New Technologies, Multiple Literacies and Teaching English as a Foreign Language

Silene Cardoso 1
  • 1 University of Lisbon


This article presents and briefly discusses the results from a survey conducted with English teachers of the third cycle and secondary education in Portugal as part of a study on multiple literacies and Web 2.0 in English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom (Cardoso). Based on the answers provided, it can be assumed that among this group of teachers, new technologies tend to be part of their professional practice. However, it is unclear if digital tools have been used to actually promote more innovative ways of teaching or just as a different way to approach more traditional methods. Moreover, it seems that suitable guidance, training and further development of appropriate materials are required to facilitate and better integrate new technologies in the EFL classroom.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anderson, Lorin W., et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, 2001.

  • Bezemer, Jeff, and Gunther Kress. Multimodality, Learning and Communication. Routledge, 2016.

  • Bloom, Benjamin. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals – Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain. Longman, 1956.

  • Bower, Matt. “Deriving a Typology of Web 2.0 Learning Technologies.” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 47, no. 4, 2016, pp. 763-77.

  • Buckingham, David. “Defining Digital Literacy: What Do Young People Need to Know about Digital Media?” Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, edited by Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel, Peter Lang, 2008, pp. 73-90.

  • Bustamante, Carolina, et al. “Web 2.0 and Language Learners: Moving from Consumers to Creators.” Touch the World: Selected Papers from the 2012 Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, edited by Tatiana Sildus, Robert M. Terry, 2012, pp. 109-31.

  • Cardoso, Silene. Multiple Literacies and Web 2.0 in the English as a Foreign Language Classroom. Masters Dissertation of University of Lisbon, 2017.

  • Carretero, Stephanie, et al. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with Eight Proficiency Levels and Examples of Use. EU Science Hub, 2017, EUR 28558 EN, DOI:10.2760/38842.

  • Churches, A. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy, 2009, Accessed 18 Nov. 2017.

  • Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR) – Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Provisional Edition. Sept. 2017, Accessed 30 Nov. 2017.

  • Crystal, David. English as a Global Language. 2nd ed., Cambridge UP, 2003.

  • Crystal, David. “English: Is it Still one Language?” Interviewed by Spotlight Magazine, vol. 8, 2016, pp. 36-38, Accessed 18 Nov. 2017.

  • Cope, Bill, and Mary Kalantzis. “Introduction: Multiliteracies, the Beginning of an Idea.” Multiliteracies: Literacy and the Design of Social Futures, edited by Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis, Routledge, 2000, pp. 3-8.

  • Cope, Bill, and Mary Kalantzis. New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education. Cambridge UP, 2008.

  • Dourda, Kyriaki, et al. “Combining Game-Based Learning with Content and Language Integrated Learning Approaches: A Case Study Utilizing QR Codes and Google Earth in a Geography-Based Game.” Paper presented at the 7th European Conference on Games-Based Learning, Porto, Portugal, 2013.

  • Dudeney, Gavin, and Nick Hockly. “Literacies, Technology and Language Teaching”. The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology, edited by Fiona Farr and Liam Murray, Routledge, 2016, pp. 115-26.

  • Ferrari, Anusca. DigComp: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. (DigComp 1.0), 2013, EUR 26035, DOI:10.2788/52966.

  • Freire, Paulo. Pedagogia do Oprimido. 17th ed., Paz e Terra, 1987.

  • Government of Portugal. National Digital Competence Initiative e.2030 (Portugal INCoDe.2030: Iniciativa Nacional Competências Digitais e.2030), 2017, Accessed 28 Nov. 2017.

  • Healey, Deborah. “Language, Learning and Technology”. The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology, edited by Fiona Farr and Liam Murray, Routledge, 2016, pp. 9-22.

  • Jenkins, Jennifer. World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2009.

  • Jewitt, Carey. “Multimodality and New Communication Technologies.” Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, edited by Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon, Georgetown UP, 2004, pp. 184-95.

  • Jewitt, Carey. Technology, Literacy, Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Routledge, 2006.

  • Jewitt, Carey. Learning and Communication in Digital Multimodal Landscapes: An Inaugural Professorial Lecture by Carey Jewitt. Institute of Education Press, 2013.

  • Jordão, Clarissa M., and Francisco C. Fogaça. “Critical Literacy in the English Language Classroom.” DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada, vol. 28, no. 1, 2012, pp. 69-84.

  • Kress, Gunter. Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge, 2003.

  • Kress, Gunter. “Gains and Losses: New Forms of Texts, Knowledge, and Learning.” Computers and Composition, vol. 22, no. 1, 2005, pp. 5-22.

  • Kress, Gunter. “What is Mode?.” The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Carey Jewitt, Routledge, 2011, pp. 54-67.

  • Kuo, Jun-Min. “Critical Literacy in the EFL Classroom: Evolving Multiple Perspectives through Learning Tasks.” The Journal of Asia TEFL, vol. 11, no. 4, 2014, pp. 109-138.

  • Luke, Allan, and Karen Dooley. “Critical Literacy and Second Language Learning”. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, edited by Eli Hinkel, Routledge, 2011, pp. 856-67.

  • Luke, Carmen. “Cyber-Schooling and Technological Change: Multiliteracies for New Times”. Multiliteracies: Literacy and the Design of Social Futures, edited by Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis, Routledge, 2000, pp. 67-88.

  • Ministry of Education. English Syllabus, Third Cycle [Programa de Inglês 3º Ciclo], 1995.

  • Ministry of Education. English Syllabus, Secondary Education [Programa de inglês Nível de Continuação, Formação Específica], 2003.

  • National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. Standards for Foreign Language Learning: Preparing for the 21st Century (Executive Summary), 1996, Accessed 30 Nov. 2017.

  • Prensky, Mark. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants.” On the Horizon, vol. 9, no. 5, 2001, pp. 1-6.

  • Redecker, Christine, et al. “Learning 2.0: The Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe”. Final Report. European Commission-Joint Research Center Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, 2009.

  • Riepel, J. The Web 2.0 Revolution: Using Technology to Shape Standard-Based Instruction. Master Thesis. West Virginia University, 2011.

  • Rojo, Roxane. “Pedagogia dos Multiletramentos”. Multiletramentos na Escola, organized by Roxane Rojo and Eduardo Moura, Parábola, 2012, pp. 11-31.

  • Scott, David, and Shane Beadle. Improving the Effectiveness of Language Learning: CLIL and Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2014, Accessed 30 Nov. 2017.

  • Sneed, Obiageli. “Integrating Technology with Bloom’s Taxonomy.” TeachOnline: Resources for Teaching Online, Accessed 30 Nov. 2017.

  • Vuorikari, Riina, et al. DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens (DigComp 2.0), 2016, EUR 27948 EN, DOI: 10.2791/11517.

  • Wu, Ting-Ting, and Yueh-Min Huang. “A Mobile Game-Based English Vocabulary Practice System Based on Portfolio Analysis”. Educational Technology & Society, vol. 20, no. 2, 2017, pp. 265-277.

  • Ya-Hui, Hsieh, et al. “Exploring the Role of Flow Experience, Learning Performance and Potential Behavior Clusters in Elementary Students’ Game-Based Learning”. Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 24, no. 1, 2013, pp. 178-93.

  • Yang, Shu-Ching. “Integrating Computer-Mediated Tools into the Language Curriculum”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 17, no. 1, 2001, pp. 85-93.


Journal + Issues