Green Infrastructure as A Facilitator of Sustainable Spatial Development in Rural Areas: Experiences from The Vipava Valley (Slovenia)

Open access

Abstract

Although the green infrastructure concept should be implemented in both urban and rural areas, only few studies investigate the green infrastructure concept in the rural settings. This paper contributes to the relevant discussion by analysing how green infrastructure can serve as a facilitator to sustainable spatial development in the predominantly rural area and at the regional level based on the planning experiences from the Vipava Valley (Vipavska dolina), Slovenia. The Vipava Approach is a bottom-up approach that understands green infrastructure in the broader developmental context and not only as a protection or land-use planning. Planning green infrastructure in rural areas should have characteristics of participatory planning on the local level, but it needs to take into account other territorial dimensions of planning as well. It needs to be holistic by addressing key developmental problems on the basis of a strategic development document.

[1] Ahern, J. (2013). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology 28 (6), 1203–1212. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z.

[2] Allen III, W. L. (2012). Advancing Green Infrastructure at All Scales: From Landscape to Site. Environmental Practice 14, 17–25. DOI: 10.1017/S1466046611000469.

[3] Amundsen, O. M., Allen, W. & Hoellen, K. (2009). Green Infrastructure Planning: Recent Advances and Applications. Washington: American Planning Association.

[4] Andersson, K., Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Axelsson, R. & Degerman, E. (2013). Green infrastructures and intensive forestry: Need and opportunity for spatial planning in a Swedish rural-urban gradient. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 28(2), 143–165. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2012.723740.

[5] Benedict, M. A. & McMahon, E. T. (2002). Green infrastructure smart conservation for the 21st century. Renewable Resources Journal 20(3), 12–17.

[6] Bokal, G., Goljevšček, A., Halilović, N., Kožar, T., Kresnik, K., Pečan, P., Sekereš, S. & Vehovec, M. (2017a). Pristop k načrtovanju zelene infrastructure na lokalni ravni: primer občine Miren-Kostanjevica. Urbani izziv, 28(1), 123–131.

[7] Bokal, G., Goljevšček, A., Halilović, N., Kožar T., Kresnik, K., Pečan, P., Sekereš, S. & Vehovec, M. (2017b). Nazaj k naravi, naprej k Vipavi: Načrtovanje in pilotni ukrepi zelene infrastrukture ob reki Vipavi v občini Miren-Kostanjevica (ZelnViM) [Research report]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani.

[8] Bricelj, M., Pavlin, B., Pečar, J., Kušar, S. & Draksler, A. (2015). Strokovne zasnove ureditve vodnega in obvodnega prostora ob reki Vipavi na območju občine Miren-Kostanjevica. Miren: Alumni klub geografov Univerze v Ljubljani, Občina Miren-Kostanjevica, Komisija za hidrogeografijo Zveze geografov Slovenije.

[9] Bulc, G., Ameršek, I. & Dovjak, M. (2014). Green infrastructure in settlements and cities of the future – two cases studies: green roof and treatment wetland. International Journal of Sanitary Engineering Research, Special edition, 67–80.

[10] Črv, R. & Turk, M. (2012). Melioracije in pomen vetrozaščitnih pasov v Vipavski dolini. URL: http://giam2.zrc-sazu.si/sites/default/files/crv_turk_melioracije_vipavska_dolina.pdf.

[11] Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., Yamelynets, T., Dawson, L., Gebrehiwot, M., Stryamets, N., Johansson, K-E., Garrido, P., Naumov, V. & Manton, M. (2017). A bottom-up approach to map land covers as potential green infrastructure hubs for human well-being in rural settings: A case study from Sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning, 168, 72–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.031.

[12] Gabrijelčič, Z., Ušaj, H., Kodrič, I., Poženel, A., Gorkič, M. & Osmuk, N. (1996). Vipavska dolina včeraj, danes, jutri. In Urejenost voda – osnova ali omejitev (pp. 85–98). Maribor: Vodnogospodarski biro Maribor.

[13] De Groot, R. S., Alkmende, R., Braat, L., Hein, L. & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7, 260–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10-0006.

