landscape: Case study of Podolí u Brna (Moravia) The Czech Republic. Sustainable Cities and Society 40 383–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.034.

  • [39] Stonawská K. & Vaishar A. (2018). Differentiation and typology of the Moravian countryside. European Countryside 10(1) 127–140. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0008.

  • [40] Townsend L. Sathiaseelan A. Fairhurst G. & Wallace C. (2013). Enhanced broadband access as a solution to the social and economic problems of the rural digital divide. Local Economy 28(6) 580–595. DOI: 10.1177/0269094213496974.

  • [41] Townsend L. Wallace C. Fairhurst G. & Anderson A. (2017). Broadband and the creative industries in rural Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies 54 451–458. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.09.001.

  • [42] Vaishar A. Štastná M. & Stonawská K. (2015). Small towns – Engines of rural development in the South-Moravian region (Czechia): An analysis of the demographic development. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63(4) 1395–1405. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563041395.

  • [43] Voloshenko K. Yu. & Mikhailova A. A. (2012). Innovative factors and conditions of sustainable development of rural territories. Baltic Region 3(13) 79–87. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2012-3-7.

  • [44] Zubarevich N. V. (2010). Cities as centers of modernization of the economy and human capital. Social Sciences and Modernity 51(4) 3–27. DOI: 10.2753/SOR1061-0154510401.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.651

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 59 59 59
PDF Downloads 62 62 62