Subject and purpose of work: The study aims to assess the sustainability of rural areas of Western Himalayas during the year 2019.
Materials and methods: A questionnaire-based survey was conducted in upper Beas Valley of Himachal Pradesh. A total of 101 individuals were interviewed and the questionnaire was filled by the surveyor.
Results: Survey showed that high level of unemployment prevailed in the region with minimal monthly income. However, they engaged in agriculture and allied activities along with collection of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) to supplement their incomes. The proximity to protected areas led to frequent encounter with wildlife and such encounters increased after the commencement of Hydro Power Projects. Respondents believed that construction HPPs and expansion road network in the region has increased the occurrence of landslides; and many of them had lost their cultivated land due to landslides.
Conclusions: The study showed rural areas of upper Beas Valley were moderately unsustainable.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Ballabh, H., Pillay, S., Negi, G., Pillay, K. (2014). Relationship between Selected Physiographic Features and Landslide Occurrence around Four Hydropower Projects in Bhagirathi Valley of Uttarakhand, Western Himalaya, India. International Journal of Geosciences, 5, 1088-1099. https://doi:10.4236/ijg.2014.510093
4. Jolli, V., Pandit, M. (2011). Influence of Human Disturbance on the Abundance of Himalayan Pheasant (Aves, Galliformes) in the Temperate Forest of Western Himalaya, India. Vestnik Zoologii, 45(6), e-40. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10058-011-0035-0
5. Jolli, V. (2017a). Hydro power projects-boon or bane for the rural communities of Western Himalayas. Present Environment and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1515/pesd-2017-0005
6. Jolli, V. (2017b). Hydro Power Development and Its Impacts on the Habitats and Diversity of Montane Birds of Western Himalayas. Vestnik Zoologii, 51(4), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1515/vzoo-2017-0036
9. Kerlinger, F. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10. Kumar, D., Katoch, S. S. (2017). Dams turning devils: An insight into the public safety aspects in operational run of the river hydropower projects in western Himalayas. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.065
11. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitude scales. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.
12. Mehra, D. (2017). Wealth, mobility, accretive citizenship and belonging: Why everyone comes to Kullu and how they remain. In: Subaltern Urbanisation in India (p. 283-309). New Delhi: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3616-0_11
14. Pandey, S., Wells, M. P. (1997). Ecodevelopment planning at India’s Great Himalayan National Park for biodiversity conservation and participatory rural development. Biodiversity & Conservation, 6(9), 1277-1292. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000034013.15097.23
15. Sarkar, R. (2010). Rural accessibility and development: Sustainability concerns in an ecologically fragile mountain belt. Economic and Political Weekly, 63-71.
16. Singh, N., Kohli, D. S. (1997). The green revolution in Punjab, India: The economics of technological change. J Punjab Stud, 12(2), 285-306
17. Szolnoki, G., Hoffmann, D. (2013). Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. Wine Economics and Policy, 2(2), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2013.10.001