[14] Kambites, C. & Owen, S. (2006). Renewed prospects for green infrastructure planning in the UK. Planning Practice and Research 21(4), 483–496. DOI: 10.1080/02697450601173413.

[15] Kladnik, D. & Natek, M. (2001). Vipavska dolina. In Perko, D. & Orožen Adamič, M., eds., Slovenija: pokrajine in ljudje (pp. 222–233). Ljubljana: Založba Mladinska knjiga.

[16] Kolcsár, R. A. & Szilassi, P. (2018). Assessing accessibility of urban green spaces based on isochrone maps and street resolution population data through the example of Zalaegerszeg, Hungary. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 13(1), 31–36. DOI:10.26471/cjees/2018/013/003.

[17] Lafortezza, R., Davies, C., Sanesi, G. & Konijnendijk, C. C. (2013). Green Infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions. iForest 6, 102–108. DOI: 10.3832/ifor0723-006.

[18] Lerner, J. & Allen, W, L. (2012). Landscape-scale green infrastructure investments as a climate adaptation strategy: a case example for the Midwest United States. Environmental Practice 14(1), 45–56. DOI: 10.1017/S146604661100055X.

[19] Mell, I. C. (2010). Green Infrastructure: concepts, perceptions and its use in spatial planning. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University.

[20] Mell, I. C. (2013). Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail? Examining the “green” of green infrastructure development. Local environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 18(2), 37–41. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2012.719019.

[21] Mell, I. (2015). Green infrastructure planning: policy and objectives. In Sinnett, D., Smith, N. & Burgess, S., eds., Handbook of Green Infrastructure: Planning, Design and Implementation (pp. 105–123). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

[22] Nastran, M. & Železnikar, Š. (2016). Invasive alien plant species on urban green areas. In Jurc, M. & Borkovič, D., eds., Invasive alien species in forests and their impact on the sustainable use of forest resources (pp. 243–251). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.

[23] Naumann, S., Davis, McK., Kaphengest, T., Pieterse, M. & Rayment, M. (2011). Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects [Final report to European Commission]. Brussels: DG.

[24] Oteros-Rozas, E., Martín-López, B., González, J., Plieninger, T., López, C. & Montes, C. (2014). Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance socialecological network. Regional Environmental Change 14, 1269–1289. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-013-0571-y.

[25] Penko Seidl., N., Bončina, A. & Pintar, M. (2017). Strokovna podpora fokusnim skupinam v sklopu priprave Strategije prostorskega razvoja Slovenije 2030: Podeželje in Zelena infrastruktura. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani.

[26] Scholte, S., Teeffelen, A. & Verburg, P. (2015). Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods. Ecological Economics 114, 67–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007.

[27] Štangelj, T. & Poljšak Klaus, P. (2016). Pogledi domačinov na prihodnji razvoj ob reki Vipavi. In Kušar, S., ed., Pogledi na trajnostni razvoj or reki Vipavi v občini Miren-Kostanjevica (pp. 2–5). Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani.

[28] Villamor, G., Palomo, I., Santiago, C., Oteros-Rozas, E. & Hill, J. (2014). Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions and values towards social-ecological systems using participatory methods. Ecological Processes 3, 1–12. DOI: 10.1186/s13717-014-0022-9.

[29] Železnikar, Š., Eler, K. & Pintar, M. (2017). City hotspot: linkages between ecosystem services and biodiversity of urban green areas. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 109(1), 111–123. DOI: 10.14720/aas.2017.109.1.11.

[30] Wright, H. (2011). Understanding green infrastructure: the development of a contested concept in England. Local environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 16(10), 37–41. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2011.631993.

[31] European Commission (2013). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Green infrastructure (GI): Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. Brussels: European Commission.

[32] European Environment Agency (2011). Green Infrastructure and Territorial Cohesion: The concept of Green Infrastructure and Its Integration into Policies Using Monitoring Systems. Brussels: European Environment agency.

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.607

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 94 94 61
PDF Downloads 101 101 51