Information and Communication Infrastructures and New Business Models in Rural Areas: The Case of Molise Region in Italy

Corrado Ievoli 1 , Angelo Belliggiano 2 , Danilo Marandola 3 , Pierluigi Milone 4  und Flaminia Ventura 5
  • 1 Dipartimento Agricoltura Ambiente Alimenti, Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italy
  • 2 Dipartimento Agricoltura Ambiente Alimenti, Università del Molise, Campobasso, Italy
  • 3 Centro Politiche e Bioeconomia, Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, , Roma, Italy
  • 4 Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile ed Ambientale, Università di Perugia, Italy
  • 5 Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile ed Ambientale, Università di Perugia, Italy


The paper deals with the role of ICT and the related infrastructures to induce innovations for sustainable rural development. In particular, it focuses on the innovations induced by ICT in farms and in new rural firms, and on how digital infrastructures support and generate social innovation mechanisms, leading to the consolidation of entrepreneurship and dissemination of ICT-based innovation in rural areas. The hypothesis is that the presence of digital infrastructures generates a double effect: overcoming the concept of geographical proximity (relevant for remote rural areas) and promoting social innovation. In particular, this paper examines the role of social innovation to create a new demand for products, services and organisational models for farms and rural enterprises, promoting further innovation. To target the objectives, the work analyses three case studies of new business models (BMs) based on ICT innovation. The analysis focuses on the most important interactions, learning and organisational processes within the new enterprises and among the new farms/enterprises and the other economic and institutional actors, and on how they were shaped and changed by the use of ICT, relating them to a conceptual model. These three cases, although pioneering, are important since they give an original response to some of the main problems and needs of remote and inner rural areas, as for the access to high value segment of food market, the information deliveries about attractiveness of landscape and countryside for foreigners, investors and tourists and the creation of new stable relation with consumers/citizens in the urban areas. The three cases have been analysed with the aim to identify how the ICT, and the related innovations, create an interconnection between four characteristic elements of the BMs (value creation, supply chain, customer interfaces, financial model) and the restructuring of proximity dimensions (cognitive, institutional, social, geographical, organizational). The work shows how these three cases have several communalities, but also different aspects with respect to our objective of analysis: there are different ways in which the four characteristic elements of the BM are constructed and also different in the role that the different dimensions of proximity play in structuring the innovation process in each one of them. More generally, the results of the work also lead to consider a new role for public investments in ICT infrastructures: public administrations should intervene in order to create a coherence within projects of public and private initiatives.

Falls das inline PDF nicht korrekt dargestellt ist, können Sie das PDF hier herunterladen.

  • [1] Amendola, M. & Bruno, S. (1990). The Behaviour of the Innovative Firm: Relation to the Environment, Research Policy 19(5), 419–433. DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90050-G.

  • [2] Amit, R. & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520. DOI: 10.1002/smj.187.

  • [3] Amit, R. & Zott, C. (2015), Business Models. In Wright, J. D., ed., International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed. Vol. 3 (pp. 33–36). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • [4] Baumol, W. J. & Willig, R. D. (1981). Fixed Costs, Sunk Costs, Entry Barriers, and Sustainability of Monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 96(3), 405–431. DOI: 10.2307/1882680.

  • [5] Becattini, G. (1989). Modelli locali di sviluppo. Bologna: Il Mulino.

  • [6] Benvenuti, B. (1982). Che cos’è l’ambiente tecnologico amministrativo (TATE) che fissa i compiti ed a cosa serve, in I problemi dell’imprenditorialità nella cooperazione agricola. Rome: AIPA.

  • [7] Berglund, H. & Sandström, C. (2013). Business model innovation from an open systems perspective: structural challenges and managerial solutions. International Journal of Product Development 18(3/4), 274–285. DOI: 10.1504/IJPD.2013.055011.

  • [8] Boons, F. & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State of the Art and Steps Towards a Research Agenda, Journal of Cleaner Production 45, 9–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007.

  • [9] Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887.

  • [10] Brunori, G., Rossi, A. & Malandrin, V. (2010). Co-producing Transition: Innovation Processes in Farms Adhering to Solidarity-based Purchase Groups (GAS) in Tuscany, Italy. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 18(1), 28–53.

  • [11] Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers, Long Range Planning 43, 354–363. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010.

  • [12] Cohendet, P. & lerena, P. (1997). Learning, technical change, and public policy: how to create and exploit diversity. In Edquist, C., ed., Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. (pp. 223–241). London: Pinter.

