[[1] Trovillo Paul Y. (1939), A history of lie detection. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 29, pp. 848–881, Reprinted in Polygraph 1972, 1 (2), pp. 46–74, and 1(3), pp. 151–160.10.2307/1136489]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Matte J.A., Forensic Psychophysiology Using The Polygraph, J.A.M Publications, Williamsville NY, 1996, pp. 41–42, 199, 203–205, 278, 281, 292, 325, 328–342.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Krapohl D., Sturm S., (2002), “Superdampening Concept”, Terminology Reference for The Science of Psychophysiological Detection of Deception, Polygraph 31 (3), p. 221.]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Honts C.R., Amato S.L., Gordon A. (2004), Validity of outside-issue questions in the control question test, The Journal of General Psychology 131 (1), pp. 53–76.]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Reid J.E., Inbau F.E., Truth and Deception, William & Wilkins, Baltimore 1977, p. 224.]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Ibidem, pp. 41–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Backster C., A Response to Kraphol & Ryan’s “Belated Look at Symptomatic Questions”, Polygraph, 30 (3), pp. 213–215.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Capps M.H, Knill B.L., Evans R.K. (1993), Effectiveness of the symptomatic questions, Polygraph, 22 (4), pp. 285–298.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Ibidem, p. 294.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Ibidem, p. 53.]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Krapohl D.J., Ryan A.H. (2001), A belated look at symptomatic questions, Polygraph 30 (3), p. 206.]Search in Google Scholar
