Despite their alleged dual focus on content and language learning, CLIL classes are, more often than not, focused on meaning transmission and comprehension and promote an incidental approach to language learning. Yet, empirical evidence from second language acquisition research points out that a mere focus on meaning is not enough for learners to reach proficiency in the target language and some awareness of the linguistic form is necessary for language learning to occur. In order to foster simultaneous subject matter and foreign language learning, CLIL practitioners need to create opportunities for learners to notice the language of the content while performing content-related activities and tasks. We propose a series of pedagogical strategies to achieve this awareness of the form in the context of the CLIL class, drawing on empirical evidence from language learning research and our own experience as CLIL teachers and teacher trainers.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Coyle, Do. CLIL: Planning Tools for Teachers. University of Nottingham, 2005.
Coyle, Do. “Strengthening Integrated Learning: Towards a New Era for Pluriliteracies and Intercultural Learning.” Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, vol. 8, no. 2, 2015, pp. 84-103.
Coyle, Do, Philip Hood and David Marsh. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Ernst Klett Sprachen, 2010.
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms, vol. 20, John Benjamins Publishing, 2007.
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. “Cognitive Discourse Functions: Specifying an Integrative Interdisciplinary Construct. Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education, edited by Nikula, Tarja et al., Multilingual Matters, 2016, pp. 29-54.
De Graaff, Rick, et al. “An Observation Tool for Effective L2 Pedagogy in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 10, no. 5, 2007, pp. 603-24.
DeKeyser, Robert, and Jenifer Larson-Hall. “What Does the Critical Period Really Mean?” Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, edited by Judith Kroll and Annette Groot, Oxford UP, 2005, pp. 88-108.
Doughty, Catherine. “Cognitive Underpinnings of Focus on Form.” Cognition and Second Language Instruction, 2001, pp. 206-57.
Ellis, Rod. “Introduction: Investigating Form-Focused Instruction.” Form-Focused Instruction and Second Language Learning: Language Learning Monograph, edited by Rod Ellis, Wiley-Blackwell, 2001, pp. 1-46.
Ellis, Rod. Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford UP, 2003.
Ellis, Rod. “Task-Based Language Teaching: Sorting out the Misunderstandings.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 19, no. 3, 2009, pp. 221-46.
Ellis, Rod. “Focus on Form: A Critical Review.” Language Teaching Research, vol. 20, no. 3, 2016, pp. 405-28.
Ellis, Rod, et al. “Preemptive Focus on Form in the ESL Classroom.” Tesol Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, 2001, pp. 407-32.
Eurydice. Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, 2017.
Gajo, Laurent. “Linguistic Knowledge and Subject Knowledge: How Does Bilingualism Contribute to Subject Development?” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 10, no. 5, 2007, pp. 563-81.
Halbach, Ana. “The Primary School Teacher and the Challenges of Bilingual Education.” CLIL across Educational Levels, edited by Emma Dafouz and Michele Guerrini, Richmond, 2009, pp. 19-26.
Lindahl, Kristen, and Naomi M. Watkins. “Creating a Culture of Language Awareness in Content--Based Contexts.” TESOL Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, 2015, pp. 777-89.
Lyster, Roy, and Leila Ranta. “Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol.19, no. 1, 1997, pp. 37-66.
Mehisto, Peeter, et al. Uncovering CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Macmillan, 2008.
Meyer, Oliver, et al. “A Pluriliteracies Approach to Content and Language Integrated Learning--Mapping Learner Progressions in Knowledge Construction and Meaning-Making.” Language, Culture and Curriculum, vol. 28, no. 1, 2015, pp. 41-57.
Muñoz, Carmen. “CLIL: Some Thoughts on its Psycholinguistic Principles.” Revista española de lingüística aplicada, vol. 1, 2007, pp.17-26.
Pérez Vidal, Carmen. “The Integration of Content and Language in the Classroom: A European Approach to Education (the Second Time around).” CLIL across Educational Levels, edited by Emma Dafouz and Michele Guerrini, Richmond, 2009, pp. 3-16.
Pérez Vidal, Carmen. “The Need for Focus on Form (FoF) in Content and Language Integrated Approaches: An Exploratory Study.” Revista española de lingüística aplicada, vol. 1, 2007, pp. 39-54.
Rose, David, and JR Martin Hardback. Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox, 2012.
Shanahan, Timothy, and Cynthia Shanahan. “Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content-Area Literacy.” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 78, no. 1, 2008, pp. 40-59.
Skehan, Peter. “A Framework for the Implementation of Task-Based Instruction.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 1, 1996, pp. 38-62.
Spada, Nina. “Beyond Form-Focused Instruction: Reflections on Past, Present and Future Research.” Language Teaching, vol. 44, no. 2, 2011, pp. 225-36.