Effects of Social Economy Selected Segments in The Slovak Republic

Open access


The exclusion of individuals from the labour market directly affects the economic situation of their households. The main objective of the social economy is to address this situation. With the development of the social economy, efforts to assess its effects are intensified. The ambition of the paper is to express the extent of social economy in terms of rurality of regions of the Slovak Republic, identify its actors, sectors, where its entities operate and to illustrate both direct and indirect effects of the social economy. Industrial production is the most attractive sector for Slovak social enterprises. A small proportion of social enterprises operate in information, communication services and education. The largest number of sheltered workshops and workplaces operates in wholesale and retail trade and services related to sales. Geographical distribution of the social economy entities in Slovak districts (LAU 1) showed dependence of social economy intensity on rurality. Impact of a social enterprise is strongest in the local territory. However, single social enterprise can bring wide regional, national and even supranational effects.

[1] Bornstein, D. & Davis, S. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship. What Everyone Needs To Know. Oxford University Press.

[2] Defourny, J. (2001). From Third Sector to Social Enterprise. In Borzaga, C., Defourny, J., eds., The Emergence of Social Enterprise (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.

[3] Defourney, J., Nyssens, M. (2010). Conception of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergence and Divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53. DOI: 10.1080/19420670903442053.

[4] Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review 36(2), 90–100. DOI: 10.2307/41165746.

[5] Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone: John Wiley.

[6] Fáziková, M. & Stehlíková, B. (2006). Nové prístupy ku klasifikácii vidieckych regiónov. Ekonomika poľnohospodárstva, 6(2), 23–31.

[7] Gillis, W. & James, M. S. L. (2015). The Impact of the Triple Bottom Line on Social Entrepreneurship. In The Fifth International Conference on Engaged Management Scholarship (not paged). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2676325.

[8] Gross, R. (2015). Measuring Organizational Performance: A New Approach To Triple Bottom Line Reporting And Stakeholder Engagement. British Journal of Business and Management Research. 2(1), 69–80.

[9] Henriques, A., Richardson, J., eds. (2004). The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up? Abingdon-on-Thames: Taylor & Francis.

[10] Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment. 18(3), 177–191. DOI: 10.1002/bse.564.

[11] Janek, M. (2017). The Social Economy in Slovakia [bachelor thesis]. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture.

[12] Kerlin, J. A. (2012). Defining Social Enterprise Across Different Contexts: Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(1), 84–108. DOI: 10.1177/0899764011433040.

[13] Korimová, G. (2007). Predpoklady rozvoja sociálnej ekonomiky. Banská Bystrica: Univerzita Mateja Bela.

[14] Korimová, G. (2014). Sociálna ekonomika a podnikanie. Banská Bystrica: Belianum.

[15] Lehtonen, O. & Tykkyläinen, M. (2014). Potential Job Creation and Resource Dependance in Rural Finland. European Countryside 6(3), 202–224. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2014-0011.

[16] Lenčéšová, L. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and its effects – case study of Spišský Hrhov [diploma thesis]. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture.

[17] Lubelcová, G. (2012). Sociálna ekonomika: koncepty, príležitosti, riziká. Sociológia. 44(1), 62–82.

[18] Lundgaard-Andersen, L., Gawell, M. & Spear, R., eds. (2017). Social Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprises – Nordic Perspectives. London: Routledge.

[19] Magee, L., Scerri, A., James, P., Thom, J. A., Padgham, L., Hickmott, S. & Cahill, F. (2013). Reframing social sustainability reporting: towards an engaged approach. Environment, development and sustainability, 15(1), 225–243. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2.

[20] Novotný, L., Csachová, S., Kulla, M., Nestorová-Dická, J. & Pregi, L. (2016). Development Trajectories of Small Towns in East Slovakia. European Countryside. 8(4), 373–394. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0026.

[21] Reeder, N., O’ Sullivan, C., Tucker, S., Ramsden, P. & Mulgan, G. (2012). Strengthening social innovation in Europe: journey to effective assessment and metrics. Brussels: European Commission. DOI: 10.2769/53098.

[22] Schumpeter, J. A. (1949). Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In Wohl, R. R., ed., Change and the entrepreneur: postulates and the patterns for entrepreneurial history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[23] Slaper, T. F. & Hall, T. J. (2011). The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? Indiana Business Review 86(1), 4–8.

[24] Tapio, R., Havukainen, I. & Kuittinen, V. (2014). Common Power – Social Enterprise and Renewable Energy. Joensuu: Karelia University of Applied Sciences.

[25] Yongvanich, K. & Guthrie, J. (2006). An extended performance reporting framework for social and environmental accounting. Business Strategy and the Environment 15(5), 309–321. DOI: 10.1002/bse.541.

[26] Yunus, M. (2010). Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism that Serves Humanity’s Most Pressing Needs. New York: Public Affairs.

[27] Act No. 5/2004 of the Slovak Republic on Employment Services and on amendments to certain acts of 4 December 2003. Available at: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravnepredpisy/SK/ZZ/2004/5/20170501.

[28] Act No. 112/2018 of the Slovak Republic on Social Economy and Social Enterprises and on amendments to certain acts of 13 March 2018. Available at: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravnepredpisy/SK/ZZ/2018/112/20180501.html.

[29] Chreneková, M. & Billik, T. (2017). Social economy in the renewable energy sector. International Scientific Conference. Fast-growing Trees and Plants Growing for Energy Purposes. September 7–8th 2017 [poster]. Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra.

[30] European Commission (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Social Business Initiative creating a favourable climate for social enterprises, key stakeholders in the social economy and innovation. SEC (2011) 1278 final. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0682&from=EN.

[31] European Commission. (2015). A Map of Social Enterprises and Their Eco-systems in Europe – country reports. Online. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/social/keyDocuments.jsp?advSearchKey=socentcntryrepts&mode=advancedSubmit&langId=en&policyArea=&type=0&country=0&year=0&orderBy=docOrder.

[32] Venclík, M. et al. (2016). Sociální podnikání v praxi. Brno: Komora sociálních podniků.

[33] European Commission (2016). Social enterprises and the social economy going forward. A call for action from the Commission Expert Group on Social Entrepreneurship (GECES) European Union. Online. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=9024.

[34] European Commission (2017). Social enterprises and the social economy going forward. Expert Group on Social Entrepreneurship (GECES). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/social-economy/enterprises/expert-groups_en.

[35] OECD (2016). Boosting social entrepreneurship and social enterprise creation http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Czech%20Republic%20Report%20%2006.03.17-FINAL.pdf.

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.607


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 68 68 42
PDF Downloads 93 93 33