Sysmä Community Currency: An Analysis of its Success from the Perspectives of Purposes, Stakeholders and Promotion

Open access


The article is a case study of a local currency, recently introduced in the rurally situated municipality of Sysmä, Finland. As a small community suffering a gradual population decline since the 1960s, Sysmä municipality has begun to innovate with several projects this millennium. Here, we analyse as a narrative and from the viewpoint of experienced tensions, the introductory phase of one of these projects, which strictly is a hyper-local currency acting as a system of account. It is noted that there are unclarities regarding the purpose of the scheme, and that different stakeholders and other observers do have varying ideas about this purpose. Political decisions over limiting rights of issuance of the local currency to locally registered businesses; and its exclusive use for local association subsidies have created some challenges to the acceptance of the currency. Further, the currency has limited uptake due to technical issues, injudicious use of the marketing mix and difficulties with innovating in a rural area. Noting these issues and the peculiarity of the scheme amidst other typical European local currency schemes, the article also points out benefits of the scheme and potential future developments.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Alassouli H. M. (2018). Internet Earning Through Cryptocurrency Airdrops Bounties Cloud Mining and Investment Websites. Morrisville NC:

  • [2] Albrecht K. & McIntyre L. (2006). The Spychips Threat: Why Christians Should Resist RFID and Electronic Surveillance. Nashville TN: Thomas Nelson Inc. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2339.

  • [3] Aldridge T. J. Patterson A. & Tooke J. (2003). Trading Places: geography and the role of Local Exchange Trading Schemes in local sustainable development. In Buckingham S. & Theobald K. eds. Local Environmental Sustainability (pp. 169–194). Boca Raton FL: Woodhead Publishing in Environmental Management. DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-85573-685-6.50011-6.

  • [4] Almstedt Å. (2013). Post-productivism in rural areas: A contested concept. In Natural Resources and Regional Development Theory (pp. 8–22). Umeå universitet.

  • [5] Arnkil R. Järvensivu A. Koski P. & Piirainen T. (2010). Final Report on Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ project Exploring Quadruple HelixOutlining user-oriented innovation models. Tampere: University of Tampere.

  • [6] Arnstein S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4) 216–224. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225.

  • [7] Basit T. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research 45(2) 143–154. DOI: 10.1080/0013188032000133548.

  • [8] Blanc J. (2011). Classifying “CCs”: Community complementary and local currencies’ types and generations. International Journal of Community Currency Research 15D 4–10. DOI: 10.15133/j.ijccr.2011.013.

  • [9] Blanc J. & Fare M. (2012). Les monnaies sociales en tant que dispositifs innovants: une évaluation. InnovationsRevue d’économie et de management de l’innovation 2(38) 67–84. DOI: 10.3917/inno.038.0067.

  • [10] Brubaker R. (2005). The ‘diaspora’ diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(1) 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/0141987042000289997.

  • [11] Brunnhuber S. (2015). How to Finance our Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Socioecological Quantitative Easing (QE) as a Parallel Currency to Make the World a Better Place. Cadmus 2(5) 112–118.

  • [12] Cartwright A. (2013). Knowing when it is time to go: managing rural decline in Central and Eastern Europe. Pannon Management Review 2(1) 33–48.

  • [13] Champion T. & Hugo G. (2003). Introduction: Moving Beyond the Urban-Rural Dichotomy. In Hugo G. ed. New forms of urbanization: beyond the urban-rural dichotomy. (pp. 3–24). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315248073.

  • [14] Chatterjee B. (2009). Further analysis on sustaining and disruptive technologies. In Finding the Innovation Gap: Disruptive idea a better way of managing prototypes (Chapter 8). Bloomington IN: iUniverse.

  • [15] Christopherson S. Michie J. & Tyler P. (2010). Regional resilience: theoretical and empirical perspectives Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society 3(1) 3–10. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsq004.

  • [16] Cloke P. (1985). Counterurbanisation: a rural perspective. Geography 70(1) 13–23.

  • [17] Cohen B. J. (1998). The Geography of Money. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

  • [18] Conaty P. & Lewis M. (2012). Sweden’s JAK Bank: Liberating Community Finance from the Ball and Chain of Compound Interest. In The Resilience Imperative – Co-operative Transitions to a Steady-state Economy (pp. 51–57). Gabriola Island BC: New Society Publishers.

