Smart Village Development Principles and Driving Forces: The Case of Lithuania

Open access

Abstract

Traditional and emerging interest networks supported by the advancement of digital and telecommunication technologies, the growing use of bioenergy and the ability to take advantage of knowledge beneficial for local populations and business development promote strategic breakthroughs of rural communities. The paper focuses on the problem of the smart village development with respect to a sustainable rural regional development. The aim of the research is to identify the preconditions for rural area progress and smart rural villages driving forces in Lithuania. The research object concerns the principles and driving forces of the development of smart villages. The research methods inter alia included analysis, systematization, and comparison of scientific literature, documents, and good practice examples. Analysis of the experiences of villages and local/international organizations and research into the best practices helped to identify the drivers and the key principles of the smart village development. The case study revealed that three out of five selected pilot rural areas of Lithuania have an innovative potential with some of the smart village principles adopted. The main constraints identified by the study were related to the lack of technological, digital or energy efficiency innovation and human resources in rural areas.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Atkočiūnienė V. Aleksandravičius A. Dautartė A. Vitunskienė V. & Zemeckis R. (2016). Ūkių modernizacija rinkų ir kaimo vystymosi kontekste: Lietuvos atvejis. Akademija: Mokslo studija.

  • [2] Baležentis A. (2011). Kaimo vietovių raida ir modeliai: darnaus vystymo požiūris Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development. 26(2) 31–38.

  • [3] Bock B. B. (2012). Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development. Studies in Agricultural Economics 114 57–63. DOI: 10.7896/j.1209.

  • [4] Callaghan R. & Herselman M. (2015). Applying a Living Lab methodology to support innovation in education at a university in South Africa. TD The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 11(1) 21–38.

  • [5] Chevalier P. Mačiulytė J. Dedeire M. Prapiestienė R. & Razafimahefa L. (2014). Vietos iniciatyvos ir teritorinis vystymas: LEADER programos įgyvendinimas Lietuvoje ir Prancūzijoje. Geografija 50(2) 76–85. DOI: 10.6001/geografija.v50i2.3004.

  • [6] Choi N. & Majumdar S. (2015). Social Innovation: Towards and a Conceptualisation. In Majumdar S. Guha S. Marakkath N. eds. Technology and Innovation for Social Change (pp. 7–34). New Delhi: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2071-8_2.

  • [7] Darwin S. & Chesbrough H. (2017). Smart farming in Andhr Pradesh India: an open innovative approach [research paper]. Berkeley: University of California.

  • [8] Edwards M. M. & Haines A. (2007). Evaluating smart growth: Implications for small communities. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 27 49–64. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X07305792.

  • [9] Fleischmann K. (2013). Social entrepreneurs and social designers: Change makers with a new mindset? International Journal of Business and Social Science 4(16) 9–17.

  • [10] Glasmeier A. & Christopherson S. (2015). Thinking about Smart Cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society 8 3–12. DOI:10.1093/cjres/rsu034.

  • [11] Guzmán J. G. Del Carpio F. A. Colomo-Palacios R. & De Diego V. M. (2013). Living labs for user-driven innovation: a process reference model. Research-Technology Management 56(3) 29–39. DOI: 10.5437/08956308X5603087.

  • [12] Holmes J. et al. (2017). The Smart Villages Initiative: Findings 20142017. Cambridge: Trinity College.

  • [13] Iždonaitė S. (2012). Kražiai: nykstantys ar atgyjantys? Istorija dabartis perspektyvos. Kaimo raidos kryptys žinių visuomenėje. 3 156–165.

  • [14] Kolbadi N. Mohammadi M. & Namvar F. (2015). Smart Growth Theory as One of the Main Paradigms of Sustainable City. International Journal of Review in Life Sciences. 5(9) 209–219.

  • [15] Marsden T. & Sonnino R. (2008). Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 24 422–431. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.001.

  • [16] Naldi L. Nilsson P. Westlund H. & Wixe S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies 40 90–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006.

  • [17] Orbàn A. (2017). Building Smart Communities in the Hungarian Social Economy. Community Development Journal 52 668–684. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsv053.

  • [18] Patel B. N. & Shah R. (2017). Smart village a case study of Kolavada village. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 4(12) 907–911.

  • [19] Pikturnaitė I. & Paužuolienė J. (2013). Organizacinės kultūros institucionalizavimas Tiltai 4 93–107.

  • [20] Ploeg J. D. Ye J. & Schneider S. (2015). Rural development: actors and practices. Constructing a New Framework for Rural Development Research in Rural Sociology and Development 22 17–30. DOI: 10.1108/S1057-192220150000022001.

  • [21] Robledo J. G. Larios V. M. & Gomez L. (2014). Living Lab for Smart Territory [technical report]. University of Guadalajara. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24925.67047.

  • [22] Sangeetha V. Singh P. Satyapriya Lenin V. Paul S. Sukanya Barua Muralikrishnan L. & Sitaram. (2018). An Agri-Nutri (A2N) Smart Village Model for Food and Nutrition Security. New Delhi: Indian Agricultural Research Institute.

