[Abrams S., Polygraph validity and reliability: a review, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1973, 18, 4, pp. 313-326.10.1520/JFS10034J]Search in Google Scholar
[Cieślak M., zagadnienia dowodowe w procesie karnym, t. I Wyd. Prawnicze, Warszawa 1955, p. 82 and ff .]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaberle A., Dowody w sądowym procesie karnym, Ofi cyna a Wolters Kluwer business, Krakow 2007, p. 44 and ff .]Search in Google Scholar
[Inman K., Rudin N., Principles and practice of criminalistics. Th e profession of forensic science, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C., 2001, pp. 101-102. 110, 158.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ingram J.L., Criminal evidence, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg, London, New York, Oxford, Paris, San Diego, San Francisco, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo 2012, pp. 98-104. Innovations in evidence and proof. Integrating theory, research and teaching, P. Roberts, M. Redmayne (eds.), Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, 2009, pp. 219 and ff .]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiely T. F., Forensic evidence: science and the criminal law, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C. 2001, pp. 38-39, 169, 173, 277.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelken J., Dowod poszlakowy w procesie karnym, Wydawnictwo Prawnicze, Warszawa 1970, pp. 89 and ff . Report APA, Polygraph, special issue, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Widacki J., Wartość diagnostyczna badania poligrafi cznego i jej znaczenie kryminalistyczne, Wyd. UJ, Krakow 1977.]Search in Google Scholar
[Widacki J., Horvath F., An experimental investigation of the relative validity and utility of the polygraph technique and three other common methods of criminal identification, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1978, 23,3, pp. 596-601.10.1520/JFS10711J]Search in Google Scholar
[Ziembiński Z. Logika praktyczna , PWN Warszawa 1984, pp. 170-173. ]Search in Google Scholar