  • [13] Etgar, M. (2008). A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences 36, 97–108. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0061-1.

  • [14] Ferrie, E. A., van Echtelt, F., Wynstra, F., van Weele, A. J. & Duysters, G. (2008). Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a multiple-case study. Journal of Product Innovation Management 25(2), 180–201. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00293.x.

  • [15] Gerritsen, P. R. W. (2002). Diversity at Stake: a farmers’ perspective on biodiversity and conservation in western Mexico, Circle for Rural European Studies, Wageningen University, Wageningen.

  • [16] Holloway, L., Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Cox, R., Dowler, E. & Tuomainen, H. (2007). Possible Food Economies: a Methodological Framework for Exploring Food Production–Consumption Relationships, Sociologia Ruralis, 47(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00427.x.

  • [17] Humphreys, A. & Grayson, K. (2008). The Intersecting Roles of Consumer and Producer: A Critical Perspective on Co-production, Co-creation and Prosumption, Sociology compass 2(3): 963–980. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00112.x.

  • [18] Ievoli, C., Basile, R. & Belliggiano, A. (2017). The Spatial Patterns of Dairy Farming in Molise. European Countryside 9(4), 729–745. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0041.

  • [19] Ievoli, C., Belliggiano, A., Marandola, D., Pistacchio, G. & Romagnoli, L. (2019). Network Contracts in the Italian agri-food industry: determinants and spatial patterns. Food Economy, 21(2) in press.

  • [20] Labianca, M., De Rubertis, S. Belliggiano, A. & Salento, A. (2016). Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence. Studies in Agricultural Economics 118(1), 38–46. DOI: 10.7896/j.1531.

  • [21] Machaj, M. (2013). Sunk Costs and Contestable Markets, The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 16(4), 479–502.

  • [22] Marandola, D., Belliggiano, A., Romagnoli, L. & Ievoli, C. (2019). The spread of no-till in conservation agriculture systems in Italy: indications for rural development policy-making. Agricultural and Food Economics 7(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40100-019-0126-8.

  • [23] Marsden, T. (2010). Mobilizing the regional eco-economy: evolving webs of agri-food and rural development in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3(2, 225–244. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsq010.

  • [24] Meyer, S. B., Coveney, J., Henderson, J., Ward, P. R. & Taylor, A. W. (2012). Reconnecting Australian consumers and producers: Identifying problems of distrust. Food Policy 37, 634–640. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.005.

  • [25] Milone, P. & Ventura, F., eds. (2010). Networking the rural. The future of green regions in Europe. Assen: Van Gorcum.

  • [26] Milone, P. & Ventura, F. (2014). The visible hand in building new markets for rural economies. In: Hebinck, P., Schneider, S. & Ploeg, J. D. van der, eds., Rural Development and the Construction of New Markets (pp. 41–60). London: Routledge.

  • [27] Milone, P. & Ventura, F. (2015). Is Multifunctionality the Road to Empowering Farmers? In Milone, P., Ventura, F. & Ye, J.., eds., Constructing a New Framework for Rural Development (pp. 59–88). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

  • [28] Milone, P. & Ventura, F. (2018). Nested markets: aspetti teorici e applicativi. Culture della Sostenibilità 11, 12–33. DOI: 10.7402/CdS.22.002.

  • [29] Milone, P. & Ventura, F. (2019). New generation farmers: Rediscovering the peasantry, Journal of Rural Studies 65, 43–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.009.

  • [30] Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography 4(1), 3–21. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/4.1.3.

  • [31] Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: National endowment for science, technology and the art.

  • [32] Navarro, F., Labianca, M., Cejudo, E., de Rubertis, S., Salento, A., Maroto, J. C. & Belliggiano, A. (2018). Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period. European Countryside 10(1), 107–126. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0007.

  • [33] Ploeg, J. D. van der (2003). The Virtual Farmer: past, present and future of the Dutch peasantry. Assen: Royal van Gorcum.

  • [34] Ploeg, J. D. van der (2008). The New peasantries. London: Earthscan.

  • [35] Ploeg, J. D. van der (2014). Newly emerging, nested market: a theoretical introduction. In: Hebinck, P., Schneider, S. & Ploeg, J. D. van der, eds., Rural Development and the Construction of New Markets (25 pgs.). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315797519.

  • [36] Ploeg, J. D. van der, Long, A. & Banks, J. (2002). Living Countrysides. Rural development processes in Europe: The state of the art. Doetinchem: Elsevier.

