The Impact of the Applied Exchange Rate Regimes on the Internal Balance of Transition Countries

Open access


One of the key goals of the economic policy makers of every country is to achieve internal and external balance. An unavoidable segment of the analysis concerning the achievement of internal and external balance is certainly the influence of the exchange rate regime applied in a country. European transition countries, despite their similar initial problems and final objectives, applied different exchange rate regimes adapted to the economic circumstances and needs of the country. The paper aims to examine and demonstrate the impact of the applied exchange rate regime on the internal balance of the transition countries. The research encompasses 10 representative transition countries, in the period from 2000-2014. The results of the research, from the aspect of internal balance, confirmed the justification of the application of the floating exchange rate regime in more developed, but not in less-developed, European transition countries. The application of floating exchange rate regimes in less-developed transition countries is associated with a considerably higher average inflation rate, which may be explained by the higher import dependence of lessdeveloped countries and by the consequent transfer of depreciation to price growth.

1. Beker - Pucar, E. (2010). Upravljano fluktuiranje deviznog kursa u režimu inflacionog targetiranja u tranzicionim ekonomijama sa osvrtom na Srbiju. Neobjavljena doktorska disertacija. Subotica: Ekonomski fakultet. Univerzitet u Novom Sadu.

2. Bubula, A. and Otker-Robe, I. (2002). The Evolution of Exchange Rate Regimes Since 1990: Evidence from De facto Policies. International Monetary Fund, WP/02/155.

3. Ćirović, M. (2000). Devizni kursevi. Beograd: Bridge Company

4. De Vita, G. and Kyaw, K. S. (2011). Does the Choice of Exchange Rate Regime Affect the Economic Growth of Developing Countries? The Journal of Developing Areas, Volume 45, Single Issue, Fall 2011, pp. 135-153.

5. Dornbusch, R. (1988). Real Exchange Rates and Macroeconomics: A Selective Survey. National Bureau Of Economic Research, Working Paper 2775.

6. Edwardsa, S. and Levy Yeyati, E. (2005). Flexible exchange rates as shock absorbers. European Economic Review, 49, pp. 2079-2105.

7. Fischer, S. and Sahay, R. (2000). The Transition Economies After Ten Years. National Bureau Of Economic Research, Working Paper 7664.

8. Frankel, J. A. (2003). Experience of and Lessons from Exchange Rate Regimes in Emerging Economies. National Bureau Of Economic Research, Working Paper 10032.

9. Ghosh, A., Gulde, A. M., Ostry, J. D. and Wolf, H. (1996). Does the Exchange Rate Regime Matter for Inflation and Growth?. Economic Issues 2, IMF.

10. Ghosh, A., Qureshi, M. S. and Tsangarides, C. (2011). Words vs. Deeds: What Really Matters? IMF, Working Paper, WP/11/112.

11. Habermeier, K., Kokenyne, A., Veyrune, R. and Anderson, H. (2009). Revised System for the Classification of Exchange Rate Arrangements. IMF, WP/09/211.

12. Ihnatov, I. and Căpraru, B. (2012). Exchange Rate Regimes and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern European Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, pp. 18-23.

13. Kovačević, R. (2002). Tranzicije zemalja centralne i istočne Evrope u tržišnu privredu. Privredna izgradnja, godina XLV: 3-4, str. 149-178.

14. Kovačević, R. (2011). Međunarodne finansije. Beograd: Centar za izdavačku djelatnost Ekonomskog fakulteta.

15. Krugman, R. P. i Obstfeld, M. (2009). Međunarodna ekonomija. Beograd: Datastatus

16. Levy-Yeyati, E. and Sturzenegger, F. (2000). Classifying Exchange Rate Regimes: Deeds vs. Words. Business School, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. the LACEA Conference in Santiago de Chile. Preuzeto 04.06.2013. sa

17. Levy-Yeyati, E. and Sturzenegger, F. (2001). Exchange Rate Regimes and Economic Performance. IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 47, Special Issue, pp. 62-98.

18. International Monetary Fund (1997). Exchange Rate Arrangements and Economic Performance in Developing Countries, IV, pp. 78-97. Preuzeto 17.03.2016. sa

19. International Monetary Fund. (2003). Classification of Exchange Rate Arrangements and Monetary Policy Frameworks, June. 30, 2003 [Zvanični podaci]. Dostupno na veb sajtu Međunarodnog monetarnog fonda: ˃ mfd ˃ 2003 ˃ eng

20. International Monetary Fund. (2008). De Facto Classification of Exchange Rate Regimes and Monetary Policy Frameworks, April, 2008. [Zvanični podaci]. Dostupno na veb sajtu Međunarodnog monetarnog fonda: ˃ mfd ˃ 2008 ˃ eng

21. International Monetary Fund. (2014). Annual Report on Exchange Rate Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions, 2014. [Zvanični podaci]. Dostupno na veb sajtu Međunarodnog monetarnog fonda: ˃ areaers ˃ ar2014

22. International Monetary Fund. (2016). World Economic Outlook Database, April 2016. [Zvanični podaci]. Dostupno na veb sajtu Međunarodnog monetarnog fonda: ˃ 2016/01 ˃ weodata

23. Reinhart, C. M. and Rogoff, K. S. (2002). The Modern Historu of Exchange Rate Arrangements: a Reinterpretation. NBER, Working Paper 8963.

24. Rogoff, K., Husain, A. M., Mody, A., Brooks, R. and Oomes, N. (2003). Evolution and Performances of Exchange Rate Regimes. International Monetary Fund, WP/03/243.

25. Sosvilla-Riveroa, S. and Ramos-Herreraa, M. C. (2014). Exchange-rate regimes and economic growth: An empirical evaluation. DOCUMENTOS DE ECONOMIA Y FINANZAS INTERNACIONALES, Working Papers on International Economics and Finance. Preuzeto 27.07.2017. sa

26. Transition Report. (1999). EBRD, London.


Innovative and Economic Research Journal

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 80 80 24
PDF Downloads 27 27 14