The (MIS)Compliance of Objectives of New Cap – Legislative, Academic and General Public Perspectives

Eva Daniela Cvik 1  and Radka Macgregor Pelikánová 2
  • 1 Department of Law, Faculty of Economics and Management, 165 00, Praha 6, Czechia
  • 2 Metropolitan University Praha, 100 31, Praha 10, Czechia


For over 50 years, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has been fundamental for European integration, while taking up to 40% of the budget. The new CAP uses various funds and aims at both agricultural production support and rural development. This dichotomy is confirmed by the Treaty on functioning of the EU and developed by various Regulations and Directives. However, are the stated and implied objectives of the primary and secondary EU law under the auspices of the strategy Europe 2020 in compliance? A pioneering holistic Meta-Analysis of the legislative setting, academic treatises and general public perceptions reveals an unexpected byzantine mosaic of expressed and implied objectives, which are hardly to be reconciled. This threat to the new CAP needs to be addressed. Smart, sustainable and inclusive growth demands a reconciliation of efforts and objectives and cannot afford their fragmentation and anti-polarity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Areeda, Ph.E. (1996). The Socratic Method. Harvard Law Review, 109(5): 911–922.

  • [2] Balcerzak, A. P. (2016a). Technological Potential of European Economy. Proposition of Measurement with Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Montenegrin Journal of Economics 12(3), 7–17. DOI: 10.14254/1800-5845.2016/12-3/1.

  • [3] Balcerzak, A. P. (2016b). Fiscal Burden in the European Union Member States. Economic AnnalsXXI, 161(9–10), 4–6. DOI: 10.21003/ea.V161-01.

  • [4] Balcerzak, A. P. (2015). Europe 2020 Strategy and Structural Diversity Between Old and New Member States. Application of Zero Unitarization Method for Dynamic Analysis in the Years 2004–2013. Economics & Sociology, 8(2): 190–210. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-2/14.

  • [5] Bielza, Díaz-Caneja, M., Conte, C., Dittmann, C., Gallego Pinilla, F., Stroblmair, J. & Catenaro, R. (2009). Risk Management and Agricultural Insurance Schemes in Europe. [JRC Reference Reports]. Luxembourg: Publication Office of EU. DOI: 10.2788/24307.

  • [6] Blacksell, M. (2010). Agriculture and landscape in 21st century Europe: The post-communist transition. European Countryside, 2(1): 13–24. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-010-0002-8.

  • [7] Bočková, N. (2015). R&D tax incentives in Czech enterprise. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D 21(1), 5–16.

  • [8] Cacchiarelli, L., Russo, C. & Sorrentino, A. (2018). Market power and bargaining power in the EU food supply chain. NewMedit 17(4). DOI: 10.30682/nm1804b.

  • [9] Cvik, E. D. & MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2016). A comparative study of the legal liability of executives in LLC in the Czech Republic & some of other EU member states. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D 23(1), 54–65.

  • [10] Czyżewski, B., Polcyn, J. & Hnatyszyn-Dzikowska, A. (2016). Concept for Measuring the Efficiency of Public Goods Provision Based on the Education Sector in Poland. Ekonomický časopis, 64(10): 973–993.

  • [11] Dušek, J. (2017). Evaluation of development of cooperation in South Bohemian municipalities in the years 2007–2014. European Countryside 9(2), 342–358. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0021.

  • [12] Fusco, G., Miglietta, P. P. & Porrini, D. (2018). How Drought Affects Agricultural Insurance Policies: The Case of Italy. Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(2), 1–13. DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v11n2p1.

  • [13] Greer, A. (2017). Post-exceptional politics in agriculture: an examination of the 2013 CAP reform. Journal of European Public Policy 24(11), 1585–1603. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1334080.

  • [14] Helming, J. & Tabeau, A. (2017). The economic, environmental and agricultural land use effects in the European Union of agricultural labour subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy. Regional Environmental Change 18(3), 763–773. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-016-1095-z.

  • [15] Hill, B. (2012). Farm incomes, wealth and agricultural policy – filing the CAP´s core information gap, 4th ed. Wallingford: CAB International.

