Network Analysis Approach to Stroke Care and Assistance Provision: An Empirical Study

Open access


To model and analyse stroke care and assistance provision in the Portuguese context from the network perspective. We used the network theory as a theoretical foundation for the study. The model proposed by Frey et al. (2006) was used to elicit and comprehend possible interactions and relations between organisations expected to be involved in the provision of care and assistance to stroke patients in their pathway to rehabilitation. Providers were identified and contacted to evaluate the nature and intensity of relationships. Network analysis was performed with the NodeXL software package. Analysis of 509 entities based on about 260 000 entries indicates that stroke care provision in the evaluated context is best captured in the coalition-collaboration setting, which appears to best demonstrate the character of the network. Information from analysis of the collaboration stage was not sufficient to determine the network dynamics. Application of the network theory to understand interorganisational dynamics of the complex health care context. Empirical validation of the model proposed by Frey et al. (2006) in terms of its operationalisation and the way it actually reflects the practical context. Examination and analysis of interorganisational relationships and its contribution to management of compound health care context involving actors from various sectors.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Andreasson S. & Winge M. (2010). Innovations for sustainable health and social care: Value-creating health and social care processes based on patient need. Stockholm Sweden: Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation System.

  • Barros P. & Simões J. (2007). Health system review. Health Systems in Transition 9(5) 1-140.

  • Brass D. J. Butterfield K. D. & Skaggs B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. The Academy of Management Review 23(1) 14-31.

  • Eurostat. (2008). Population Statistics. Retrieved from

  • Eurostat. (2010). Europe in figures. Eurostat yearbook 2010. Retrieved from

  • Freeman L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1 215-239.

  • Frey B. B. Lohmeier J. H. Lee S. W. & Tollefson N. (2006). Measuring collaboration among grant partners. American Journal of Evaluation 27(3) 383-392.

  • Garton L. Haythornwaite C. & Wellman B. (1999). Studying on-line social networks. In S. Jones (Ed.) Doing Internet Research. Thousand Oaks USA: SAGE Publications Inc.

  • Greenwald H. P. (2008). Challenges in cross-sectoral partnerships: An organizational perspective. Consortium on Collaborative Governance (CCG) Mini-Conference. Retrieved from

  • Kreisel W. & von Schrinding Y. (1998). Intersectoral action for health: A cornerstone for health for all in the twenty-first century. World Health Statistics Quarterly 51(1) 75-78.

  • Lewis J. M. (2005). A network approach for researching partnerships in health. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 2(22).

  • Lim P. C. & Tang N. K. H. (2000). A study of patients’ expectations and satisfaction in Singapore hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 13(7) 290-299.

  • Luke D. & Harris J. (2007). Network analysis in public health: History methods and applications. Annual Review of Public Health 28 69-93.

  • Mackay J. & Mensah G. (2004). The atlas of heart disease and stroke. Geneva Switzerland: World Health Organization.

  • Mitchell J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In J. C. Mitchell (Ed.) Social Networks in Urban Situations (pp. 1-44). Manchester England: Manchester University Press.

  • Moutinho M. Magalhães R. Correia M. & Silva M. C. (2013). Avaliação da via verde do acidente vascular cerebral de Portugal: Caracterização e prognóstico dos utilizadores [Evaluation of the green pathway of stroke in Portugal: Characterization and prognosis of users]. Acta Médica Portuguesa 26(2) 113-122.

  • Palazzolo M. Grippa F. Booth A. Rechner S. Bucuvalas J. & Gloor P. (2011). Measuring social network structure of clinical teams caring for patients with complex conditions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 26 17-29.

  • Pierson C. (2006). Beyond the welfare state?: The new political economy of welfare. Cambridge England: Polity Press.

  • Rutten R. P. J. H. & Boekema F. W. M. (2004). The spatial dimension of inter-firm learning: Case study and conceptualization. In: P. H. Cooke A. Piccaluga (Eds.) Regional Economies as Knowledge Laboratories. Cheltenham England: Edward Elgar.

  • Sá M. J. (2009). AVC - primeira causa de morte em Portugal [AVC - the leading cause of death in Portugal]. Revista da Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde 6 12-19.

  • Santana S. Rente J. Neves C. Redondo P. Szczygiel N. Larsen T. Jepsen B. & Langhorne P. (2016). Early home-supported discharge for patients with stroke in Portugal: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 31(2) 197-206.

  • Truelsen T. Piechowski-Jozwiak B. Bonita R. Mathers C. Bogousslavsky J. & Boysen G. (2006). Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: A review of available data. European Journal of Neurology 13(6) 581-598.

  • Wasserman S. & Faust K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York USA: Cambridge University Press.

  • World Health Organization. (2010). Portugal. Health system performance assessment. Retrieved from

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.72

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.505

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 220 129 3
PDF Downloads 94 60 4