The Social Presences in Text-Based Collaborations Via Electronic Devices: Measuring the ‘Online-Self’ of the Young Generation in Bangladesh

Open access


The procedural revolution of technology making people more and more linked to virtual based lives, and providing an outline to live in online-based curriculums. However, not all the nations have the same level of access and equal opportunities to grip the fruit of communication technology, hence the social presence in cyberspace suppose to differ from nations to nations. The study tends to explore the facets of technology-mediated text-based correspondences of the young generation, who often apt to use their own technologically advanced telecommunication devices. To conceptualize the qualitative aspect of the study into quantitative findings, the key assumptions are tested in each step of the factor analysis process. Based on the scanned cases of the survey, the study concludes that the young generation of the nations, where technological advancement is yet to flourish is less formal, more emotionally sensitive and more open about their state of the mind compared to the technologically advanced nations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amichai-Hamburger Y. (2005). Personality and the Internet. The social net: Human behavior in cyberspace 27-55.

  • Amichai-Hamburger Y. Wainapel G. & Fox S. (2002). “On the Internet no one knows I’m an introvert”: Extroversion neuroticism and Internet interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior5(2) 125-128.

  • Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission (BTRC) Annual Report 2014 URL: Retrieved on May 12 2015

  • Bangladesh Telecommunications Company Limited (BTCL) Annual Report -2012-13 URL: Retrieved on September 27 2015

  • Boyd D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. MacArthur foundation series on digital learning–Youth identity and digital media volume 119-142.

  • Brown S. A. Fuller R. M. & Vician C. (2004). Who’s afraid of the virtual world? Anxiety and computer-mediated communication. Journal of the Association for Information Systems5(2) 2.

  • Caplan S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction a theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication research30(6) 625-648.

  • Caplan S. E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of communication55(4) 721-736.

  • Chinn Menzie D. and Robert W. Fairlie. (2004). The Determinants of the Global Digital Divide: A Cross-Country Analysis of Computer and Internet Penetration. Economic Growth Center. Retrieved from Retrieved on May 24 2016

  • Derks D. Bos A. E. & Von Grumbkow J. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: the importance of social context. Computers in human behavior23(1) 842-849.

  • Donath J. S. (1995 January). Visual Who: Animating the affinities and activities of an electronic community. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Multimedia (pp. 99-107). ACM.

  • Douglas K. M. & McGarty C. (2001). Identifiability and self-presentation: Computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. British journal of social psychology 40(3) 399-416.

  • Ellison N. Heino R. & Gibbs J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(2) 415-441.

  • Ellison N. Heino R. & Gibbs J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Media

  • Epley N. & Kruger J. (2005). When what you type isn’t what they read: The perseverance of stereotypes and expectancies over e-mail. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology41(4) 414-422.

  • Girden E. R. (2001). Evaluating research articles from start to finish. Thousand Oaks Calif. Sage Publications.

  • Gonzales A. L. & Hancock J. T. (2008). Identity shift in computer-mediated environments. Media Psychology11(2) 167-185.

  • Gujarati D.N. (2004). Basic Econometrics Tata McGraw Hill.

  • Hamilton A. (1999 February 15). You’ve got male!. Time 83.

  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU). ICT Facts and Figures 2014 Telecommunication Development Bureau URL: Retrieved 24 May 2016.

  • Islam I. (2010) Bangladesh Telecoms Sector: Challenges & Opportunities Asian Tiger Capital Research November 2010. Reports available online URL: Retrieved on May 24 2016

  • Kelly H. (2012) “83 million Facebook accounts are fakes and dupes” Published in Updated 0927 GMT (1727 HKT) August 3 2012 retrieved on May 16 2016. URL:

  • Kiesler S. Siegel J. & McGuire T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American psychologist39(10) 1123.

  • Matthews A. R. (2006). The Technological Insularity Scale: A Scale Development (Doctoral dissertation University of Notre Dame).

  • Parks M. & Roberts L. (1997). The Development of Personal Relationships “Making MOOsic”: On-line The Development of Personal Relationships On-line and a Comparison to their Off-line Counterparts.

  • Rahman A. (2007). Access to Global Information—A case of Digital Divide in Bangladesh. URL: Retrieved on May 11 2015

  • Rains S. A. & Scott C. R. (2007). To identify or not to identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication. Communication Theory17(1) 61-91.

  • Sproull L. & Kiesler S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management science32(11) 1492-1512.

  • The Business Habit Blog (2015). The Number of Facebook Users in Bangladesh URL: Retrieved on September 27 2015

  • Valkenburg P. M. Schouten A. P. & Peter J. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet. New media & society7(3) 383-402.

  • Walther J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology language and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior23(5) 2538-2557.

  • Wilson J. M. Straus S. G. & McEvily B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational behavior and human decision processes99(1) 16-33.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 196 85 0
PDF Downloads 112 77 6