Laboratory and Field Research on the Ocular-motor Deception Test

Bradley, M.M., Micolli, L., Escrig, M.A., Lang, P.J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45, pp. 602–607.10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x361294018282202Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, M. T., & Janisse, M. P. (1981). Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and pupillary measures. Psychophysiology, 18, pp. 307–315.10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03040.x7291448Search in Google Scholar

Cook, A.E., Hacker, D.J., Webb, AK., Osher, D., Kristjansson, S., Woltz, D.J., & Kircher, J.C. (2012). Lyin’ Eyes: Ocular-motor Measures of Reading Reveal Deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), pp. 301–313.Search in Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, pp. 297–334.10.1007/BF02310555Search in Google Scholar

Dionisio, D. P., Granholm, E., Hillix, W. A., & Perrine, W. F. (2001). Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing. Psychophysiology, 38, pp. 205–211.10.1111/1469-8986.3820205Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, D.J., Kuhlman, B., & Kircher, J.C., Cook, A.E., & Woltz, D.J. (2014). Detecting deception using ocular metrics during reading. In D.C. Raskin, C.R. Honts, & J.C. Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications. Elsevier, pp 159–216.10.1016/B978-0-12-394433-7.00005-1Search in Google Scholar

Hess, E.H., Polt, J.M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, pp. 349–350.10.1126/science.132.3423.34914401489Search in Google Scholar

Hess, E.H., Polt, J.M. (1964). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem solving. Science, 143, –1190–1192.10.1126/science.143.3611.119017833905Search in Google Scholar

Honts, C.R. (2012). Countermeasures and credibility assessment. In In DC Raskin, CR Honts, & JC Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications. Elsevier, pp. 131–156.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R., Jr., Barnhardt, J., & Zhu, J. (2005). Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: An event-related brain potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, pp. 386–404.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.01116099352Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.Search in Google Scholar

Kircher, J. C. (1981). Psychophysiological processes in the detection of deception. Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Kircher, J.C., Horowitz, S.W. & Raskin, D.C. (1988). Meta-analysis of mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique. Law and Human Behavior, 12, pp. 79–90.10.1007/BF01064275Search in Google Scholar

Kircher, J.C., Raskin, D.C., Honts, C.R., & Horowitz, S.W. (1994). Genereralizability of statistical classifiers for the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 31, S73. (Abstract)Search in Google Scholar

Loewenfeld, I. E. (1999). The pupil: Anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications (Vol. 1). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.Search in Google Scholar

Middle East (2016a). Ocular-motor detection of deception with Middle Eastern college students, Phase 1. Unpublished research. University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Middle East (2016b). Ocular-motor detection of deception with Middle Eastern college students, Phase 2. Unpublished research. University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

NSA (2012). Ocular-motor detection of deception with employees at the National Security Agency Phase 1. Unpublished research. University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

NSA (2013). Ocular-motor detection of deception with employees at the National Security Agency Phase 2. Unpublished research. University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Office of Technology Assessment (1983). Scientific validity of polygraph testing: A research review and evaluation. OTA-TM-H-15. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Search in Google Scholar

Osher, D. (2005). Multimethod assessment of deception: Oculomotor movement, pupil size, and response time measures. Unpublished dissertation, University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Patnaik, P. (2013). Ocular-motor methods for detecting deception: Direct versus indirect interrogation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Patnaik, P. (2015). Oculomotor methods for detecting deception: Effects of practice feedback and blocking. Unpublished dissertation, University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Patnaik, P., Woltz, D.J., Hacker, D.J., Cook, A.E., Ramm, M.L., Webb, A.K., & Kircher, J.C. (2016). Generalizability of an ocular-motor test for deception to a Mexican population. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 6(1), pp. 1–9.Search in Google Scholar

Raskin, D.C. & Kircher, J.C. (2014). Validity of polygraph techniques and decision methods. In D.C. Raskin, C.R. Honts, & J.C. Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications. Elsevier. pp. 63–129.Search in Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, pp. 372–422.10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.3729849112Search in Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, pp. 241–255.10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_3Search in Google Scholar

Steinhauer S. R., Boller F., Zubin J., Pearlman S. (1983). Pupillary dilation to emotional visual stimuli revisited. Psychophysiology, 20, p. 472.Search in Google Scholar

Steller, M. (1987). Psychophysiologische Aussagebeurteilung [Psychological assessment]. Hogrefe: Gottingen.Search in Google Scholar

Stern J.A., Walrath L.C., Goldstein, R. (1984). The endogenous eyeblink. Psychophysiology 21, pp. 22–33.10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb02312.x6701241Search in Google Scholar

USTAR (2010). Oculomotor deception detection. Unpublished research funded by the Utah Science Technology and Research Initiative.Search in Google Scholar

Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, pp. 141–142.10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.00316516533Search in Google Scholar

Webb, A.K. (2008). Effects of Motivation, and Item Difficulty on Oculomotor and Behavioral Measures of Deception. Unpublished dissertation, University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Webb, A. K, Honts, C. R., Kircher, J. C., Bernhardt, P.C., & Cook, A. E. (2009). Effectiveness of pupil diameter in a probable-lie comparison question test for deception. Legal and Criminal Psychology, 14(2), pp. 279–292.10.1348/135532508X398602Search in Google Scholar