Business-Government Interaction: A Thematic Analysis

Open access

Abstract

The article analyzes the interaction between business and government, the purpose of which is to identify the leading thematic blocks, where the most significant issues underlying this interaction are concentrated. Highlighting two meanings in the practice of interaction between business and the state, in one of which the state merges with business, and in the other - disagrees with it on key issues, the author proposes to use the theory of stakeholders of I. M. Jawahar and G. L. McLaughlin. The use of this theory allows to identify several types of interaction, including six main functions: facilitating, stimulating, control, sanctions, arbitration and regulatory. The content of these functions is concentrated in the list of basic activities of authorities in the field of regulation of business processes. For the purpose of complex and systematic consideration of these functions, the article proposes a 3D model of interaction between government and business. On the basis of this model the author carries out the content analysis of materials of the leading among businessmen of the Omsk region newspaper “Commercial news” on the basis of which the leading thematic blocks of interaction of the power and business updated by various types of lighting are allocated (analytical article, interview, reportage, a note). The important role of the media in assessing and structuring the relationship between public authorities and business structures determines the usefulness content analysis and the choice of the object of the study. The study highlighted a number of leading thematic blocks of interaction, updated on the pages of the weekly in the period from 2018 to mid-2019. Based on the study, the author identified and ranked thematic blocks considered in the context of his proposed 3D- model, formulated the most characteristic problems of interaction between business and government at the present stage.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Bogachev M. I. (2011) Splicing as the oldest mechanism of dialogue between government and business in Russia. Business. Society Power. No. 6 74-83. (In Russian)

  • [2] Galitsky E. Levin M. (2007). Corruption in the relationship between business and government (the case of empirical analysis). Problems of Economics.. No. 117-32 (In Russian)

  • [3] Oleynik A. (2011). Political Economy of power: approaches to the analysis of relations between the state and business in Russia. Questions of economy. No. 5 19-33 (In Russian)

  • [4] Barysheva G.A. Nekhoroshev Yu.S. (2005) Government and business: legal and criminal mechanisms of interconnection. News of TPU.. No. 6. 203-206 (In Russian)

  • [5] Butova T.V.. Erkhov M.V. (2007) Government and business in modern society Moskow Maroseyka (In Russian)

  • [6] Shevchenko E.A. (2017) The role of public-private partnership in the system of interaction between business and government. Economics and Management: Problems and Solutions.. No 3 (3) 13-17 (In Russian)

  • [7] Alieva T. (2017) Model of the interaction of Government and business in the field of environmental management in the Russian Arctic. Problems of theory and practice of management.. No 1 19-25 (In Russian)

  • [8] Government and Business in Russia: Interaction in a Crisis: Monograph / Ed. A.N.Shokhin. [2016] Moskow SU-HSE (In Russian)

  • [9] Government and business: communication resources (2011). Collection of scientific articles. Series “Communicative research” Issue 5 Moskow HSE (In Russian)

  • [10] Jawahar I. M. McLaughlin G. L. (2002). Towards a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review 26 (3): 397-414.

  • [11] Business mortality: in 2018 in Russia closed twice as many companies than opened: June 6 2019 from https://finexpertiza.ru/press-service/researches/2019/smertnost-biznesa-za-2018/ (In Russian)

  • [12] Little and slowly. (2015). Rossiyskaya Gazeta from https://rg.ru/2015/04/14/dola.html]. (In Russian)

  • [13] Newman L. (1998) Nonreactive research and available data / / Sociological researches. No. 6 119-129 (In Russian)

  • [14] Sablin K. S. (2012) The role of the institutional environment in the formation of development institutions. Journal of institutional studies (journal of institutional studies) Volume 4 No 2. 2012 32-42 (In Russian)

  • [15] North D.(1998). Five Propositions about Institutional Change // Explaining Social Institutions / Ed. by J. Knight and I. Sened. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press 15-27

  • [16] Mannheim George.B. Rich R. K. (1997) Political Science: research methods: TRANS. Moskow the whole world (In Russian)

  • [17] Borishpolets K. P. (2005) Methods of political research: Studies. Manual for students. Higher educational. Moskow Aspect press (In Russian)

  • [1] www.bbc.com/russian/rolling_news/2013/07/130725_rn_china_growth_boost.shtml

  • [2] Newspaper”Commercial news” http://kvnews.ru/

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 14 14 14
PDF Downloads 15 15 15