  • [16] Kabrda, J. & Jančák, V. (2006). České zemědělství a krajina po vstupu Česka do EU: nový instiutucionální rámec. In Kraft, S., Mičková, K., Rypl, J., Švec, P. & Vančura, M., eds., Česká geografie v evropském prostoru (pp. 104–112). České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita.

  • [17] Král, M., Palasová, P., Svobodová, H. & Věžník, A. (2012). Dopady SZP na rozvoj zemědělství v centrální části Drahanské vrchoviny. Geographia Cassoviensis, 6(2), 78–90.

  • [18] Křístková, Z. & Ratinger, T. (2014). Potencionální distribuční efekty reformy Společné zemědělské politiky a vyvolaná strukturální změna. Ekononický časopis 62(5): 473–494.

  • [19] MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2017). European Myriad of Approaches to Parasitic Commercial Practices. Oeconomia Copernicana 8(2), 167–180. DOI: 10.24136/oc.v8i2.11.

  • [20] MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2014a). Selected current aspects and issues of European integration. Ostrava: Key Publishing.

  • [21] MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2014b). The (DIS)harmony of opinions regarding domain names in the Czech Republic. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D 21(1), 73–84.

  • [22] MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2013). Internet my dearest, what type of European integration is the clearest. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 61(7), 2475–2481. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361072475.

  • [23] MacGregor Pelikánová, R, Císařová, J. & Beneš, M. (2017). The misleading perception of the purpose of the protection against misleading advertising by the EU law and its impact on the Czech Republic. Lawyer Quarterly 7(3), 145–161.

  • [24] Madau, F. A., Furesi, R. & Pulina, P. (2017). Technical efficiency and total factor productivity changes in European dairy farm sectors. Agricultural Food Economics 5, 17. DOI: 10.1186/s40100-017-0085-x.

  • [25] Malý, J. (2016). Small towns in the context of “borrowed size” and “agglomeration shadow” debates: The case of the South Moravian Region (Czech Republic). European Countryside 8(4), 333–350. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0024.

  • [26] Matejka, J. (2013). Internet jako objekt práva – Hledání rovnováhy autonomie a soukromí. Praha: CZ.NIC.

  • [27] Martinát, S. & Turečková, K. (2016). Local development in the post-mining countryside? Impacts of an agricultural ad plant on rural community. Geographia Technica 11(1), 54–66. DOI: 10.21163/GT_2016.111.07.

  • [28] Melecký, L. & Staníčková, M. (2017). Cost Efficiency of EU Funded Projects: Case of Selected SMEs in the Moravian-Silesian Region. In: Strategic Management and its Support by Information Systems (pp. 293–302). Ostrava: VŠB TU Ostrava.

  • [29] Nazzaro, C. & Marrota, G. (2016). The Common Agricultural Policy 2014–2020: scenarios for the European agricultural and rural systems. Agricultural and Food Economics, 4, 16. DOI: 10.1186/s40100-016-0060-y.

  • [30] Némethová, J. & Civáň, M. (2017). Regional differences in agriculture in Slovakia after its accession to the European Union. Quaestiones Geographicae 36(2), 9–21. DOI: 10.1515/quageo-2017-0011.

  • [31] Némethová, J. Dubcová, A., Kramáreková, H. (2014). The impact of the European Union´s Common Agricultural Policy in Slovakia. Moravian Geographical Reports 22(4), 51–64. DOI: 10.1515/mgr-2014-0023.

  • [32] Pakšiová, R. (2016). Understanding of corporate social responsibility in large companies in Slovakia within the context of a sustainable development. In: Economic policy in the European union member countries: proceedings of 14th international scientific conference (pp. 516–525). Opava: Silesian University.

  • [33] Petrick, M. & Zier, P. (2012). Common Agricultural Policy effects on dynamic labour use in agriculture. Food Policy, 37, 671–678. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.004.

  • [34] Piekarczyk, A. (2016). Contemporary organization and a perspective on integration and development. Oeconomia Copernicana 7(3): 467–483. DOI: 10.12775/OeC.2016.027.

