Impact of Flexicurity Policies on the Romanian Labor Market

Open access


Along with joining the EU and with the desire to be compatible with the European labor market, flexicurity begins to penetrate gradually the Romanian labor market, becoming a topical concept, an economic and social recovery tool. In the simplest possible way, flexicurity can be defined as the compromise between flexibility and work safety. The flexicurity principle was born as a solution to the European dilemma: how to increase the competitiveness of European enterprises in global competition without sacrificing the European social model.

Although a gradual passage is attempted, the tradition of a profession inherited from one generation to another or a stable job still exists in the human resource mentality, but it no longer exists in the present society. The concept of flexicurity is relatively new, introduced in Europe in 2006, when the principles of flexicurity were developed, but they were implemented according to the economic specificity of each EU member state.

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effects that EU accession has had on the Romanian labor market and the subsequent steps to harmonize Romania with the European Union requirements from the point of view of human resources management, flexicurity at the labor market.

In Romania, the flexicurity balance is balanced, in the sense that the trade unions support a broader level of security, and the employers tend to a greater degree of flexibility.

In conclusion, the Romanian labor market to develop a high degree of flexicurity must aim at increasing employment and reducing long-term unemployment, promoting workplace security and reducing the rigidity of labor law, especially in case of voluntary dissolution of firms, or of collective redundancies. In addition, the flexibility of collective and individual work contracts is also sought.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Badulescu A. Unemployment in Romania. A retrospective analysis (1991-2005) Theoretical and Applied Economics no. 2 (2006).

  • [2] Badulescu A. Occupation and unemployment: between theoretical approaches and contemporary realities Publisher University of Oradea Oradea (2006).

  • [3] Becker S. G. Human capital Publisher All Bucharest (2000).

  • [4] Biagi F. Lucifora C. Demographic and education effects on uemployment in Europe Labour Economics (2007).

  • [5] Blaga E. Employment and training policies - a comparative approach of the Romanian system with the most relevant models in Europe Social Assistance Magazine no. 3-4 (2005).

  • [6] Blaga E. Active measures on the labor market Publisher Didactica si Pedagogica Bucharest Publisher Didactica si Pedagogica Bucharest (2010).

  • [7] Boccard N. Van Ypersele T. Wunsch P. Comparative advantage and social protection European Journal of Political Economy vol. 19. (2003).

  • [8] Constantinescu N. Problems of the transition to the economy market in Romania Publisher Fundatia Romania de Maine Bucharest (2000).

  • [9] Dickens E. Unemployment.Encyclopedia of Social Problems SAGE Publications Londra (2008).

  • [10] Godwin C. N. Social security mechanisms: theories design and practice Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxemburg (2008).

  • [11] Grigorescu A. Regional Analyses of the Education System in Romania (2011).

  • [12] Jula D. Jula N. M. Economic forecast Publisher Mustang Bucharest (2012).

  • [13] Kardos M. The employment trend and the unemployment problem in the Romanian economy Study University Petru Maior Series Economica Fasciculus 1 vol. IV (2010).

  • [14.] Lefresne F. A comparative overview of unemployment benefit: striving to provide security for employees in their career paths ETUI Brussells (2010).

  • [15] Maurice de Montmollin Ergonomics Vocabulary Publisher Octares Toulouse (1995).

  • [16] Maganaris E. Grigorescu D.R. Flexicurity in UK and Romania International Conference “Global Economy & Governance” - GEG 2014 September 10-12th 2014 Bucharest Romania organised by National School of Political Studies and Public Administration Wuhan University (China) Romanian Academy – Institute for Economic Forecast National Taiwan University (Taiwan) Ming Chuan University (Taiwan) CD Proceedings (2014).

  • [17] Maganaris E. Grigorescu D.R. The Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Labour Law Reforms in Greece and Romania Journal Ovidius University Annals Economic Sciences Series Volume (Year): XII (2012) Issue (Month): 3 (December) pp. 3-8 (2012).

  • [18] Pavoni N. An optimal unemployment compensation Journal of Monetary Economics no. 54 (2007).

  • [19] Socol C. Marinas M. Socol A.G. The state impact on the labor market. Differences in European submodels Theoretical and Applied Economics Volume XVII no. 8 (2010).

  • [20] Tangian Andranik S. Flexibility – Flexicurity – Flexinsurance WSI - Diskussionspapier (2007).

  • [21Ticlea A. Flexicurity - a current concept Publisher Humanitas Bucharest (2007).

  • [22] Zlate M. Tratat de Psihologie Organizational-Manageriala Vol. I no. 2/2001 Publisher Polirom (2004).

  • [23] Towards common principles of flexicurity: More and better jobs through flexibility and security European Commission. Directorate-General for Employment Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (07.2007).

  • [24] Mission for Flexicurity European Commission. Employment Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Bruxelles (02.2008).

  • [25] OECD: Live longer work longer (2006).

  • [26] OCDE: Employment Outlook (2007).

  • [27] European Social and Employment Policies Special Eurobarometer 261 (10.2006).

  • [28] Flexicurity Report National Observatory of Occupation and Vocational Training (09.2007).

  • [29] Research report on the social economy in Romania from a comparative European perspective MMFPS Bucharest (2010).

  • [30] National Strategic Report on Social Protection and Social Inclusion MMFPS Bucharest (2008-2010).

  • [31] Report Ministry of Labor Family and Equal Opportunities. Flexicurity Evolution of European Employment Policy National Observatory of Occupation and Vocational Training Bucharest (2007).

  • [32] Eurostat – European Commission Homepage last accessed 2018/05/29.

  • [33] Human Righits – European Union Homepage last accessed 2018/05/29.

  • [34] National Agency for Employment Homepage last accessed 2018/05/30.

  • [35] National Institute of Statistics Homepage last accessed 2018/05/29.

  • [36] The Labour Code updated in 2016 (the Law no.53/2003); updated with the Law 12/2015 (published in Romanian Official Monitor no.52/22 January 2015) and the Law 97/2015 (published in Romanian Official Monitor no.316/8 may 2015).

  • [37] Muffels R. Wilthagen T. (2013) Flexicuirty: a New Paradigm for the Analysis of Labour Market and Policies Challenging the Trade-Off Between Flexibility and Security Sociology Compass.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 206 206 25
PDF Downloads 178 178 44