Effects of lignite surface mining on local communities: controversies and areas of negotiation

Jarosław Badera 1  and Leszek Pazderski 2
  • 1 Department of Applied Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia, 41-200, Sosnowiec, Poland
  • 2 Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Greenpeace Polska Foundation, 87-100, Toruń, Poland

Abstract

Selecting locations for lignite mining and power generation complexes has been the subject of intense controversy. As a result, there have been many conflicts in society due to environmental and economic concerns. This paper poses the question of how lignite surface mining affects local communities. These effects may be both negative and positive and some of them are intangible. It is very difficult to balance the pros and cons objectively as it depends on the assumed objectives and criteria of the analysis. Different social and economic structures in different communities, and various additional factors, are just some of the reasons why this balance may significantly differ around a country. The authors hold opposing views on the role of lignite in the energy mix and the balance of negative and positive effects that surface mining exerts on local communities. They agree, however, that the most important elements of the societal debate on lignite mining have not yet been adequately studied or presented in public discourse. The authors propose to introduce the procedure of Social Impact Assessment to the Polish legal system. This could be effective as a means to prevent many conflicts in the energy sector and be the best way to reach a compromise.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Badera J. 2010. Social conflicts on the environmental backdrop of the development of mineral deposits in Poland. Gosp. Sur. Min., 26, 1: 105–125.

  • Badera J., Kocoń P. 2014. Local community opinions regarding the socio-environmental aspects of lignite surface mining: experiences from central Poland. Energy Policy, 66: 507–516.

  • Barrow C. 2010. How is environmental conflict addressed by SIAs? Environ. Impact Ass. Rev., 30, 5: 293–301.

  • Dickmann F. 2008. Reclamation conditions of opencast mining in the Rhenish Lignite-mining Region (Germany). [in:] Conf. Human Impact on the Landscape and Geomorphological Hazards, Rohr Univ Bochum, Bochum. Zeit. Geomorph., 55, Suppl., 1: 15-24.

  • Dulewski J., Uzarowicz R. 2004. Brown coal open pits influence on the environment. WUG: Bezpieczeństwo. Pracy Ochr. Środ. Górn, 5: 3-4.

  • Dutkowski M. 1995. Conflicts in the use of environmental goods. Uniw. Gdański, Rozprawy rod. i Monografie 215.

  • Energy Road Map 2050, 2011. Communication from the Commission of European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. EU COM (2011) 885/2, European Committee, Brussels.

  • Franks D. 2012. Social Impact Assessment of Resource Projects. Mining for Development: Guide to Australian Practice. Int. Mining Dev. Centre, Perth (AUS).

  • Frączek P. 2011. Dealing with local conflicts in the energy sector. Polityka Energetyczna, 14, 2: 65–78.

  • Harris F. (ed.) 2012. Global Environmental Issues, 2nd Ed. Wiley–Blackwell.

  • Hipel K., Walker S. 2011. Conflict analysis in environmental management. Environmetrics, 22, 3: 279–293.

  • Kasztelewicz Z. 2012. Pros and cons of coal mining in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna, 15, 4: 7–27.

  • Kasztelewicz Z., Ptak M. 2009. Selected problems of securing brown coal deposits in Poland for opencast mining activity. Polityka Energetyczna, 12, 2/2: 263–276.

  • Kasztelewicz Z., Zajączkowski M. 2010. Impact of lignite mining on its surroundings. Polityka Energetyczna, 13, 2: 227–243.

  • Kemp D. 2010. Community Relations in the Global Mining Industry: Exploring the Internal Dimensions of Externally Orientated Work. Corporate Social Responsibility Environ. Manage., 17, 1: 1–14.

  • Malewski J., Blachowski J., Kaźmierczak U., Kucharska M. 2008. Środowiskowe i społeczne uwarunkowania eksploatacji złoża węgla brunatnego Legnica (Raport końcowy nr 18 w ramach:) Scenariusze rozwoju technologicznego przemysłu wydobycia i przetwórstwa węgla brunatnego / Inst. Górn. Odkr. Poltegor-Instytut, Wrocław.

  • Naworyta W., Badera J. 2012. Analysis of social and economic conditions for the planned development of the Gubin lignite deposit. Polityka Energetyczna, 15, 3: 107–118.

  • Pietrzyk-Sokulska E., Uberman R., Kulczycka J. 2015. The impact of mining on the environment in Poland – myths and reality. Gosp. Sur. Min., 31, 1: 45–64.

  • Sobczyk W. 2014. Sustainable development of rural areas. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 9, 1: 119–126.

  • Stern P. 1993. A Second Environmental Science: Human-Environment Interactions. Science, 260: 1897–1899.

  • Svobodova K., Sklenicka P., Molnarova K., Salek M. 2012. Visual preferences for the physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. Ecol. Eng., 43:, 34–44.

  • Uberman R., Naworyta W. 2011. Analysis and forecast of mining damages caused by open cast lignite mines. Zesz. Nauk. IGSMiE PAN 81: 165-175.

  • Uberman R., Naworyta W. 2012. Lignite exploitation under spatial and environmental restrictions – case study: Gubin lignite deposit. Polityka Energetyczna, 15, 4: 29–41.

  • Vanclay F. (ed.) 2014. Developments in Social Impact Assessment. Edward Elgar Publ., Cheltenham (UK).

  • Widera M., Kasztelewicz Z., Ptak M. 2016. Lignite mining and electricity generation in Poland: The current state and future prospects. Energy Policy, 92: 151–157.

  • Wilczyński M. 2012. Węgiel brunatny paliwem bez przyszłości. Inst. na Rzecz Ekorozwoju, Warszawa.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search