  • [35] Pohulak-Żoledowska, E. (2016). Innovation in Contemporary Economies. Oeconomia Copernicana 7(3), 451–466. DOI: 10.12775/OeC.2016.026.

  • [36] Prášilová, M. & Procházková, R. (2016). Structural Changes of Czech Agriculture and the Impact of these on Inner Foodstuffs Self-Sufficiency of Czech Republic. In: Soliman, K. S., ed., Vision 2020: Innovation Management, Development Sustainability, and Competitive Economic Growth (pp. 2905–2919). Upper Merion, PA: IBIMA Publishing.

  • [37] Reiff, M., Surmanová, K., Balcerzak, A. & Pietrzak, M. (2016). Multiple Criteria Analysis of European Union Agriculture Performance. Journal of International Studies 9(3), 62–74. DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-3/5.

  • [38] Růžičková, E. D. & MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2014). Recent trends in the regime of transfer tax in the Czech Republic and selected EU member states. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D 21(2), 25–33.

  • [39] Severini, S. & Sorrentino, A. (2017). Efficiency and coordination in the EU agri-food systems. Agricultural and Food Economics, 5(1). 15. DOI: 10.1186/s40100-017-0086-9.

  • [40] Sexton, R. J. (2012). Market power, misconceptions, and modern agricultural markets. American Journal Agricultural Economics 95(2), 209–219. DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aas102.

  • [41] Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research – A Practical Handbook. 4th Edition, London: SAGE.

  • [42] Střeleček, F., Losová, J. & Kvapilík, J. (2004). Development of livestock in numbers and structure from the regional and administrative aspects. Agricultural EconomicsCzech, 50(2): 47–57.

  • [43] Svobodová, H. (2011). Vývoj zemědělské výroby v České republice pod vlivvem společné zemědělské politiky EU. Acta Regionalia et Environmentalica 8(1), 15–21.

  • [44] Śpiewak, R. (2016). Multifunctionality of organic farming: Case study from southern Poland. European Countryside 8(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0001.

  • [45] Tinbergen, J. (1956). Economic Policy: Principles and Design. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

  • [46] Toma, P., Miglietta, P. P., Zurlini, G., Valente, D. & Petrosillo, I. (2017). A non-parametric bootstrap-data envelopment analysis approach for environmental policy planning and management of agricultural efficiency in EU countries. Ecological Indicators 83, 132–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.049.

  • [47] Vaishar, A., Zapletalová, J., Nováková, E. (2016). Between urban and rural: Sustainability of small towns in the Czech Republic. European Countryside 8(4), 351–372. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0025.

  • [48] Vaishar, A. & Zapletalová, J. (2009). Sustainable development of rural microregions in the Czech borderland. Moravian Geographical Reports, 17(4): 34–43.

  • [49] Velázquez, G. & Buffaria, B. (2017). About farmers´ bargaining power within the new CAP. Agricultural and Food Economics 5, 16. DOI: 10.1186/s40100-017-0084-y.

  • [50] Věžník, A., Navrátil, M. & Skácel, P. (2016). Czech Agriculture after Accession to EU: Changes, Regional Differences. In: Lněnička, L., ed., Procceding of 23rd Central European Conference: Central Europe Area in View of Current Geography (pp. 373–380). Brno: Masaryk University. DOI: 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8314-2016.

  • [51] Věžník, A., Král, M. & Svobodová, H. (2013). Agriculture of the Czech Republic in the 21st century: From productivism to post-productivism. Quaestiones Geographicae 32(4), 7–14. DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2013-0029.

  • [52] Věžník, A. & Konečný, O. (2011). Agriculture of the Czech Republic after accession to the EU: regional differentiation. Moravian Geographical Reports 19(1), 50–60.

  • [53] Zagata, L., Hádková, Š. & Mikovcová, M. (2015). Basic outline of the problem of the “ageing population of farmers” in the Czech Republic. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics 7(1), 89–96.

  • [54] European Commission (2018). Common Agriculture Policy at glance. Accessed on 7th September 2018 and available at

  • [55] European Commission (2010). COM 2010(672) The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future. Accessed on 7th September 2018 and available at EC …


Journal + Issues