  • [37] Ploeg, J. D. van der, Bouma, J., Rip, A., Rijkenberg, F. H. J., Ventura, F. & Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2004). On Regimes, Novelties and Co-Production. In: Wiskerke, J. S. C. & Ploeg, J. D. van der, eds., Seeds of Transition (pp. 1–30). Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.

  • [38] Ploeg, J. D. van der, Broekhuizen, R. van, Brunori, G., Sonnino, R., Knickel, K. & Oostindie, H. (2008). Towards a Framework for Understanding Regional Rural Development. In van der Ploeg, J. D. & Marsden, T., eds., Unfolding webs, (pp. 1–28). Assen: Van Gorcum.

  • [39] Renting, H. & Ploeg, J. D. van der (2001). Reconnecting Nature, Farming and Society: Environmental Cooperatives in the Netherlands as Institutional Arrangements for Creating Coherence. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 3(2), 85–102. Doi: 10.1002/jepp.75.

  • [40] Roep, D. (2001). Vernieuwend werken; sporen van vermogen en onvermogen (een sociomateriele studie over verniewuing in de landbouw uitgewerkt voor de westelijke veenweidegebieden). Wageningen: Wageningen University.

  • [41] Rossi, A. & Brunori, G. (2010). Drivers of transformation in the agro-food system. GAS as co-production of Alternative Food Networks. In Darnhofer, I. & Grötzer, M., eds., Building sustainable rural futures. The added value of systems approaches in times of change and uncertainty (pp. 1913–1931), Wien: Universität für Bodenkultur.

  • [42] Saccani, N., Johansson, P. & Perona, M. (2007). Configuring the after-sales service supply chain: A multiple case study. International Journal of Production Economics 110(1–2), 52–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.009.

  • [43] Saccomandi, V. (1991). Istitituzioni di economia del mercato dei prodotti agricoli. Roma: REDA editore.

  • [44] Sakellaridis, K. & Stiakakis, E. (2011). Business model change due to ICT integration: an application to the entertainment industry, International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications 3, 1–13.

  • [45] Shaw I., Bell, M., Sinclair, I., Sloper, P., Mitchell, W., Dyson, P., Clayden, J. & Rafferty, J. (2009). An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the integrated children’s system. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 613–626. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp040.

  • [46] Schellberg, J., Hill, M., Gerhards, R., Rothmund, M. & Braun, M. (2008). Precision agriculture on grassland: Applications, perspectives and constraints. European Journal of Agronomy 29, (2–3), 59–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.05.005.

  • [47] Tellis, W. M. (1997). Introduction to Case Study. The Qualitative Report 3(2), 1–14.

  • [48] Veit, D., Clemons, E., Benlian, A., Buxmann, P., Hess, T., Kundisch, D., Leimeister, J. M., Loos, P. & Spann, M. (2014). Business Models – An Information Systems Research Agenda. Business & Information Systems Engineering 6(1), 45–53. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-013-0308-y.

  • [49] Ventura, F., Schiavelli, A. & Milone, P. (2016). Direct Food Roma: Saggine Donzelli.

  • [50] Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study ResearchDesign and Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • [51] Ziemba, E. & Eisenbardt, M. (2015). Prosumers’ participation in business processes, Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management 3(1), 114–127.

  • [52] Zott, C., Amit, R. & Massa, L. (2011). The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research, Journal of Management 37(4), 1019–1042. DOI: 10.1177/0149206311406265.

  • [53] White, S., Wastell, D., Broadhurst, K. & Hall, C. (2010). When policy overleaps itself: The ‘tragic tale’ of the Integrated Children’s System. Critical Social Policy 30(3). DOI: 10.1177/0261018310367675.

  • [54] CELAC (2017). Innovation for Sustainable Rural Development, Santiago de Chile. I7769EN/1/09.17.

  • [55] DIT (Delivery Innovation Team) and Tech4i2 Ltd (2010). A Benefits Framework for Social Inclusion Initiatives, City of London.

  • [56] EUROPEAN UNION (2014). Research and Innovation performance in the EU. Luxembourg: European Union.

  • [58] FAO (2016). Innovative markets for sustainable agriculture – How innovations in market institutions encourage sustainable agriculture in developing countries. Roma: FAO/INRA.

  • [59] OECD (2016), OECD Regional Outlook 2016: Productive Regions for Inclusive Societies, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/9789264260245-en.


Zeitschrift + Hefte