  • [19] Constant A. F. & Zimmermann K. F. (2016). Diaspora economics: New perspectives. International Journal of Manpower 37(7) 1110–1135. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2830927.

  • [20] Cumming G. S. Barnes G. Perz S. Schmink M. Sieving K. E. Sauthworth J. Binford M. Halt R. D. Stickler C. & van Holt T. (2005). An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems 8(8) 975–987. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z.

  • [21] de Groot A. D. (2014). The meaning of “significance” for different types of research [translated and annotated by Wagenmakers E-J. Borsboom D. Verhagen J. Kievit R. Bakker M. Cramer A. Matzke D. Mellenbergh D. and van der Maas H. L. J.]. Acta Psychologica 148 188–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001.

  • [22] de la Rosa J. L. & Stodder J. (2015). On Velocity in Several Complementary Currencies. International Journal of Community Currency Research 19(D) 114–127. DOI: 10.15133/j.ijccr.2015.012.

  • [23] Dower M. (2013). Rural development in the New Paradigm. In Kolczynski M. ed. The new paradigm in action – on successful partnerships (pp. 30–50). Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development.

  • [24] Eckerberg K. & Forsberg B. (1998). Implementing Agenda 21 in local government: the Swedish experience. Local Environment 3(3) 333–347. DOI: 10.1080/13549839808725569.

  • [25] Eliadis F. P. Hill M. M. & Howlett M. (2005). Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

  • [26] Eriksen T. H. (2001). Exchange and Consumption. In Small Places Large Issues: An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology. 4th ed. pp. 217–240. London: Pluto Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt183p184.

  • [27] Eskelinen T. (2018). Social Space for Self-Organising: An Exploratory Study of Timebanks in Finland and in the UK. Nordic Journal of Social Research 9 89–109. DOI: 10.7577/njsr.2148.

  • [28] Falk A. PHL 2003). Homo Oeconomicus versus Homo Reciprocans: Ansätze für ein neues Wirtschaftspolitisches Leitbild? Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 4(1) 141–172. DOI: 10.1515/1468-2516.t01-1-00011.

  • [29] Fare M. & Ahmed P. O. (2017). Why are complementary currency systems difficult to grasp within conventional economics? Revue Interventions économiques 59 1–20. DOI: 10.4000/interventionseconomiques.3960.

  • [30] Fare M. & Ahmed P. O. (2017b). Complementary Currency Systems and their Ability to Support Economic and Social Changes. Development and Change 48(5) 847–872. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12322.

  • [31] Fieldsend A. F. (2013). Rural Renaissance: an integral component of regional economic resilience. Studies in Agricultural Economics 115(2) 85–91. DOI: 10.7896/j.1225.

  • [32] Fox D. (2008). Property Rights in Money. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • [33] Freeman R. E. (2010). The Stakeholder Concept and Strategic Management. In Freeman R. E. ed. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (pp. 31–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139192675.005.

  • [34] Friedman A. L. & Miles S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • [35] Gelleri C. (2009). Chiemgauer Regiomoney: Theory and Practice of a Local Currency. International Journal of Community Currency Research 13 61–75. DOI: 10.15133/j.ijccr.2009.006.

  • [36] Geertz C. (2000). Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400823406.

  • [37] Giménez A. F. C. & Tamajón L. G. (2019). An Analysis of the Process of Adopting Local Digital Currencies in Support of Sustainable Development. Sustainability 11(3) 849. DOI: 10.3390/su11030849.

  • [38] Gintis H. (2000). Beyond Homo economicus: evidence from experimental economics. Ecological Economics 35(3) 311–322. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00216-0.

  • [39] Godenhjelm S. & Johanson J-E. (2018). The effect of stakeholder inclusion on public sector project innovation. International Review of Administrative Sciences 84(1) 42–62. DOI: 10.1177/0020852315620291.

  • [40] Goodman L. A. (1961). Snowball Sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32(1) 148–170. DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177705148.

  • [41] Gorchakova N. (2012). Conceptualisation of transnational remittances as social capital (re) production. The case of the Somali diaspora in Finland. [Master Thesis]. University of Helsinki.

