Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development in Africa – State of Production Determinants and Future Directions

Oluwaseun James Oguntuase 1
  • 1 Centre for Environmental Studies and Sustainable Development (CESSED), Lagos State University, Nigeria

Summary

Subject and purpose of work: This paper presents bioeconomy as a solution to sustainable development challenges in Africa. It identifies the current state of bioeconomy and its production determinants in African countries and regions, and the potential that bioeconomy has in these jurisdictions. This paper also highlights possible policy inputs for a sustainable bioeconomy on the continent.

Materials and methods: In addition to a systematic literature review, statistical databases and published indices, the paper also builds on the classical theory of productive forces to achieve its objectives.

Results: The bioeconomy potentials of African countries are poor when compared with those of countries with dedicated bioeconomy policies or strategies. Most of the bioeconomy related activities in Africa were centred on biofuel production as a substitute to fossil fuels.

Conclusions: African countries must formulate cohesive bioeconomy policies, make necessary targeted investments in research and innovation, and improve general governance to take advantage of opportunities in emerging sectors of bioeconomy to ensure sustainable livelihoods on the continent.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Adamowicz, M. (2014). European concept of bioeconomy and its bearing on practical use. Economic and Regional Studies, 7(4), 5-21.

  • 2. Adamowicz, M. (2017). Bioeconomy – concept, application and perspectives. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 350(1), 29-49.

  • 3. Aziz, F., Fahim, S.M., Usmani, W.U., Rizwan, M. (2013). Justification of entrepreneur: As a fourth factor of production. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(6), 5-7.

  • 4. Birner, R. (2018). Bioeconomy concepts. In: I. Lewandowski (ed.), Bioeconomy: Shaping the transition to a sustainable, bioba- sed economy (p. 17-38). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_3

  • 5. Bowman, M. S., Zilberman, D. (2013). Economic factors affecting diversified farming systems. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 33.

  • 6. Carraresi, L., Berg, S., Bröring, S. (2018). Emerging value chains within the bioeconomy: Structural changes in the case of phosphate recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.135

  • 7. Chavas, J. P., Kim, K. (2010). Economies of diversification: A generalization and decomposition of economies of scope. Inter- national Journal of Production Economics, 126, 229-235.

  • 8. Darmadji, D, Suwarta, S. (2018). The testing of entrepreneurship as the attempt to remodel the factor of production in the rice farming. Journal of Socioeconomics and Development, 1(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.31328/jsed.v1i1.519

  • 9. Devaney, L. A., Henchion, M. (2017). If opportunity doesn’t knock, build a door: Reflecting on a bioeconomy policy agenda for Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 48(2), 207-229.

  • 10. Devaney, L.A., Henchion, M., Regan A. (2017). Good governance in the bioeconomy. EuroChoices, 16(2), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.111/1746-692x.12141

  • 11. Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J.J., von Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the bioeconomy: A global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies. Sustainability, 10, 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190

  • 12. Dubois, O., San Juan, M.G. (2016). How sustainability is addressed in official bioeconomy strategies at international, national and regional levels: An overview. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Environment and Natural Resources Management Working Paper 63.

  • 13. Engerman, S.L., Sokoloff, K.L. (2003). Institutional and non-institutional explanations of economic differences. NBER Wor- king Paper No. 9989.

  • 14. Evers, H.D., Schweißhelm, R. (2005). Knowledge as a factor of production: Southeast Asia’s transition towards a knowledge society. Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 56(1), 37-48.

  • 15. Heimann, T. (2019). Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the bioeconomy support the achievement of the SDGs? Earth’s Future, 7, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001014

  • 16. Ionescu, R.V. (2013). The impact of the bioeconomy on the economic development under the global crisis. Acta Universitatis Danubius, 9(2), 186-193.

  • 17. Leitão, A. (2016). Bioeconomy: The challenge in the management of natural resources in the 21st century. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 26-42. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.411002

  • 18. Lewandoski, I., Bahrs, E., Dahmen, N., Hirth, T., Raush, T., Weidtmann, A. (2019). Biobased value chains for a growing bioeco- nomy. GCB Bioenergy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12578

  • 19. Maciejczak, M. (2015). What are production determinants of bioeconomy? Scientific Journal Warsaw University of Life Scien- ces – SGGW Problems of World Agriculture, 15(30), 4, 137–146.

  • 20. Maciejczak, M. (2017). Bioeconomy as a complex adaptive system of sustainable development. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 2(2), 7-10. doi:10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.22.3001

  • 21. McCormick, K., Kautto, N. (2013). The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability, 5, 2589-2608.

  • 22. Mihaela, E. (2009). The knowledge – as production factor. Studies and Scientific Researches - Economic Edition, 14, 39-43.

  • 23. Mungaray-Moctezuma, A.B., Perez-Nunez, S.M., Lopez-Leyva, S. (2015). Knowledge-based economy in Argentina, Costa Rica and Mexico: A comparative analysis from the bio-economy perspective. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 3(2), 213-236.

  • 24. Oguntuase, O.J., Adu, O.B., Obayori, O.S. (2018). Stimulating diffusion of bio-based products: The role of responsible research and innovation (RRI) approach. Journal of Research and Review in Science, 5, 130-135.

  • 25. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2002). Aggregated environmental indices: Review of aggregation methodologies in use. Contribution of Working Group on Environmental Information and Outlooks. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  • 26. Palatnik, R. R., Zilberman, D. (2017). Economics of natural resource utilization - The case of macroalgae. In: A. Pinto & D. Zilberman (eds.), Modeling, dynamics, optimization and bioeconomics II (p. 1-21). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

  • 27. Pasculea, M. (2015). Perspectives on developing the bioeconomy sector in Romania. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 17(1), 39-45.

  • 28. Sasson, A., Malpica, C. (2017). Bioeconomy in Latin America. New Biotechnology, 40/Pt A, 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.07.007

  • 29. Schlör, H., Venghaus, S., Hake, J. (2017). Green economy innovation index (GEII) – a normative innovation approach for Ger- many and its FEW nexus. Energy Procedia, 142, 2310-2316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.159

  • 30. Seo, H.A., Oh, C., Yoo, S.J. (2016). Measuring science and technology innovation capacity in developing countries: from a na- tional innovation system. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 10(10), 3428-3438.

  • 31. Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M., McCormick, K. (2013). Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: An analysis of official national approaches. Sustainability, 5, 2751-2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062751

  • 32. Sundać, D., Krmpotić, I.F. (2011). Knowledge economy factors and the development of knowledge-based economy. Croatian Economic Survey, 13(1), 105-141.

  • 33. Talavyria, M.P., Lymar, V.V., Baidala, V.V., Holub, R.T. (2016). Approaches to the definition of production determinants of bio-oriented economy. Ekonomika APK, 7, 39-44.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search