The Architectural Object as a Sociospatial System

Open access


Concerns with the social inadequacy of architecture and the movement towards user-centred design call for new perspectives and architectural visions that can help alleviate usability problems and make buildings more user-friendly and accommodating in supporting user operations. Accordingly, this study proposes the concept of the sociospatial system. This conceptualization is based on premises of the systems approach and a social science interpretation of the problem. We provide a foundation for relating spatial-material objects and sociocultural phenomena, for homogenizing different discipline perspectives, and for developing relational descriptions of the systems components. This allows the built environment to be represented in terms of the sociocultural organism that it accommodates. The elastic concept of the sociospatial system described herein can be used as a holistic framework for the study of sociospatial interactions; including facilities programming and design, where this way of thinking can facilitate a holistic interpretation of a wide array of considerations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bailey J. (1965)‘The case history of a failure’ Architectural Forum Vol. 123 No. 12 pp.22-25.

  • Bailey K. (1994) Sociology and the New Systems Theory State University of New York Press Albany NY.

  • Bailey K. (2001)‘Systems theory’ in J Turner (ed.) Handbook of Sociological Theory Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York pp.379-401.

  • Balint J. and Shelton W. (1996)‘Regaining the initiative: forging a new model of the patient-physician relationship. JAMA Vol. 275 No. 11 pp.887-891

  • Banathy B. (1996) Designing Social Systems in a Changing World Plenum Press New York.

  • Bausch K. (2001) The Emerging Consensus in Social Systems Theory Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York.

  • Bedny G. and Karwowski W. (2007) A Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity: Applications to Human Performance and Work Design. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group Boca Raton FL.

  • Bohm D. (2002) Wholeness and the Implicate Order Routledge London original work published 1980.

  • Boudon P. (1972) Lived-in Architecture: Le Corbusier’s Pessac Revisited trans. G Onn MIT Press Cambridge: MA.

  • Brolin B. (1976) The Failure of Modern Architecture Van Nostrand Reinhold New York.

  • Eggins S. (2005) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics 2nd ed Bloomsbury Academic London.

  • Franck A. and Lepori B. (2007) Architecture from the Inside out: From the Body the Senses the Site and the Community 2nd ed Wiley-Academy Press Chichester England; Hoboken.

  • Gelatt H. (1989) ‘Positive uncertainty: a new decision-making framework for counseling’ Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol. 36 No. 2 pp.252-256.

  • Gero J. and Kannengiesser U. (2004) ‘The situated function-behaviour-structure framework’ Design Studies Vol. 25 pp. 373-391.

  • Hubka V. (1988) Theory of technical systems: a total concept theory for engineering design Springer-Verlag New York NY.

  • Huxtable A. (1970) Will they ever finish Bruckner Boulevard? Macmillan New York NY.

  • Jackson M. (2002) Systems approaches to management Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht NL; New York.

  • Jacobs J. (1961) The death and life of great American cities Random House New York.

  • Jones J. C. (1992) Design methods2nd edn Van Nostrand Reinhold New York.

  • Luhmann N. (1995) Social systems trans. J Bednarz Stanford University Press Stanford CA.

  • Luhmann N. (2000) Art as a social system trans. E Knodt Stanford University Press Stanford CA.

  • Luhmann N. (2012) Introduction to systems theory trans. P Gilgen Polity Cambridge England; Malden MA.

  • Nadler G. (1981) The planning and design approach Wiley New York.

  • Roth S. (1999) ‘The state of design research’ Design Issues Vol. 15 No. 2 pp. 18-26.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 252 78 3
PDF Downloads 112 69 6