  • [42] Greco T. (2001). Improving Local Currencies or How To Make a Good Thing Better. In Money: Understanding and Creating Alternatives to Legal Tender (pp. 181–196). White River Junction VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

  • [43] Greco T. (2009). How Complementary Currencies Succeed or Fail. In The End of Money and the Future of Civilization (pp. 144–159). White River Junction VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

  • [44] Greco T. (2012). Reclaiming the credit commons: Towards a butterfly society. In Bolier D. & Helfrich S. eds. The Wealth of the Commons: A World Beyond Market & State pp. 230–5. Amerherst MA: Levellers Press.

  • [45] Greenfield A. (2010). Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. Berkeley CA: Pearson Education.

  • [46] Grüne-Yanoff T. (2012). Paradoxes of Rational Choice Theory. In Roeser S. Hillerbrand R. Sandin P. & Peterson M. eds. Handbook of Risk Theory (pp. 499–516). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_19.

  • [47] Grunfelder J. Rispling L. & Norlén G. (2018). State of the Nordic Region 2018. Stockholm: NORDREGIO. DOI: 10.6027/nord2018-001.

  • [48] Gubrium J. F. Holstein J. A. Marvasti A. B. & McKinney K. D. et al. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781452218403.

  • [49] Haas R. Meixner O. & Petz M. (2016). Enabling community-powered co-innovation by connecting rural stakeholders with global knowledge brokers – A case study from Nepal. British Food Journal 118(6) 1350–1369. DOI: 10.1108/bfj-10-2015-0398.

  • [50] Halhead V. (2006). Rural Movements in Europe: Scandinavia and the Accession States. Social Policy and Administration 40(6) 596–611. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00522.x.

  • [51] Hahl T. Lintukangas E. & Aarrevaara E. (2014). Sysmän taajaman muutos 1970-luvulta nykypäivään. Lahti: Lahden ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisu.

  • [52] Hayashi M. (2012). Japan’s Fureai Kippu Time-banking in Elderly Care: Origins Development Challenges and Impact. International Journal of Community Currency Research 16 30–44. DOI: 10.15133/j.ijccr.2012.003.

  • [53] Heikkilä E. (2003). Differential urbanisation in Finland. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 94(1) 49–63. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9663.00236.

  • [54] Heiler F. (2008). Wie kommt das Neue ins Land? Nachhaltige Raum- und Gesellschaftsentwicklung als Gegenstand der Emergenz- und Innovationsforschung. Generierung profunder Innovation in ländlichen Kommunen [PhD Thesis] Vienna: University of Life Sciences and Natural Resource Management.

  • [55] Hennink M. M. (2013). Introducing Focus Group Discussions. In Focus Group Discussions (pp. 1–34). New York NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199856169.003.0001.

  • [56] Hileman G. (2014). From Bitcoin to the Brixton Pound: History and Prospects for Alternative Currencies (Poster Abstract). In Böhme R. Brenner M. Moore T. & Smith M. eds. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security 2014 Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 8438 (pp. 163–165). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44774-1_13.

  • [57] Hemmati M. (2002). Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict. Abingdon: Earthscan. DOI: 10.4324/9781849772037.

  • [58] Hornborg A. (2009). Zero-sum world challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50(3–4) 237–262. DOI: 10.1177/0020715209105141.

  • [59] Kennedy M. (2012). Occupy money: Creating an economy where everybody wins. Gabriola Island BC: New Society Publishers.

  • [60] Kennedy M. Lietaer B. A. & Rogers J. (2012). People money: The promise of regional currencies. Charmouth: Triarchy Press Limited.

  • [61] Koenig A. (2017). Liverpool Local Pound. In Koenig A. ed. Cryptocoins: Investieren in digitale Währungen (pp. 122–4). München: FinanzBuch Verlag.

  • [62] Kotilainen J. Eisto I. & Vatanen E. (2015). Uncovering mechanisms for resilience: Strategies to counter shrinkage in a peripheral city in Finland. European Planning Studies 23(1) 53–68. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.820086.

  • [63] Kryachkov N. (2014). Аксиоматика политической экономии без процента. St. Petersburg: ЮПИ. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.2912.3361.

  • [64] Laamanen M. Wahlen S. & Campana M. (2015). Mobilising collaborative consumption lifestyles: a comparative frame analysis of time banking. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39(5) 459–467. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12190.

  • [65] Lake O. O. (2010). Uprisings for the Earth: Reconnecting Culture with Nature. Ashland OR: White Cloud Press.

  • [66] Latour B. (1996). On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Soziale Welt 47(4) 369–381.

