Company Changing Status and Its Linking to Competitiveness

Dragana Radenković-Jocić 1  and Ivan Barun 2
  • 1 University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Serbia
  • 2 PhD student at Faculty of Law University of Niš, Serbia


The authors present the issues and challenges related to the changes in status of a company and its impact on competitiveness. Status changes of companies, mostly mergers and acquisitions of companies, are one of the ways in which capital owners and management direct economic activities with the aim of maximizing profits. In order to make the right and justified decision, in terms of achieving the economic interests of the company, it is essential to know the laws and regulations in this area. This paper should provide answers on various questions which will be presented to decision makers in every company, considering status changes. Bearing in mind that the question of status changes often associated with an international element, the authors will pay special attention on the EU legislation and current legal framework in the Republic of Serbia.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bebchuk, L., A. Ferrell (2001) “A New Approach to Regulatory Competition”, Virginia Law Review 87

  • Bennedsen, M., K. Nielsen (2004) “The impact of a break-through rule on european firms”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 17: 259-283.

  • Bertrand, M., S. Mullinathan (1998) “Executive Compensation and Incentives: The Impact of Takeover Legislation”, Working Paper, NBER: 6830

  • CMS (2011) Guide to Mandatory Offers and Squeeze-Outs, CMS.

  • Coates, J. C. (2003) “Ownership, takeovers and eu law: how contestable should eu corporations be?”, ECGI Law Working Paper, No. 11, 386-405.

  • Čolić, B. (1999) "Povezivanje kompanija, statusne promene, promene pravne forme i zaštita prava poverilaca i akcionara", Labour Relations and Management, No. 9: 19

  • Davies, P. (1992) "The regulation of defensive tactics in the united kingdom and the united states", European takeovers: 210.

  • EC Report 2007

  • Ferrell, All. (2003) "Why continental European takeover law matters", Discussion Paper No. 454, Harvard Law School Cambridge, 12/2003: 4

  • Mayer, F., Rossi (2002) “The Origination and Evolution of Ownership and Control”, Working Paper

  • Mccahery, J. A., E. P. M. Vermeulen, and T. Law, (2010) “Does the takeover bids directive need revision?”, Law and Economics Discussion Paper, Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC)

  • Menjucq, M. (2006) “The European Regime on Takeovers”, ECFR, 2.

  • La Porta R., F. Lopez de Silanes, A. Shleifer, R.W. Vishny (2000) “Investor protection and corporate governance”, Journal Finance Economy, No.3: 58.

  • OECD (2001) "The Role of the Judiciary in Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Economic Goals", Company Law Reform in OECD Countries a Comparative Outlook of Current Trends, OECD Publishing

  • OECD (2007) “Economic and other impacts of foreign corporate takeovers in OECD countries”, International Investment Perspectives Edition, OECD Publishing

  • Papadopoulos, T. (2008) “Legal aspects of the breakthrough rule of the european takeover bid directive”, Working Paper, No.3/1: 1-24.

  • Papadopoulos, T. (2007) “The mandatory provisions of the EU Takeover Bid Directive and their deficiencies”, Law and Financial Markets Review (November): 525-533.

  • Radenković-Jocić D., Sekulić V. (2013) Korporativno upravljanje, Niš: Ekonomski fakultet.

  • Sekula, N. (2007) "Statusne promene kompanija", Law Practice, 10: 18-21

  • Ventoruzzo, M. (2010) “Freeze-outs: transcontinental analysis and reform proposals”, Legal Studies Research Paper, Dickinson School of Law, No.5

  • Zingales, L., A. Dyck, (2004) “Private benefits of control: an international comparison”, The Journal of Finance, 59 (2): 537-600.


Journal + Issues