Quality of Rural Life. Editorial 16 June 2018

Antonín Vaishar 1 , Lucie Vidovićová 2  and Elisabete Figueiredo 3
  • 1 CSc., Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00, Brno, Czechia
  • 2 Ph.D., Office for Population Studies, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Joštova 10,, Brno, Czech Republic
  • 3 Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal


The paper discusses the concept of the quality of life and its measuring. It tries to explain its peculiarities in the rural space considering different levels of education, professional activities, mobility, ways of dwelling, access to the social and technical infrastructure. The subjective perception of both urban and rural people to the rural quality of life can be manifested in moving in and moving out. The main shortages of the rural quality of life can be seen (by rural people) in a poor access to the prestigious and well-paid jobs and to a richer social life. The main advantages of the rural way of life are generally evaluated (by urban people) by better access to the nature. A promotion of the local identity is considered as an important tool for improving the rural quality of life (besides of a solution of infrastructural problems), considering the enormous difference among European rural areas of a big differentiation of the European countryside. The last part of the paper summarizes the contributions of the special number.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Almsted, Å., Brouder, P., Karlsson, S. & Lundmark, L. (2014). Beyond post-productivism: from rural policy discourse to rural diversity. European Countryside 6(4), 297-306. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2014-0016.

  • [2] Bock, B., Osti, G. & Ventura, F. (2016). Rural migration and new patterns of exclusion and integration in Europe. In Schucksmith, M. & Brown, D. L., eds., Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies (not paged). Abingdon: Routledge.

  • [3] Brown, D. L. & Schucksmith, M. (2016). A new lens for examining the rural change. European Countryside 8(2), 183-188. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0015.

  • [4] Carneiro, M. J., Eusébio, C. & Caldeira, A. (2017). The Influence of Social Contact in Residents’ Perceptions of the Tourism Impact on Their Quality of Life: A Structural Equation Model, Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 19:1, 1-30. DOI: 10.1080/1528008X.2017.1314798.

  • [5] Carta, M. G., Aguglia, E., Caraci, F., Dell'Osso, L., Di Sciascio, G., Drago, F., Del Giudice, E., Faravelli, C., Hardoy, M. C., Lecca, M. E., Moro, M. F., Calò, S., Casacchia, M., Angermeyer, M. C. & Balestrieri, M. (2012). Quality of Life and Urban / Rural Living: Preliminary Results of a Community Survey in Italy. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 8, 169-174. DOI: 10.2174/1745017901208010169.

  • [6] D’Agostini, L. R. & Fantini, A. C. (2008). Quality of Life and Quality of Living Conditions in Rural Areas: Distinctively Perceived and Quantitatively Distinguished. Social Indicators Research, 89(3), 487-499. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-008-9245-4.

  • [7] Dax, T., Strahl, W. & Kirwan, J. (2016). The LEADER programme 2007-2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies 23(1), 56-68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.

  • [8] Diener, E. & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research 40(1-2), 189-216. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006859511756.

  • [9] Donham, J. & Thelin, A. (2016). Agricultural Medicine: Rural Occupational and Environmental Health Safety 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley.

  • [10] Dragomirecká, E. & Škoda, C. (1997a). Kvalita života. Vymezení, definice a historický vývoj pojmu v sociální psychiatrii. Česká a Slovenská Psychiatrie 93(2), 102-108.

  • [11] Eusébio, C., Carneiro, M. J., Kastenholz, E. & Alvelos, H. (2015). Social tourism programmes for the senior market: a benefit segmentation analysis, Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 15:1, 59-79. DOI: 10.1080/14766825.2015.1117093.

  • [12] Figueiredo, E. (2009). One rural, two visions - environmental issues and images on rural areas in Portugal. European Countryside, Vol. 1(1), 9-21. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-009-0002-8.

  • [13] Figueiredo, E. (2013). McRural, No Rural or What Rural? - Some reflections on rural reconfiguration processes based on the promotion of Schist Villages Network, Portugal. In: Silva, L. & Figueiredo, E., eds., Shaping Rural Areas in Europe - Perceptions and Outcomes on the Present and the Future (pp. 129-146), Springer: Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6796-6_9.

  • [14] Gstrein, M., Mateeva, L., Rodiga-Laßnig, P., Abbott, P. & Wallace, C. (2017). European Quality of Life Survey 016: Quality of Life, quality of public services, and quality of society. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2806/37653.

  • [15] Hagerty, M., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A., Land, K., Michalos, A., Peterson, M., Sharpe, A., Sirgy J. & Vogel, J. (2001). Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and Agenda for Research. Social Indicators Research 55(1), 1-96. DOI: 10.1023/A:101081131.