  • [67] Lee R. (1996). Moral Money? LETS and the Social Construction of Local Economic Geographies in Southeast England. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 28(8) 1377–1394. DOI: 10.1068/a281377.

  • [68] Lee R. Leyshon A. Aldridge T. Tooke J. Williams C. & Thrift N. (2004). Making Geographies and Histories? Constructing Local Circuits of Value. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22(4) 595–617. DOI: 10.1068/d50j.

  • [69] Leydesdorff L. (2012). The Triple Helix Quadruple Helix … and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1) 25–35. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4.

  • [70] Libery B. & Kneafsey M. (1998). Product and Place: Promoting Quality Products and Services in the Lagging Rural Regions of the European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies 5(4) 329–341. DOI: 10.1177/096977649800500404.

  • [71] Liebowitz S. J. & Margolis S. E. (1999). Path Dependence. In Bouckaert B. & De Geest G. eds. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics: The History and Methodology of Law and Economics (pp. 981–998). Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.

  • [72] Lietaer B. (2001). The Future of Money. London: Random House.

  • [73] Lietaer B. & Dunne J. (2013). Rethinking Money: How New Currencies Turn Scarcity into Prosperity. San Francisco CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

  • [74] Ludvig A. Weiss G. Sarkki S. Nijnik M. & Živojinović I. (2018). Mapping European and forest related policies supporting social innovation for rural settings. Forest Policy and Economics 97 146–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.015.

  • [75] Madison D. S. (2010). Introduction. In Madison D. S. ed. Acts of Activism: Human Rights as Radical Performance (pp. 1–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511675973.001.

  • [76] Martignoni J. (2012). A new approach to a typology of complementary currencies. International Journal of Community Currency Research 16(A) 1–17. DOI: 10.15133/j.ijccr.2012.001.

  • [77] Melo P. & Jorge L. (2015). Quantitative support for UX methods identification: how can multiple criteria decision making help? Universal Access in the Information Society 14(215) 215–229. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-013-0341-0.

  • [78] Miller G. & Dingwall R. (1997). Context and Method in Qualitative Research. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781849208758.

  • [79] Ngugi B. Pelowski M. & Ogembo J. G. (2010). M-Pesa: A case study of the critical early adopters’ role in the rapid adoption of mobile money banking in Kenya. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 43(3) 1–16. DOI: j.1681-4835.2010.tb00307.x.

  • [80] Nishibe M. (2018). Understanding the diversity of CCs world-wide in globalization and deindustrialization as an evolutionary tree diagram. International Journal of Community Currency Research 22 13–36. DOI: 10.15133/j.ijccr.2018.003.

  • [81] North D. & Smallbone D. (2006). Developing entrepreneurship and enterprise in Europe’s peripheral rural areas: Some issues facing policy-makers. European Planning Studies 14(1) 41–60. DOI: 10.1080/09654310500339125.

  • [82] North P. (2005). Scaling alternative economic practices? Some lessons from alternative currencies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30(2) 221–233. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00162.x.

  • [83] Nechyba T. J. (2016). Different Types of Tastes. Utility-Maximizing Choice: Consumers Workers and Savers. In Nechyba T. J. ed. Microeconomics: An Intuitive Approach with Calculus (pp. 113–142). Boston MA: Cengage Learning.

  • [84] Obst P. Zinkiewicz L. & Smith S. G. (2002). Sense of community in science fiction fandom Part 1: Understanding sense of community in an international community of interest. Journal of Community Psychology 30(1) 87–103. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.1052.

  • [85] Ostrom E. (2007). Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In Sabatier P. ed. Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 21–64). Cambridge MA: Westview Press.

  • [86] Paterson A. G. (2010). A Buzz between Rural Cooperation and the Online Swarm. Affinities 4(1) 83–109.

  • [87] Pattison G. (2004). Planning for decline: the ‘D’-village policy of County Durham UK. Planning Perspectives 19(3) 311–332. DOI: 10.1080/02665430410001709804.

  • [88] Petz M. (2017). Learning in Indigenous Mountain Forest Communities. Case studies in Northern Thailand: White Hmong (Miao) Sheleh Ladhulsi (Lahu) and Pgak’nyau (Karen) Peoples [Master Thesis]. Vienna: The University of Life Sciences and Natural Resource Management. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34209.86888.

