Preliminary case study on the environmental quality and life quality in the Romanian rural rudimentary communities

Open access

Preliminary case study on the environmental quality and life quality in the Romanian rural rudimentary communities

In the present study, our intention is to reveal the positive and negative aspects of living, in the rural communities appearing in Romania in the last 5-6 decades; often, these have occupied territories with astonishing natural landscapes, situated close to large rural settlements with a century-old history. If, from the perspective of the quality of the natural components of the environment, inside the perimeter of these settlements we can talk about extremely favorable habitat conditions, from the perspective of the access to utilities and technical facilities, we can identify a primitive, rudimentary lifestyle, whose only goal is most oftenly, the access of the minimum resources for subsistence. This case study has been made on two communities, situated at the contact between the Subcarpathians of Arges and the Iezer-Papusa and Leaota Mountains, respectively: the Gura Pravat village, a formal settlement, which extends along the left bank of the Argesel river, north of Namaiesti tourist village and an informal village situated on the left bank of the Dambovita river, inside the Complexe Reserve Cheile de la Cetateni.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abraham D. & Badescu I. (1994). Convietuire etnica si conflicte interetnice. In Sociologie Romaneasca nr.2-3/1994. Bucharest: Romanian Academy Publishing House.

  • Achim V. (1990). Tiganii in istoria Romanini. Bucharest: Enciclopedica Publishing House.

  • Anghel I. et al. (2000). Rromii-Istorie si cultura. Aportul minoritatilor nationale in patrimoniul cultural romanesc. Bucharest: OPRE.

  • Apparicio P. (2000). Residential Segregation Indices: A tool Integrated into a Geographical Information System Cybergeo No. 134.

  • Arges County-State of Environment Report (2009). Retrieved from

  • Bacanu M. (1996). Tiganii-minoritate nationala sau majoritate infractionala? Bucharest: Bravo Press Publishing House.

  • Badescu I. et al. (1994). Fenomenul etnic intre stiinta si ideologie Bucharest: Romanian Academy Publishing House.

  • Balasescu A. (1997). Rromii-constructie identitara. Cazul comunei Cristian judetul Sibiu Rev. Cercetari Sociale no 3/1997 IMAS sa Bucharest.

  • Cherata L. (2003). Dictionar al limbii romani. Bucharest: Orion.

  • Cobianu-Bacanu M. (1996). Mutatii in identificarea etnica a rromilor Rev. Sociologie Romanesca No. 1-2/1996. Bucharest: Romanian Academy Publishing House.

  • Costachie S. (1997). Socio-demographic characteristics of Romania Gypses Minorities. Liverpool Hope Press.

  • Cretan R. (2006). Etnie confesiune si optiune electorala in Banat. Timişoara: University of West Press.

  • Crowe D. (1994). A history of gypsies in Eastern Europe and Russia. New York: St. Martin's Press.

  • Cucu V. (1992). Consideratii geografice privind unitatea etnica a Romaniei in Terra No. 1-2/1992.

  • Dâmbovia County-State of Environment Report (2009). Retrieved from

  • Enciclopedia Geografica a Romaniei (1982). Bucharest: Science and Enciclopediae Publishing House.

  • Gounev P. & Bezlov T. (2006). The Roma in Bulgaria' s Criminal Justice System: From Ethnic Profiling to Imprisonment. Critical Criminology 14(3) 313-338.

  • Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (2002). The Roma Population in South Eastern Europe. N.p.: InterGraf-Verlag.

  • Kogalniceanu M. (1997). Schita asupra istoriei moravurilor si limbii tiganilor in Rromathan vol. 1.No 2 Bucharest: Info Design.

  • Latea P. (1997). Les Tsiganes ou le destin sauvage des Roms de l'Est - recenzie. In Rromathan vol.I nr.1/1997 Bucharest: Info Design.

  • Latea P. Cristea O. & Chelcea L. (1996). Dincolo de iluzia unitatii. In: Social Researches Journal no. 4/1996 IMAS SA Bucharest.

  • Liegeois J.-P. & Nicolae G. (1995). Roma/Gypsies: A European Minority. London: Minority Rights Group.

  • Lipsky M. (1980). Level-Street Bureaucracy Dillemas of the Individual in the Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Manea G. (2005): Zone si arii protejate si valorificarea lor in turism. Bucharest: Credis.

  • Mărginean I. (2008): Condiţiile de viaţă din mediul rural. Retrieved from

  • Matei E. (2007). Ecologia asezarilor umane O abordare din perspectiva geografica Bucharest: Universitara Publishing House.

  • Merfea M. (1994). Cu privire la istoria rromilor Revista de Cercetari Sociale 1994(4) 156-165.

  • Mihailova V. et al. (2007). Wilson's disease in two consecutive generations in a Bulgarian Roma family Journal of Neurology 254(10) 1462-1463.

  • Nae M. (2006). Geografia calitatii vietii urbane. Metode de analiza Bucharest: Universitara Publishing House.

  • Ramet S. (2008). Redefining the Boundaries of Human Rights: The Case of Eastern Europe Hum Rights Revue 9 1-13.

  • Roma Housing and Settlements in South-Eastern Europe. Profile and Achievements in Serbia in a Comparative Framework. Summary and Recommendations. Retrieved from Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights web page

  • Sandu D. (2005). Dezvoltare comunitara. Cercetare practică ideologie. Iasi: Polirom.

  • Stiftung F. E. (2003). Rromii in Europa de Sud-Est Bucharest: Intergraf.

  • Stroschein S. (2002). NGO Strategies for Hungarian and Roma Minorities in Central Europe Voluntas 13(1) 1-26

  • Studiu privind integrarea sociala a rromilor in localitati cu structura etnica mixta (1991). Bucharest: CURS Institutul de proiectare cercetare si tehnica de calcul in constructii. (research report).

  • Surdu M. et al. (1998). Situatia Sociala a rromilor din judetul Buzau in Revista de Cercetari Sociale 1998(3-4).

  • Tamas C. (2001). Istoria tiganilor din Tara Romanesca Bucharest: Oscar.

  • Vintila G. Dumitrache L. (2000). Calitatea locuirii in mediul urban din Romania si impactul ei asupra populatiei. Terra. Journal of Society of Geography from Romania 30(1) 42-46.

  • William P. (1989). Tsiganes: identite evolution Paris: Syros Alternatives.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.651

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 160 72 0
PDF Downloads 77 49 0