  • [16] Hedberg, C. & Haandrikmann, K. (2014). Repopulation of the Swedish countryside: Globalization by international migration. Journal of Rural Studies 34, 128-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.005.

  • [17] Heřmanová, E. (2012). Koncepty, teorie a měření kvality života. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.

  • [18] Kala, L., Galčanová, L. & Pelikán, V. (2016). Dential preferences in the context of voluntary simple lifestyles: What motivates contemporary Czech simplifiers to reside in the countryside? Human Affairs: Post-Disciplinary Humanities and Social Sciences Quarterly 26(4), 410-421. DOI: 10.1515/humaff-2016-0035.

  • [19] Kivitalo, M., Kumpulainen, K. & Soini, K. (2015). Exploring culture and sustainability in rural Finland. In Dessein, J., Battaglini, E. & Horlings, L., eds., Cultural Sustainability and Regional Development (pp. 94-107). Abingdon: Routledge.

  • [20] Leck, C., Evans, N. & Upton, D. (2014). Agriculture - who cares? An investigation of “care” farming in UK. Journal of Rural Studies 34, 313-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.012.

  • [21] Lehman, A. F., Ward, N. C. & Linn, L. S. (1982). Chronic mental patients: The Quality of Life Issue. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139(10), 1271-1276. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.139.10.1271.

  • [22] Machold, I. & Dax, T. (2016). Migrationen und Integration: Anstoßzur sozio-kulturellen Veränderung ländlicher Regionen durch internationale Migration. Europa Regional 24(34), 62-76.

  • [23] Morén-Alegret, R. & Solana, M. (2004). Foreign immigrants in Spanish rural areas and small towns: current situation and perspectives. Finisterra 77, 21-38. DOI: 10.18055/Finis1559.

  • [24] Pisani, E., Franceschetti, G., Secco, L. & Christoforou, A., eds. (2017). Social capital and local development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5.

  • [25] Pospěch, P., Spěšná, D., Staveník, A. (2015). Images of a good village. A visual analysis of the rural idyll in the “Village of the Year” competition in the Czech Republic. European Countryside 7(2), 68-86. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2015-0005.

  • [26] Schafft, K. A. (2016). Rural education as rural development: Understanding the rural school- community well-being linkage in a 21st-century policy context. Peabody Journal of Education 91(2), 137-154. DOI: 10.1080/0161956X.2016.1151734.

  • [27] Smith, G. R., Strachan, G., Gibbon, D. (2018). Rural well-being: the push and pull and the diversity in-between. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, in print. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2018.1446369.

  • [28] Somarriba Arechavala, N., Zarzosa Espina, P. & Pena Trapero, B. (2015). Social Indicators Research 120(2), 323-343. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0595-9.

  • [29] Šťastná, M. & Vaishar, A. (2017). The relationship between public transport and the progressive development of rural areas. Land Use Policy 67, 107-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.022.

  • [30] Stockdale, A. (2015). Contemporary and ‘messy’ rural in‐migration processes: Comparing counterurban and lateral rural migration. Population, Space and Place 22(6), 599-616. DOI: 10.1002/psp.1947.

  • [31] Tulla, A. F., Valentina-Stoica, I., Pallarès-Blanch, M., Zamfir, D. (2017). Can naturbanization promote environmentally friendly built-up areas? A comparison between Cadí-Moixeró (Catalonia, Spain) and Comana (Romania) natural parks. European Countryside 9(4), 679-709. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0039.

  • [32] Vaishar, A. & Pavlů, A. (2018). Outmigration intentions of secondary school students from a rural micro-region in the Czech inner periphery: a case study of the Bystřice nad Pernštejnem area in the Vysočina region. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica 53(1), 49-57. DOI: 10.14712/23361980.2018.5.

  • [33] Vaznoniené, G. & Pakeltiené, R. (2017). Methods for the assessment of rural social infrastructure needs. European Countryside 9(3), 526-540. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0031.

  • [34] Weeks, W. B., Kazis, L. E., Shen, Y., Cong, Z., Ren, X. S., Miller, D., Lee, A. & Perlin, J. B. (2004). Differences in health-related quality of life in rural and urban veterans. American Journal of Public Health 94(10), 1762-1767.

  • [35] Zanden van der, E. H., Verburg, P. H., Schulp, C. J. E. & Verkerk, P. J. (2017). Trade-offs of European agricultural abandonment. Land Use Policy 62, 290-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.003.


Journal + Issues