  • [89] Pleschberger W. (2003). Cities and municipalities in the Austrian political system since the 1990s. New developments between “efficiency” and “democracy”. In Kersting N. & Vetter A. eds. Reforming Local Government in Europe (pp. 113–135). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-11258-7_6.

  • [90] Ponterotto J. G. (2006). Brief note on the origins evolution and meaning of the qualitative research concept thick description. The Qualitative Report 11(3) 538–549.

  • [91] Ram S. & Sheth J. N. (1989). Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and its solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing 6(2) 5–14. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000002542.

  • [92] Rogers E. M. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations 4th ed. New York NY: Simon and Schuster.

  • [93] Roots L. & Dumbrava C. (2016). E-Citizenship Opportunities in the Changing Technological Environment. In Kerikmäe T. & Rull A. eds. The Future of Law and eTechnologies (pp. 45–56). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_3.

  • [94] Sachy M. (2017). Money for the Common Wealth of the Multitude: Toward a User-Managed Currency and Payment System Design [PhD Thesis]. The University of Leicester.

  • [95] Sampson K. A. & Goodrich C. G. (2009). Making Place: Identity Construction and Community Formation through “Sense of Place” in Westland New Zealand. Society and Natural Resources 22 901–915. DOI: 10.1080/08941920802178172.

  • [96] Samuelson P. A. (1997). Exchange Division of Labor and Money. In Samuelson P. A. ed. Economics: The Original 1948 edition (pp. 51–59). New York NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

  • [97] Schneider W. E. (1994). The Reengineering Alternative: A plan for making your current culture work. New York NY: McGraw Hill.

  • [98] Schultz D. E. Tannenbaum S. I. & Lauterborn R. F. (1993). A History of Integrated Marketing Communications: Why Is It Important Now? In Schultz D. E. Tannenbaum S. I. & Lauterborn R. F. eds. The new marketing paradigm: Integrated marketing communications (pp. 1–14). Chicago: NTC Business Books.

  • [99] Seaton A. V. (1999). Book towns as tourism developments in peripheral areas. International Journal of Tourism Research 1(5) 389–399. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-1970(199909/10)1:5<389::aid-jtr204>;2-0.

  • [100] Skeldon R. (1997). Rural-to-urban migration and its implications for poverty alleviation. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 12(1) 3–16. DOI: 10.18356/cd2c964e-en.

  • [101] Stingl AI. (2015). The Rural Imaginary: Integrated Interdisciplinarity in the Study of the Political Bioeconomy. In Bakker JI ed. The Methodology of Political Economy: Studying the Global Rural–Urban Matrix (pp. 167–190). London: Lexington Books.

  • [102] Taylor S. Bogdan R. & DeVault M. (2016). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource 4th ed. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.

  • [103] Valek L. & Bures V. (2019). Time Bank as a Complementary Economic System: Emerging Research and Opportunities. Hershey PA: IGI Global.

  • [104] van Meeteren M. & Poorthuis A. (2018). Christaller and “big data”: recalibrating central place theory via the geoweb. Urban Geography 39(1) 122–148. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2017.1298017.

  • [105] Varoufakis Y. (2016). And the Weak Suffer What They Must? Europe Austerity and the Threat to Global Stability. London: Random House.

  • [106] Vauramo T. E. Rante S. Taegen J. & Verma I. (2018). Sote-palvelut muuttuvat uudistuksesta huolimatta. Aalto university.

  • [107] Walsh A. (2009). Quick response codes and libraries. Library Hi Tech News 26(5/6) 7–9. DOI: 10.1108/07419050910985255.

  • [108] Weber M. (1978). The City (Non-Legitimate Domination) translation of German published 1922. In Roth G. & Wittich C. eds. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (pp. 1212–1372). Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

  • [109] Wolman D. (2013). The End of Money: Counterfeiters Preachers Techies Dreamersand the Coming Cashless Society. Philidelphia PA: Da Capo Press.

  • [110] Zenker S. & Braun E. (2010). The place brand centre – A conceptual approach for the brand management of places. In Beckmann S. Ringberg C. & Ritter T. eds. 39th European Marketing Academy Conference (pp. 1–8). Copenhagen: Denmark Copenhagen Business School.

  • [111] Arvotakomo (2019). Valuecraft > About. Available from:

  • [112] European Union (2004). Annex I list referred to in article III-226 of the constitution i.e. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union here defining Agricultural products. Official Journal of the European Union.

