Selecting the Most Optimal Conditions for the Polygraph Examination

Open access

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ben-Shakhar G. Gati I. Ben-Bassat N. Sniper G. (2000). Orienting Response Reinstatement and Dishabituation: Th e Eff ects of Substituting Adding and Deleting Components of Nonsignifi cant Stimuli. Psychophysiology 37 102-110.

  • Ben-Shakhar G. (2002). A Critical Review of Th e Control Questions Test (CQT). [in:] M. Kleiner (ed.) Handbook of Polygraph Testing. San Diego Academic Press 103-126.

  • Bradley M. (2009). Natural Selective Attention: Orienting and Emotion. Psychophysiology 46 1-11.

  • Bradley M. Silakowski T. Lang J. (2008). Fear of Pain and Defensive Activation. Journal of the International Association for the Study of Pain 137 (1) 156-163.

  • Elaad E. (2009). Eff ects of Context and State of Guilt on the Detection of Concealed Crime Information. International Journal of Psychophysiology 71 225-234.

  • Fiedler K. Schmid J. Stahl T. (2002) What is the Current Truth about Polygraph Lie Detection? Basic and Applied Social Psychology 24 (4) 313-324.

  • Furedy J. (2009) Th e Concealed Information Test as an Instrument of Applied Differential Psychophysiology: Methodical Considerations Applied Psychology and Biofeedback 34 (3) 149-160.

  • Gati I. Ben-Shakhar G. (1990). Novelty and Signifi cance in Orientation and Habituation: A Feature-Matching Approach Journal of Experimental Psychology:General 119 (3) 251-263.

  • Handler M. Honts Ch. (2007). Psychophysiological Mechanisms in Deception Detection: A Th eoretical Overview. Polygraph 36 4 221-232.

  • Iacono W. (2011). Encouraging the Use of the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT): What the GKT Has to Off er Law Enforcement. [in:] Verschuere B. et al. (ed.) Memory Detection Cambridge University Press 12-26.

  • Kleiner M. (2002). Physiological Detection of Deception in Psychological Perspectives: A Th eoretical Proposal. [in:] M.Kleiner (ed.) Handbook of Polygraph Testing. San Diego Academic Press 127-182.

  • Kniazev V. Varlamov G. (2012). Polygraf i ego praktitscheskoje primenenije. Polygraph and its practical application. Moscow [text in Russian].

  • Krapohl D. McCloughan J. Senter S. (2009). How to Use the Concealed Information Test. Polygraph 38 (1) 34-49.

  • Krapohl D. (2010). Demonstration Tests. Instructional module included in polygraph operating software of Lafayette and Limestone computer instruments.

  • Moltshanov A. Babikov A. (2012). Obtshaja teorija poligrafnych proverok (Th e general theory of polygraph examination) Yaroslavl Indigo [text in Russian].

  • Nakayama M. (2002). Practical Use of the Concealed Information Test for Criminal Investigation in Japan. Handbook of polygraph testing. London Academic Press.

  • Osugi A. (2011). Daily Application of Concealed Information Test: Japan [in:] Verschuere B. et al. (ed.) Memory detection. Cambridge University Press 253-275.

  • Patrick Ch. (2011) Science on the Rise: Birth and Development of the Concealed Information Test. [in:] Verschuere B. et al. (ed.) Memory Detection Cambridge University Press 3-11. Pavlov I.P. (1927). Conditioned Refl ex. Oxford England: Clarendon Press.

  • Saldžiūnas V. Kovalenka A. (2013). Legal Regulation and Practice of Polygraph Examinations in the Republic of Lithuania Polygraph 3 (42) 137-145.

  • Saldžiūnas V. Kovalenka A. (2014). Electrodermal Activity of the Skin During Polygraph Tests. European Polygraph (in print).

  • Saldžiūnas V. Kovalenka A. (2011). Effi ciency Formula for Polygraph Examination European Polygraph 3-4 (17-18) 135-141.

  • Saldžiūnas V. Kovalenka A. (2008a). Th e Event Knowledge Test European Polygraph 1 (3) 21-29.

  • Saldžiūnas V. Kovalenko A. (2008b). Th e Event Knowledge Test (EKT) in Polygraph Examination (Common Notice of Tactics) European Polygraph 3-4 (5-6) 209-220.

  • Saldžiūnas V. Kovalenka A. (2009a). Problems of Questions in Event Knowledge Test European Polygraph 3 (2) 69-75.

  • Saldžiūnas V. Kovalenka A. Soshnikov A. (2009c). Probability Assessment of the Value of Psychophysiological Stimuli European Polygraph 1 (7) 25-31.

  • Saldžiūnas V. Kovalenko A. Gaidarov K. (2009d). Th e Problems of Truth Perception During Psychophysiological Examination European Polygraph 3-4 (9-10) 145-152.

  • Saldžiūnas V. Kovalenka A. (2010). Field and Laboratory Polygraph Examinations European Polygraph 4 (14) 213-230.

  • Sokolov E.N. (1966). Orienting Refl ex as Information Regulator. [in:] A. Leontyev A. Luria A. Smirnov (eds.) Psychological Research in the USSR Moscow: Progress Publishers 334-360.

  • Soschnikov A. Komissarova J. Pelenicin A. Fedorenko V. (2008). Poligraf v praktike rassledovanija prestuplenij (Polygraph practice investigation of crimes) Moscow [text in Russian].

  • Suzuki R. Nakayama M. Furedy J. (2004). Specifi c and Reactive Sensitivities of Skin Resistance Response and Respiratory Apnea in a Japanese Concealed Information Test (CIT) of Criminal Quilt Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 36 (3) 202-209.

  • Varlamov V. Varlamov G. (2010). Lie Detection with Computer Moscow Print- Centr [text in Russian]. Verschuere B. Meijer E. De Clercq A. (2010). Concealed Information under Sstress: A Test of the Orienting Th eory in Real-Life Police Interrogations Legal and Criminological Psychology 1-10.

  • Verschuere B. Ben-Shakhar G. (2011). Th eory of the Concealed Information Test [in:] Verschuere B. et al. (ed.) Memory Detection. Cambridge University Press 128-150.

  • Verschuere B. Crombez G. Smolders L. De Clercq A. (2009). Diff erentiating Orienting and Defensive Responses to Concealed Information: Th e Role of Verbalization Appl. Psychophysiol Biofeedback 34 237-244.

Journal information
Target audience: Researchers and experts in the field of criminal law
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 169 103 4
PDF Downloads 63 47 0