This article presents the results of a survey conducted in the Innovative University of Eurasia (InEU) about the necessity of implementing English as a medium of instruction (EMI) at the baccalaureate and master’s degree levels. It describes the findings obtained through semi open-ended questionnaires and interviews with two focus groups: InEU administration members and faculty representatives. The data collected suggest a rather positive general attitude of the respondents of both groups to English-medium instruction at the university, a special emphasis being made on the global status of English and internationalization of education. However, the majority of respondents raised concern about the impact of English-medium teaching on the quality of subject learning since it depends on an English proficiency level of both students and teachers and their motivation to study/teach in English. The survey data also indicate other important issues connected with teaching-in-English implementation at the university, such as finance, the pace of implementation, preparedness of students and teachers, support structures and incentives.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Brown, Howard. “Contextual Factors Driving the Growth of Undergraduate English-Medium Instruction Programmes at Universities in Japan.” Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 1, 2014, pp. 50-63.
Jensen, Christian, and Jacob Trøgersen. “Danish University Lecturers’ Attitudes towards English as the Medium of Instruction.” Ibérica, vol. 22, 2011, pp. 13-34.
Kılıçkaya, Ferit. “Instructors’ Attitudes towards English-Medium Instruction in Turkey.” Humanizing Language Teaching, vol. 8, no. 6, 2006, pp. 1-9, www.eric.ed.gov/?id=ED570169. Accessed 10 December 2015.
Kirkpatrick, Andy. “English as a Medium of Instruction in East and Southeast Asian Universities.” Dynamic Ecologies. A Relational Perspective on Languages Education in the Asia-Pacific Region, edited by Neil Murray and Angela Scarino, Springer, 2014, pp. 15-29, www.springer.com/978-94-007-7971-6. Accessed 6 June 2015.
Manakul, Werawal. “English in Engineering Education for Japanese Graduate Students.” Australian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 13, no. 2, 2007, pp. 53-62.
Manh, Le Duc. “English as a Medium of Instruction in Asian Universities: the Case of Vietnam.” Language Education in Asia, vol. 3, no. 2, 2012, pp. 263-67. LEIA, dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/12/V3/I2/A14/Manh. Accessed 1 April 2014.
Shahsad, Mirza Naveed, et al. “The Role of “Radical Change” in Medium of Instruction and its Impact on Learning.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 4, no. 1, 2013, pp. 36-44.
Soren, Joyce Kling. “Teacher Identity in English-Medium Instruction: Teacher Cognitions from a Danish Tertiary Education Context.” Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty of Humanities from University of Copenhagen, 2013, www.tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00863816. Accessed 5 April 2015.
Splunder, Frank Van. “English as a Medium of Instruction in Flemish Higher Education – Language and Identity Management in Dutch-Speaking Context.” Doctoral Dissertation. Lancaster University, 2010, www.ua.ac.be›download.aspx?c=frank.vansplunder…30600. Accessed 25 March 2015.
Tatzl, Dietmar. “English-Medium Masters’ Programmes at an Austrian University of Applied Sciences: Attitudes, Experiences and Challenges.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 10, 2011, pp. 252-70.
Vu, Nha T.T, and Anne Burns. “English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges for Vietnamese Tertiary Lecturers.” The Journal of Asia TEFL, vol. 11, no. 3, 2014, pp. 1-31.