  • [113] K-rhymä (2017). Näin otat K-Plussan mobiilikortin käyttöön. Available from:

  • [114] Kesko (2016). K-Plussa in English. Available from:

  • [115] Kesko (2019). K-Plussa-mobiilikortti. Available from:

  • [116] Kintetsu Group (2018). KIPSトップページ >「近鉄ハルカスコイン」社会実験概要 > 詳 細 > よくあるご質問. (Translates as: KIPS top page > Outline of “Kintetsu Harukas coin” social experiment > Details > FAQ). Available from:

  • [117] Lahti Region Ltd. (2017). Webpage image with text. Available from:

  • [118] Levy H. What’s New in Gartner’s Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies (2015). (Stamford CT: Gartner Inc.). Available from: Archived at

  • [119] Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö (2013). Local food – but of course!: Government Programme on Local Food and development objectives for the local food sector to 2020. Helsinki: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.

  • [120] Manelius T. Legislation on regional development. (Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö / Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland). Available from:

  • [121] David McCarthy D. and Reidelbach M. (2016). Keep it Local! Grassroots Economic Organizing (GEO). Available from:

  • [122] MMM (1964). Mitä Missä Milloin 1964: Kansalaisen Vuosikirja. Helsinki: Otava Oy.

  • [123] MLIT (2017). Country Report: Finland. Tokyo: National Spatial Planning and Regional policy Bureau Japanese Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism.

  • [124] OSF (2018). Sysmä Preliminary population by Area Month and Sex. ISSN=1797-5395. Official Statistics of Finland interface service (Helsinki: Statistics Finland). Available from:

  • [125] OSF (2019). Dwellings and housing conditions. ISSN=1798-6761. Official Statistics of Finland interface service (Helsinki: Statistics Finland). Available from:

  • [126] PHL (2017). Maakuntahallitus minutes 14.08.2017 107 Alueelliset innovaatiot ja kokeilut rahoituksen myöntäminen hankkeelle Sysmän kuponkieuro ja pienyrittäjien verkosto (Lahti: Päijät-Hämeen liitto). 14.08.2017. Available from:

  • [127] PHL (2019). Kuponkieuro ja Pienyritysten Verkosto Loppuraportti. No author given but most probably Nieminen J. (Project Manager in Sysmä) as he is listed in the word document metadata as the author. (Lahti: Päijät-Hämeen liitto).

  • [128] Saarinen U-M. (2011). Suomessa väki keskittyy taajamiin. (Helsinki: Statistics Finland). Available from:

  • [129] Simola M. (2017). LIITE 1: HANKESUUNNITELMA: hankkeen tavoitteet konkreettiset toimenpiteet ja Vaikutukset: Sysmän kuponkieuro ja pienyrittäjien verkosto Ketterät kokeiluhankkeet. Available from:

  • [130] S Group (2019). S Group’s Annual and Responsibility Report 2018. (Helsinki: S Group). Available from:

  • [131] SF (2019). 185 – Media equipment use those aged 10 or over (2002 / 2017) %. Statistics Finland’s PxWeb databases (Helsinki: Statistics Finland). Available from:

  • [132] Spotless (2017). Spotless service design agency. When and How to Use Ethnographic Research. San Francisco: Medium. Available from:

  • [133] Talasterä J. and Sources YLE. (2017). Southern Finland micro-municipality to trial independent currency in 2018. YLE Uutiset. Helsinki: YLE.

  • [134] The Lewes Pound The Lewes Pound. Lewes: The Lewes Pound. Available from:

  • [135] Triple Helix Research Group The Triple Helix concept. Stanford CA: Stanford University. Available from:

  • [136] Tuomikoski M. (2018). Pikkukunnalta rohkea päänavaus: Sysmä ottaa käyttöön kaikille suomalaisille avoimen e-kuntalaisuuden. YLE Uutiset. Helsinki: YLE. Available from

  • [137] Vanhanen J. (2015). A film called Aikamatka Sysmän Historiaan (Translation: Timetravel into Sysmän History) Finland.

  • [138] Waldviertler – Verein für regionales Wirtschaften (2016). 2. Sondernewsletter. Heidenreichstein: Waldviertler - Verein für regionales Wirtschaften. Available from:

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.651

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 211 211 63
PDF Downloads 164 164 65