  • [23] Slivinskienė R. (2018). Kaimo vietovės organizacinės kultūros valdymo modelis [Master Thesis]. Akademija: Aleksandro Stulginskio universitetas.

  • [24] Somwanshi R. Shindepatil U. Tule D. Mankar A. & Ingle N. (2016). Study and development of village as a smart village. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 7(6) 395–408.

  • [25] Sumane S. Kunda I. Knickel K. Strauss A. Tisenkopfs T. Des Ios Rios I. Rivera M. Chebach T. & Ashkenazy A. (2017). Local and Farmers’ Knowledge Matters! How Integrating Informal and Formal Knowledge Enhances Sustainable and Resilient. Agriculture Journal of Rural Studies 59 232–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020.

  • [26] Šimanskienė L. & Sandu L. (2013). Organizacinės kultūros vertinimo metodai. Regional Formation and Development Studies 10(2) 201–210. DOI: 10.15181/rfds.v10i2.155.

  • [27] Štareikė E. (2017). The phenomenon of the partnership organisational mechanism in a local action group [Doctoral dissertation]. Akademija: Aleksandro Stulginskio universitetas.

  • [28] Van Gevelt T. Canales Holzeis C. Fennell S. Heap B. Holmes J. Hurley Depret M. Jones B. & Safdar M. T. (2018). Achieving universal energy access and rural development through smart villages. Energy for Sustainable Development 43 139–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.01.005.

  • [29] Wang W. Bryan-Kinns N. & Ji T. (2016). Using Community Engagement to Drive Co-Creation in Rural China. International Journal of Design 10(1) 37–52.

  • [30] Vidickienė D. Gedminaitė-Raudonė Ž. & Vilkė R. (2016). Idealaus poindustrinės gyvenvietės modelio paieškos: ekokaimų atvejis. In 7-oji mokslinė-praktinė konferencija „Lietuvos kaimo vietovių konkurencingumo stiprinimas: geroji patirtis” (pp. 58–62). Akademija: Aleksandro Stulginskio universitetas.

  • [31] Visvizi A. & Lytras M. D. (2018). It’s Not a Fad: Smart Cities and Smart Villages Research in European and Global Contexts. Sustainability 10 2727. DOI: 10.3390/su10082727.

  • [32] Visvizi A. Lytras D. M. & Mudry G. eds. (2019). Smart villages in the EU and beyond. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

  • [33] Vveinhardt J. (2011). Organizacijos kultūros ir organizacinės kultūros charakteristikos Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development. 29(5) 221–230.

  • [34] Wals A. E. J. (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world. Principles perspectives and praxis. Wageningen Academic Publishers. DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-594-9.

  • [35] Zavratnik V. Kos A. & Stojmenova Duh E. (2018). Smart Villages: Comprehensive Review of Initiatives and Practices. Sustainability. 10 2559. DOI:10.3390/su10072559.

  • [36] A Better Life in Rural Areas. Cork 2.0 Declaration (2016). Brussel: European Commission.

  • [37] A Living Countryside. Cork Declaration (1996). Brussel: European Commission.

  • [38] Digital Villages. Germany (2017). Brussel: European Network for Rural Development.

  • [39] EU Action for Smart Villages (2017). Brussel: The European Commission.

  • [40] European Network of Living Labs. Brussel. Available from https://enoll.org/.

  • [41] Guidance for Local Actors on Community-Led Local Development (2018). European Structural and Investment Funds Brussel: European Commission.

  • [42] Matias L. (2018). Smart Rural: Inspiring Innovation in The Rural World. New Innovation Concept. [a presentation]. Available from http://www.reseaupwdr.be/sites/default/files/SmartRural-apresent18_ENG_wallon.compressed.pdf.

  • [43] Smart Countryside study. Finland (2017). Brussel: European Network for Rural Development.

  • [44] Smarter Greener More Inclusive? (2017). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  • [45] Smart Villages. Bled Declaration for a Smarter Future of the Rural Areas in EU.

  • [46] Smart Villages. Revitalising rural services through social and digital innovation (2017). Brussel: European Network for Rural Development.

  • [47] Smart Villages Revitalising Rural Services (2018). Brussel: European Network for Rural Development.

  • [48] Social Innovation in Marginalised Rural Areas (2018). Available from http://www.simrah2020.eu/index.php/2018/02/23/.

  • [49] The Future of Food and Farming. Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament The Council The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions. Brussel: European Commission.

  • [50] The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance (2006). Paris: OECD.

  • [51] Tirziu A. M. & Vrabie C. (2017). Living Labs – Instruments of Social Innovation in Rural Areas. In Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European e|Dem and e|Gov (CEEEGov) Days 2017.

  • [52] Transformimg our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2015). New York: United Nations.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.651

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 138 138 138
PDF Downloads 155 155 155