Specialities in the Institutionalisation of Hungarian Leader Local Action Groups

Open access

Abstract

LEADER local action groups (LAGs) have become an integral part of the European rural landscape. Our article examines how LEADER groups operate in Hungary by analysing their territorial, symbolic and institutional shape, and the established role of LAGs in Hungary. The results reveal an irregular territorial shape combined with uncertain symbolic form. The institutional constellation is significantly influenced by the size of the member municipalities. Action groups integrating smaller local authorities must involve more NGOs and enterprises to fulfil participatory regulations. Local bureaux are small and their functions are not differentiated according to the state of development. Although Hungarian LAGs, in a European comparison, have many levels of tasks their level of governance is relatively low.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Bedrac M. & Cunder T. (2010). “Leader” approach and local development strategies in Slovenia. In Fieldsend A. ed. Rural Areas and Development (pp. 245–256). European Rural Development Network Debrecen.

  • [2] Bogár E. (2011). The LEADER program in Hungary and in Europe. Journal of Central European Agriculture 12(3) 486–497. DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/12.3.945.

  • [3] Csurgó B. & Kovách I. (2015). The LEADER Programme in Hungary – Bottom-up Development with top-down control? In Granberg L. Andersson K. & Kovách I. eds. Evaluating the European approach to rural development (pp 53–78). Farnham: Ashgate.

  • [4] Finta I. et al. (2013). LEADER 2014–2020. Javaslatok a felkészüléshez. Budapest: Institute of Economics Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

  • [5] Furmaniewicz M. & Macken-Walsh Á. (2016). Government within governance? Polish rural development partnerships through the lens of functional representation. Journal of Rural Studies 46 12–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.05.004.

  • [6] Gailing L. (2012). Dimensions of the social construction of landscapes – Perspectives of new institutionalism. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of SciencesSection A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 66 195–205.

  • [7] Gailing L. & Leibenaht M. (2015). The social construction of landscapes: two theoretical lenses and their empirical applications. Landscape Research 40(2) 123–138. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2013.775233.

  • [8] Fekete G. É. (2001). Együtt — de hogyan? Innovációk a kistérségi fejlesztésekben. Miskolc-Pécs: Institute for Regional Studies Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

  • [9] Kisiel R. & Gierwiatowska M. (2013). Functioning of the Polish LAG in the context of the LEADER initiative. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Oeconomia 12(3) 39–50.

  • [10] Kiss M. (2016). Helyi termék mint továbblépés? A helyitermék-előállítás szerepe és típusai a hátrányos helyzetű térségekben. Erdélyi Társadalom 14(1) 9–30.

  • [11] Kovách I. (2000). LEADER a new social order and the Central and East–European Countries. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2) 181–190. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00140.

  • [12] Kovács K. & Váradi M. eds. (2013). Hátrányban vidéken. Budapest: Argumentum.

  • [13] Kovács T. (2012). Vidékfejlesztési politika. Budapest: Dialóg Campus.

  • [14] Krámos D. (2015). The topography of possible Hungarian renewable energy regions and cities: a possible interpretation based on three models. International Journal of Regional Development 2(1) 1–16. DOI: 10.5296/ijrd.v2i1.7022.

  • [15] Krolopp A. Marticsek J. Petri M. Szuda Z. & Francia R. (2005). “Egy európai eszme és hazai megvalósítása” LEADERKözösségi kezdeményezés a vidék gazdasági fejlesztése érdekében. Budapest: CEEWEB.

  • [16] Kull M. (2014). European integration and rural development: actors institutions and power. Farnham: Ashgate.

  • [17] Kurka B. Maier G. & Sedlacek S. (2007). Breaking the vicious cycle in peripheral rural regions: the case of “Waldviertler Wohlviertel” in Austria [Discussion Papers] Vienna University of Economics and Business.

  • [18] Lukesch R. (2007). The LAG-Handbook. A guide through the stunning world of local action groups. Brussel: LEADER+ Observatory Contact Point.

  • [19] Maurel M. (2008). Local development stakeholders and the European model: learning the LEADER approach in the new member states. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 44(3) 511–529.

  • [20] Maurel M. (2016). Building local development on territorial identity: lessons from implementing the LEADER public action model in Central Europe. In Regions in Europe. Administrative structures and territorial identity issues (not paged) Paris: L’Harmettan.

  • [21] Paasi A. (1986). The institutionalisation of regions: a theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia 164(1) 105–146. DOI: 10.11143/9052.

  • [22] Paasi A. (1991). Deconstructing regions: notes on the scales of spatial life Environment and Planning A 23 239–256. DOI: 10.1068/a230239.

  • [23] Paasi A. (1996). Territories boundaries and consciousness: the changing geographies of the Finnish-Russian Border. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  • [24] Raagmaa G. (2015). Territorial governance and core-periphery relations: the implications of European Policy concepts for Central and Eastern Europe. In: Lang T. Henn S. Sgibnev W. & Ehrlich K. eds. Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization. New geographies of Europe (pp. 287–308). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • [25] Ruszkai Cs. &. Kovács T. (2013). The Community Initiative LEADER I and the implementation and results of the Hungarian Pilot LEADER programme in rural development. Bulletin of Geography. Socio–economic Series 19 87–97. DOI: 10.2478/bog-2013-0006.

  • [26] Salchner G. (2014). Setting up effective management in rural development. In Keszthelyi A. ed. Proceedings of FIKUSZ 2014 (pp. 261–272). Budapest: Óbuda University.

  • [27] Semian M. Chromý P. & Kučera Z. (2016). Name as a regional brand: The case of Local Action Groups in Czechia. Journal of Language and Politics 15(6) 768–789. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.15.6.06sem.

  • [28] Šifta M. & Chromý P. (2017). The importance of symbols in the region formation process. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 71(2) 98–113. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2017.1317285.

  • [29] Svobodová H. (2015). Do the Czech Local Action Groups Respect the LEADER Method? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63(5) 1769–1777. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563051769.

  • [30] Tácsik B. (2009). Ipoly-menti Palócok Helyi Közösség genezise. Különös tekintettel a BelsőCserhát vidékre és a LEADER megközelítés szerepére [MA thesis]. Eger: Eszterházy Károly Főiskola.

  • [31] Thuesen A. A. (2009). Is LEADER Elitist or Inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG Boards in the 2007–2013 Rural Development and Fisheries Programmes Sociologia Ruralis 50(1) 31–45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00500.x.

  • [32] AEID (1994). LEADER Directory of the 217 Local Action Groups. LEADER Coordinating Unit. 470 p.

  • [33] Brosei P. (2011). The principles of the Leader approach: lessons learned and future potential for local rural development. European Economic and Social Committee Public Hearing “Leader as a tool for local development” 20 June 2011 [unpublished presentation]. Retrieved from http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/leader-2062011---mr-brosei.pdf (Last access: 7 March 2017)

  • [34] Brosei P. (2012). Multi-level governance in LEADER and lessons learned from the implementation. Open Days 2012 11 October European Commission DG AGRI Unit “Consistency of rural development“ [unpublished presentation]. Retrieved from http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/fms/pdf/54EB3377-0A21-52D3-2350-EAC29951DBC1.pdf (Last access 3 Sept 2014).

  • [35] Fekete G. É. (2014). Helyi termékek a helyi gazdaságfejlesztésben. Presentation at VII. Magyar Földrajzi Konferencia Miskolc-Lillafüred 2014.09.02.

  • [36] Lechner Nonprofit Kft. (2015). Nemzeti LEADER Kézikönyv. LEADER Helyi Fejlesztési Stratégia Tervezési Útmutató 2014–2020. Miniszterelnökség Agrár-Vidékfejlesztési Programokért Felelős Helyettes Államtitkárság.

  • [37] Nemes G. (2005). Az előcsatlakozási programok (SAPARD PHARE ISPA) tapasztalatai. AVOP LEADER+ készségek elsajátítása tananyag PROMEI-Faluműhely Alapítvány-SZRVA-ZRVA 2005 9.1. fejezet (pp. 316–336) http://www.promei.hu/index.php?m=1134&id=1066.

  • [38] ÚMVP (2013). A helyi akciócsoportok munkaszervezeteinek elérhetősége. http://umvp.eu/?q=node/645LEADER_HACS_elérhetőségek_2012_11_ho_IH_orszagos.xls (20 September 2014).

  • [39] 1312/2016. (VI. 13.) Korm. határozat a központi hivatalok és a költségvetési szervi formában működő minisztériumi háttérintézmények felülvizsgálatával kapcsolatos intézkedésekről.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.651

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 249 141 48
PDF Downloads 145 90 13